Discourse cohesion: a signature of collaboration
Open accessAbstract
As Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) becomes increasingly adopted as an alternative to classic educational scenarios, we face an increasing need for automatic tools designed to support tutors in the time consuming process of analyzing conversations and interactions among students. Therefore, building upon a cohesion-based model of the discourse, we have validated ReaderBench, a system capable of evaluating collaboration based on a social knowledge-building perspective. Through the inter-twining of different participants' points of view, collaboration emerges and this process is reflected in the identified cohesive links between different speakers. Overall, the current experiments indicate that textual cohesion successfully detects collaboration between participants as ideas are shared and exchanged within an ongoing conversation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cohesion is central to effective collaboration and plays a foundational role in developing skills essential for lifelong learning.
“Cohesion is central to effective collaboration and plays a foundational role in developing skills essential for lifelong learning (Dascalu et al., 2015, pp. 350 -354).”
From An unobtrusive approach to modelling team cohesion and collaboration in ecological classroom settings (2026) · cites this paper as Dascalu et al., 2015
Cites
Austin, J. L. (1975) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198245537.001.0001 · Cited by 21,496 · see citing works
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ferreira‐Mello, R., André, M., Pinheiro, A., Costa, E., & Romero, C. (2019) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1332 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Azad, A., Kovanovic, V., Korolkiewicz, M., Zamecnik, A., Joksimovic, S., & Cukurova, M. (2026) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102268 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dascalu, M., Trausan-Matu, S., Dessus, P., & McNamara, D. S.
- Affiliations
- University Politehnica of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
- Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2015-03-16
- Pages
- 350-354
- OpenAlex
- W2049228900
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- NSF (1417997, 1418378)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Keywords
- textual cohesion, computer-supported collaborative learning, student dialogue, discourse analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review