Cited by 7Advanced Software Engineering MethodologiesModel-Driven Software Engineering TechniquesSoftware Engineering Research

Architectural Consistency Checking in Plugin-Based Software Systems

Open access
Greifenberg, Timo, Müller, Klaus, Rumpe, Bernhard·2015·Proceedings of the 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops

Abstract

Manually ensuring that the implementation of a software system is consistent with the software architecture is a laborious and error-prone task. Thus, a variety of approaches towards automated consistency checking have been developed to counteract architecture erosion. However, these approaches lack means to define and check architectural restrictions concerning plugin dependencies, which is required for plugin-based software systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2797433.2797493

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dependency related architectural smells are the most frequently mentioned architectural smells in the interviews, including cyclic, undesired and unstable dependencies.

    “Dependency related architectural smells are the most frequently mentioned architectural smells in our interviews (P3a-b, P3d, P3f-g, P4a, P4c-d, P11a, P19b), including cyclic, undesired and unstable dependencies [33].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Greifenberg, T., Müller, K., & Rumpe, B.
Affiliations
  • RWTH Aachen University (DE)
  • Software Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, http://www.se-rwth.de
Venue
Proceedings of the 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-09-07
Pages
1-7
OpenAlex
W1993638496
Cited by
7
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
Keywords
software architecture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review