Cited by 4Stroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MotionTalk: personalized home rehabilitation system for assisting patients with impaired mobility

Open access
Venugopalan, Janani, Cheng, Chih-Wen, Wang, May D.·2014·Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics

Abstract

Physical injury, stroke, trauma, traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury rank among the top causes of disability. There are a total of 54 million people in the US requiring rehabilitative assistance of which 15.3 million people are in the age groups of 18-44. However, the compliance rate for patients performing rehabilitation exercises in the home environment is poor. In this paper, we design and prototype a personalized home rehabilitation system, MotionTalk, for the real time quantitative assessment of mobility. Performance of rehabilitation is designed to be assessed using the changes in mobility, reflected in the exercises performed by patients at home with respect to the same exercises performed in the clinic. Our system is capable of capturing motion using Microsoft Kinect and analyzing the position and rotation information to give scores for assessing rehabilitation progress. In comparison to conventional rehabilitation systems, MotionTalk is an inexpensive (<$150 compared to conventional systems costing >$1000), less intrusive and personalized home rehabilitation system, which was developed and tested using data from able-bodied volunteers at Georgia Institute of Technology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2649387.2649430

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The design requirements align with several other research studies that have extracted design requirements for recovery, such as post-operative cancer care, physical injury, cognitive rehabilitation, and recovery in critical care units.

    “Our design requirements align with several other research studies that have extracted design requirements for recovery, such as post-operative cancer care [4], physical injury [73, 82], cognitive rehabilitation [36], and recovery in critical care units[66].”

    From A Data Visualization Tool for Patients and Healthcare Providers to Communicate during Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation (2024) · cites this paper as [73]

    The Introduction identifies physical injury among conditions requiring rehabilitation, and §2.1 (Use Cases; page unavailable) describes the functions designed for MotionTalk’s home-rehabilitation system. This supports citing MotionTalk as a physical-injury rehabilitation design study, but our copy does not report extracting design requirements for recovery. (LLM, conf=0.79)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Venugopalan, J., Cheng, C.-W., & Wang, M. D.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 5th ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics
Publisher
ACM
Published
2014-09-20
Volume
2014
Pages
455-463
OpenAlex
W2017681660
Cited by
4
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.56
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (U54CA119338)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
home-based rehabilitation, motion capture, Kinect sensor, mobility assessment, rehabilitation progress monitoring, low-cost rehabilitation device, stroke rehabilitation, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, rehabilitation compliance, personalized rehabilitation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review