The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Taxonomy and Survey of Collaborative Intrusion Detection
Abstract
The dependency of our society on networked computers has become frightening: In the economy, all-digital networks have turned from facilitators to drivers; as cyber-physical systems are coming of age, computer networks are now becoming the central nervous systems of our physical world—even of highly critical infrastructures such as the power grid. At the same time, the 24/7 availability and correct functioning of networked computers has become much more threatened: The number of sophisticated and highly tailored attacks on IT systems has significantly increased. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) are a key component of the corresponding defense measures; they have been extensively studied and utilized in the past. Since conventional IDSs are not scalable to big company networks and beyond, nor to massively parallel attacks, Collaborative IDSs (CIDSs) have emerged. They consist of several monitoring components that collect and exchange data. Depending on the specific CIDS architecture, central or distributed analysis components mine the gathered data to identify attacks. Resulting alerts are correlated among multiple monitors in order to create a holistic view of the network monitored. This article first determines relevant requirements for CIDSs; it then differentiates distinct building blocks as a basis for introducing a CIDS design space and for discussing it with respect to requirements. Based on this design space, attacks that evade CIDSs and attacks on the availability of the CIDSs themselves are discussed. The entire framework of requirements, building blocks, and attacks as introduced is then used for a comprehensive analysis of the state of the art in collaborative intrusion detection, including a detailed survey and comparison of specific CIDS approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Douceur, J. R. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45748-8_24 · Cited by 4,419
Bro: a system for detecting network intruders in real-time
Paxson, V. (1999) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(99)00112-7 · Cited by 2,636
Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., & Friedman, E. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/355112.355122 · Cited by 2,190 · cited 1×
“ACM Computing Surveys, Vol Taxonomy and Survey of Collaborative Intrusion Detection 55:7 A generic countermeasure against malicious insiders in distributed systems is the adoption of reputation systems [Resnick et al. 2000; Marti and Garcia-Molina 2006], such as EigenTrust [Kamvar et al. 2003].”
Method
Cited by
Chained Anomaly Detection Models for Federated Learning: An Intrusion Detection Case Study
Preuveneers, D., Rimmer, V., Tsingenopoulos, I., Spooren, J., Joosen, W., & Ilie-Zudor, E. (2018) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app8122663 · Cited by 323
Azam, Z., Islam, M. M., & Huda, M. N. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3296444 · Cited by 265
From intrusion detection to attacker attribution: A comprehensive survey of unsupervised methods
Nisioti, A., Mylonas, A., Yoo, P. D., & Katos, V. (2018) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2854724 · Cited by 212
SP-CIDS: Secure and Private Collaborative IDS for VANETs
Raja, G., Anbalagan, S., Vijayaraghavan, G., Theerthagiri, S., Suryanarayan, S. V., & Wu, X.-W. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.3036071 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Vasilomanolakis, E., Karuppayah, S., Mühlhäuser, M., & Fischer, M.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2015-05-11
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-33
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W1772700132
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 32.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taxonomy and Survey of Collaborative Intrusion Detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2716260
- The paper
- Vasilomanolakis, E., Karuppayah, S., Mühlhäuser, M., & Fischer, M. (2015). Taxonomy and Survey of Collaborative Intrusion Detection. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/2716260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.