The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
GeoSoCa: Exploiting Geographical, Social and Categorical Correlations for Point-of-Interest Recommendations
Abstract
Recommending users with their preferred points-of-interest (POIs), e.g., museums and restaurants, has become an important feature for location-based social networks (LBSNs), which benefits people to explore new places and businesses to discover potential customers. However, because users only check in a few POIs in an LBSN, the user-POI check-in interaction is highly sparse, which renders a big challenge for POI recommendations. To tackle this challenge, in this study we propose a new POI recommendation approach called GeoSoCa through exploiting geographical correlations, social correlations and categorical correlations among users and POIs. The geographical, social and categorical correlations can be learned from the historical check-in data of users on POIs and utilized to predict the relevance score of a user to an unvisited POI so as to make recommendations for users. First, in GeoSoCa we propose a kernel estimation method with an adaptive bandwidth to determine a personalized check-in distribution of POIs for each user that naturally models the geographical correlations between POIs. Then, GeoSoCa aggregates the check-in frequency or rating of a user's friends on a POI and models the social check-in frequency or rating as a power-law distribution to employ the social correlations between users. Further, GeoSoCa applies the bias of a user on a POI category to weigh the popularity of a POI in the corresponding category and models the weighed popularity as a power-law distribution to leverage the categorical correlations between POIs. Finally, we conduct a comprehensive performance evaluation for GeoSoCa using two large-scale real-world check-in data sets collected from Foursquare and Yelp. Experimental results show that GeoSoCa achieves significantly superior recommendation quality compared to other state-of-the-art POI recommendation techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
Silverman, B. W. (2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781315140919 · Cited by 15,796
Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis
(1986) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3324-9 · Cited by 8,525
Exploiting geographical influence for collaborative point-of-interest recommendation
Ye, M., Yin, P., Lee, W.-C., & Lee, D.-L. (2011) · Proceedings of the 34th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/2009916.2009962 · Cited by 1,111
Tobler's First Law and Spatial Analysis
Miller, H. J. (2004) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402005.x · Cited by 901
Time-aware point-of-interest recommendation
Yuan, Q., Cong, G., Ma, Z., Sun, A., & Thalmann, N. M. (2013) · Proceedings of the 36th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/2484028.2484030 · Cited by 754
Location-based and preference-aware recommendation using sparse geo-social networking data
Bao, J., Zheng, Y., & Mokbel, M. F. (2012) · Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems · doi:10.1145/2424321.2424348 · Cited by 671
GeoMF: joint geographical modeling and matrix factorization for point-of-interest recommendation
Lian, D., Zhao, C., Xie, X., Sun, G., Chen, E., & Rui, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623638 · Cited by 608
Where you like to go next: successive point-of-interest recommendation
Chen, C., Yang, H., Lyu, M. R.-T., & King, I. (2013) · International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence · Cited by 529
Exploring temporal effects for location recommendation on location-based social networks
Gao, H., Tang, J., Hu, X., & Liu, H. (2013) · Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Recommender systems · doi:10.1145/2507157.2507182 · Cited by 513
Learning geographical preferences for point-of-interest recommendation
Liu, B., Fu, Y., Yao, Z., & Xiong, H. (2013) · Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/2487575.2487673 · Cited by 437
Cited by
Yang, C., Bai, L., Zhang, C., Yuan, Q., & Han, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/3097983.3098094 · Cited by 286
An attention‐based category‐aware GRU model for the next POI recommendation
Liu, Y., Pei, A., Wang, F., Yang, Y., Zhang, X., Wang, H., Dai, H., Qi, L., & Ma, R. (2021) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.22412 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, J.-D., & Chow, C.-Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2015-08-09
- Pages
- 443-452
- OpenAlex
- W2084677224
- Cited by
- 288
- References
- 31
- FWCI
- 29.53
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: GeoSoCa: Exploiting Geographical, Social and Categorical Correlations for Point-of-Interest Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2766462.2767711
- The paper
- Zhang, J.-D., & Chow, C.-Y. (2015). GeoSoCa: Exploiting Geographical, Social and Categorical Correlations for Point-of-Interest Recommendations. Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. https://doi.org/10.1145/2766462.2767711
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.