Cited by 67Spam and Phishing DetectionMobile Crowdsensing and CrowdsourcingWeb Data Mining and Analysis

Crowd Fraud Detection in Internet Advertising

Tian, Tian, Zhu, Jun, Xia, Fen, Zhuang, Xin, Zhang, Tong·2015·Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web

Abstract

The rise of crowdsourcing brings new types of malpractices in Internet advertising. One can easily hire web workers through malicious crowdsourcing platforms to attack other advertisers. Such human generated crowd frauds are hard to detect by conventional fraud detection methods. In this paper, we carefully examine the characteristics of the group behaviors of crowd fraud and identify three persistent patterns, which are moderateness, synchronicity and dispersivity. Then we propose an effective crowd fraud detection method for search engine advertising based on these patterns, which consists of a constructing stage, a clustering stage and a filtering stage. At the constructing stage, we remove irrelevant data and reorganize the click logs into a surfer-advertiser inverted list; At the clustering stage, we define the sync-similarity between surfers' click histories and transform the coalition detection to a clustering problem, solved by a nonparametric algorithm; and finally we build a dispersity filter to remove false alarm clusters. The nonparametric nature of our method ensures that we can find an unbounded number of coalitions with nearly no human interaction. We also provide a parallel solution to make the method scalable to Web data and conduct extensive experiments. The empirical results demonstrate that our method is accurate and scalable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2736277.2741136

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Identifying organic ASO activities is an open problem due to the ability of such workers to evade existing detection solutions.

    “Identifying organic ASO activities is an open problem due to the ability of such workers to evade existing detection solutions, e.g., that leverage lockstep behaviors [32, 43, 51, 72, 73, 78, 85, 86, 89, 92, 93] or review bursts [27, 28, 35, 39, 40, 42, 44, 45, 50-53, 53, 5759, 65, 66, 84, 87, 88, 92].”

    From RacketStore (2021) · cites this paper as [78]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tian, T., Zhu, J., Xia, F., Zhuang, X., & Zhang, T.
Affiliations
  • State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems (CN)
  • Baidu (China) (CN)
Venue
Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web
Published
2015-05-18
Pages
1100-1110
OpenAlex
W2235660311
Cited by
67
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
6.08
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China (2013CB329403)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61322308, 61332007)
  • Tsinghua National Laboratory for Information Science and Technology Big Data Initiative
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Data Mining and Analysis
Keywords
crowdsourcing, search engine advertising, click fraud, nonparametric clustering, parallel scalability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review