The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The global war for internet governance
Abstract
Keynote Address: Laura DeNardis, The Global War for Internet Governance Internet governance conflicts are the new spaces where political and economic power is unfolding in the 21st century. Technologies of Internet governance increasingly mediate freedom of expression and individual privacy. They are entangled with national security and global commerce. The distributed nature of Internet governance technologies is shifting historic control over these public interest areas from sovereign nation-states to private ordering and new global institutions. The term "Internet governance" conjures up a host of global controversies such as the prolonged Internet outage in Syria during political turmoil or Google's decision not to acquiesce to U.S. government requests to remove an incendiary political video from YouTube. It invokes narratives about the United Nations "taking over" the Internet, NSA surveillance revelations, cybersecurity concerns about denial of service attacks, and the mercurial privacy policies of social media companies. These issues exist only at the surface of a technologically concealed and institutionally complex ecosystem of governance that is generally out of public view. This talk explains how the Internet is currently governed, particularly through the sinews of power that exist in technical architecture and new global institutions, and presents several brewing Internet governance controversies that will affect the future of economic and expressive liberty.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Multistakeholderism: anatomy of an inchoate global institution
Raymond, M., & DeNardis, L. (2015) · International Theory · doi:10.1017/s1752971915000081 · Cited by 351
Self-citationThe Digital Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
Acs, Z. J., & Sussan, F. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2918535 · Cited by 336
The invisible politics of Bitcoin: governance crisis of a decentralised infrastructure
De Filippi, P., & Loveluck, B. (2016) · Internet Policy Review · doi:10.14763/2016.3.427 · Cited by 298
The impact of digital technology usage on economic growth in Africa
Solomon, E. M., & van Klyton, A. (2020) · Utilities Policy · doi:10.1016/j.jup.2020.101104 · Cited by 269
Illusions of techno-nationalism.
Luo, Y. (2022) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-021-00468-5 · Cited by 257
“Since economic security forms a part of national security, many people see some legitimacy underlying the new view of techno-nationalism (see DeNardis, 2014; Evenett, 2019; Yamada, 2000).”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- DeNardis, L.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2014-06-23
- Pages
- 3-3
- OpenAlex
- W1988514033
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The global war for internet governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2615569.2618146
- The paper
- DeNardis, L. (2014). The global war for internet governance. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM conference on Web science. https://doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2618146
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.