Cited by 11,730Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesLinguistics and Discourse Analysis

Speech Acts

Searle, John R.·1969·Cambridge University Press eBooks

Abstract

Written in an outstandingly clear and lively style, this 1969 book provokes its readers to rethink issues they may have regarded as long since settled.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/cbo9781139173438

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Talk is a type of action with potential to instigate further activities over time.

    “We take a different approach by regarding talk as a type of action with potential to instigate further activities over time (Austin, 1962;Searle, 1969; see also Gond, Cabantous, Harding, & Learmonth, 2015).”

    From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as Searle, 1969

  • Some acts consist precisely in saying something, for instance declaring, promising, warning, inviting and congratulating.

    “Some acts consist precisely in saying something, for instance declaring, promising, warning, inviting and congratulating (Austin, 1962;Searle, 1969).”

    From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as Searle, 1969

  • Brunsson disregards situations in which talk drives action.

    “Hereby, he disregards situations in which talk drives action (Austin, 1962;Gond et al., 2015;Searle, 1969).”

    From Timely hypocrisy? Hypocrisy temporalities in CSR communication (2020) · cites this paper as Searle, 1969

  • Eve's speeches in Gen 4 are illocutionary acts with declarative, assertive, and performative force on two levels: the story level and the storyteller level.

    “Mann's study concludes that Eve's speeches are illocutionary acts (that is, actions carried out through speech) with a declarative, assertive, and performative force on two levels: the story level and the storyteller level.”

    From Reframing Genesis 3:16: Eve’s Creation Memoir (2024) · cites this paper as Searle 1969

  • Searle's schematism of speech acts appears to be the best known and most widely applied, even if still occasionally contested.

    “Searle ' s schematism appears to be the best known and most widely applied, even if it is still occasionally contested.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Searle, J. R.
Corresponding author
Searle, John R.
Venue
Cambridge University Press eBooks
Published
1969-01-01
OpenAlex
W4235073904
Cited by
11,718
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 586 · 2025: 605 · 2024: 425 · 2023: 466 · 2022: 456 · 2021: 528 · 2020: 522 · 2019: 831 · 2018: 498 · 2017: 446 · 2016: 456 · 2015: 349 · 2014: 647 · 2013: 294 · 2012: 245
FWCI
86.53
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cambridge University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • RCIN (Digital Repository of the Scientifics Institutes) (Institute of Archaeology and Ethnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Linguistics and Discourse Analysis
Keywords
speech acts, pragmatics, utterance interpretation, illocutionary force, conversational meaning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review