The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding User Beliefs About Algorithmic Curation in the Facebook News Feed
Abstract
People are becoming increasingly reliant on online socio-technical systems that employ algorithmic curation to organize, select and present information. We wanted to understand how individuals make sense of the influence of algorithms, and how awareness of algorithmic curation may impact their interaction with these systems. We investigated user understanding of algorithmic curation in Facebook's News Feed, by analyzing open-ended responses to a survey question about whether respondents believe their News Feeds show them every post their Facebook Friends create. Responses included a wide range of beliefs and causal inferences, with different potential consequences for user behavior in the system. Because user behavior is both input for algorithms and constrained by them, these patterns of belief may have tangible consequences for the system as a whole.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The algorithms embedded in social media adjust the content they feed each particular user such that each user will remain engaged with the platform for ever longer periods of time”
From Ethics of the Attention Economy: The Problem of Social Media Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Rader & Gray, 2015
In the citing paper
“Social media companies use so-called adaptive algorithms that continuously refine their platforms such that they can become more addictive for each user.”
From Ethics of the Attention Economy: The Problem of Social Media Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Rader & Gray, 2015
Citations
Cites
Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks
Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1320040111 · Cited by 3,687
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-6156 · Cited by 3,084
The role of social networks in information diffusion
Bakshy, E., Rosenn, I., Marlow, C., & Adamic, L. (2012) · Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2187836.2187907 · Cited by 1,526
Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook
Joinson, A. N. (2008) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1357054.1357213 · Cited by 1,393
Wright, D., & Meadows, D. H. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781849773386 · Cited by 1,373
Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook
Bucher, T. (2012) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444812440159 · Cited by 1,305
Patterson, T. E. (1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,293
Mental Models: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Theory and Methods
Jones, N. A., Ross, H., Lynam, T., Perez, P., & Leitch, A. (2011) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-03802-160146 · Cited by 1,055
Gillespie, T. (2014) · Media Technologies · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9042.003.0013 · Cited by 1,016
Sociotechnical principles for system design
Clegg, C. (2000) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/s0003-6870(00)00009-0 · Cited by 846
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Backstrom L., 2013, Aug.
- Lenhart A., 2009, Adults and social network sites. Tech. rep
- Sharma A., 2013, ICWSM '13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, S., Abuhmed, T., El-Sappagh, S., Muhammad, K., Alonso-Moral, J. M., Confalonieri, R., Guidotti, R., Del Ser, J., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., & Herrera, F. (2023) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101805 · Cited by 1,762
The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms
Bucher, T. (2016) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1154086 · Cited by 1,420
“As Rader and Gray (2015) point out, the feedback-loop characteristics of these systems make user beliefs an important component in shaping the overall system behaviour.”
BackgroundInfluentialLee, M. K. (2018) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951718756684 · Cited by 1,338
“First, our research contributes to emerging studies that investigate people’s mental models and folk theories of algorithms (Bucher, 2016; Eslami et al., 2015; Rader and Gray, 2015), and social studies on automation, artificial intelligence and machine learning more broadly.”
BackgroundInfluentialA Multidisciplinary Survey and Framework for Design and Evaluation of Explainable AI Systems
Mohseni, S., Zarei, N., & Ragan, E. D. (2021) · ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1145/3387166 · Cited by 785
“In order to find out how an intelligent system should explain its behavior for non-experts, research on machine learning explanations has studied how users interpret intelligent agents [47, 164] and algorithms [171] to find out what users expect from machine explanations.”
BackgroundImproving Fairness in Machine Learning Systems: What Do Industry Practitioners Need?
Holstein, K., Wortman Vaughan, J., Daumé, H., Dudik, M., & Wallach, H. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300830 · Cited by 777
“…influence every facet of our lives, including the quality of healthcare and education we receive [16, 31, 32, 49], which news or social media posts we see [4, 18, 84], who receives a job [46, 82], who is released from jail [8, 23], and who is subjected to increased policing [65, 71, 94].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Rader, E., & Gray, R.
- Affiliations
- Michigan State University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2015-04-18
- Pages
- 173-182
- OpenAlex
- W2140553307
- Semantic Scholar
- 24f0e8db461cb8a35f642bf07ab407d546c9a0ab
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 45 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 124.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1217212)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Keywords
- algorithmic curation, Facebook News Feed, algorithm awareness, causal inference, user behavior, social networking sites, information curation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
