Cited by 20Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsDiscourse Analysis in Language Studies

Discourse cohesion: a signature of collaboration

Open access
Dascalu, Mihai, Trausan-Matu, Stefan, Dessus, Philippe, McNamara, Danielle S.·2015·Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge

Abstract

As Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) becomes increasingly adopted as an alternative to classic educational scenarios, we face an increasing need for automatic tools designed to support tutors in the time consuming process of analyzing conversations and interactions among students. Therefore, building upon a cohesion-based model of the discourse, we have validated ReaderBench, a system capable of evaluating collaboration based on a social knowledge-building perspective. Through the inter-twining of different participants' points of view, collaboration emerges and this process is reflected in the identified cohesive links between different speakers. Overall, the current experiments indicate that textual cohesion successfully detects collaboration between participants as ideas are shared and exchanged within an ongoing conversation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2723576.2723578

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dascalu, M., Trausan-Matu, S., Dessus, P., & McNamara, D. S.
Affiliations
  • University Politehnica of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
  • Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-03-16
Pages
350-354
OpenAlex
W2049228900
Cited by
20
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6
FWCI
2.63
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Locations
  • International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
NSF (1417997, 1418378)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Keywords
textual cohesion, computer-supported collaborative learning, student dialogue, discourse analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review