Cited by 102ICT in Developing CommunitiesInnovative Human-Technology InteractionUsability and User Interface Design

Residual Mobilities: Infrastructural Displacement and Post-Colonial Computing in Bangladesh

Ahmed, Syed Ishtiaque, Mim, Nusrat Jahan, Jackson, Steven J.·2015·Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

This paper explores discrepancies between the founding assumptions of mobile and ubiquitous computing in the western world, and the starkly different experiences of mobility and infrastructure to be found in many post-colonial environments. Based on a field study of forced mobility and technology use among populations displaced by the Hatirjheel waterfront development project in Dhaka, Bangladesh, we make two basic arguments. First, we point to the partial nature of assumptions around mobility that frame the imagination of mainstream HCI research, and argue that different and heretofore residual experiences of mobility must also be accounted for in post-colonial and other marginal computing environments. Second, we document four forms of infrastructural experience -- dispossession, reconstitution, collaboration, and repair -- that characterize real-world engagements with infrastructure in such settings. We conclude with implications for HCI research and design, and reflections on how HCI researchers might better account for such experiences in their work.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2702123.2702573

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adoption of technology is deeply influenced by cultural context, and technological analyses of impact and use cannot be universally applied or ported over.

    “Works of Irani [56], Raval [91], Ahmed [3], Chandra [25], Das [31], and Kumar [66], amongst others, have shown us that adoption of technology is deeply influenced by cultural context, and as such, technological analyses of impact and use cannot be universally applied or ported over.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ahmed, S. I., Mim, N. J., & Jackson, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BD)
Venue
Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-04-18
Pages
437-446
OpenAlex
W2030770553
Cited by
102
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7
FWCI
7.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
Intel Science and Technology Center for Social Computing
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › ICT in Developing Communities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords
forced mobility, displaced persons, infrastructure, dispossession, reconstitution, collaboration, repair, mobile computing, ubiquitous computing, Dhaka

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review