Cited by 185Spam and Phishing DetectionMisinformation and Its ImpactsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

Detecting Clusters of Fake Accounts in Online Social Networks

Xiao, Cao, Freeman, David Mandell, Hwa, Theodore·2015·Proceedings of the 8th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security

Abstract

Fake accounts are a preferred means for malicious users of online social networks to send spam, commit fraud, or otherwise abuse the system. A single malicious actor may create dozens to thousands of fake accounts in order to scale their operation to reach the maximum number of legitimate members. Detecting and taking action on these accounts as quickly as possible is imperative in order to protect legitimate members and maintain the trustworthiness of the network. However, any individual fake account may appear to be legitimate on first inspection, for example by having a real-sounding name or a believable profile.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2808769.2808779

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Xiao, C., Freeman, D. M., & Hwa, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • LinkedIn (United States) (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the 8th ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security
Publisher
ACM
Published
2015-10-16
Pages
91-101
OpenAlex
W1978054023
Cited by
184
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
15.35
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ACM Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Security (AISec) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
fake accounts, social networking sites, malicious user detection, spam, fraud, network trustworthiness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review