The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IronFleet: proving practical distributed systems correct
Abstract
Distributed systems are notorious for harboring subtle bugs. Verification can, in principle, eliminate these bugs a priori, but verification has historically been difficult to apply at full-program scale, much less distributed-system scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chord: A scalable peer-to-peer lookup service for internet applications
Stoica, I., Morris, R., Karger, D., Kaashoek, M. F., & Balakrishnan, H. (2001) · Proceedings of the 2001 conference on Applications, technologies, architectures, and protocols for computer communications · doi:10.1145/383059.383071 · Cited by 9,623
de Moura, L., & Bjørner, N. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78800-3_24 · Cited by 6,595
Impossibility of distributed consensus with one faulty process
Fischer, M. J., Lynch, N. A., & Paterson, M. S. (1985) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3149.214121 · Cited by 4,579
An axiomatic basis for computer programming
Hoare, C. A. R. (1969) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/363235.363259 · Cited by 4,002
Lamport, L. (1998) · ACM Transactions on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/279227.279229 · Cited by 2,737
Practical byzantine fault tolerance and proactive recovery
Castro, M., & Liskov, B. (2002) · ACM Transactions on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/571637.571640 · Cited by 2,475
In search of an understandable consensus algorithm
Ongaro, D., & Ousterhout, J. K. (2014) · Cited by 1,909
Lamport, L. (1994) · ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems · doi:10.1145/177492.177726 · Cited by 1,843
ZooKeeper: wait-free coordination for internet-scale systems
Hunt, P. G., Konar, M., Junqueira, F., & Reed, B. C. (2010) · Cited by 1,357
Assigning Meanings to Programs
Floyd, R. W. (1993) · Studies in Cognitive Systems · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1793-7_4 · Cited by 1,079
Cited by
Using Crash Hoare logic for certifying the FSCQ file system
Chen, H., Ziegler, D., Chajed, T., Chlipala, A., Kaashoek, M. F., & Zeldovich, N. (2015) · Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles · doi:10.1145/2815400.2815402 · Cited by 211
SoK: Computer-Aided Cryptography
Barbosa, M., Barthe, G., Bhargavan, K., Blanchet, B., Cremers, C., Liao, K., & Parno, B. (2021) · 2021 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) · doi:10.1109/sp40001.2021.00008 · Cited by 143
Self-citationTowards AI-Assisted Synthesis of Verified Dafny Methods
Misu, M. R. H., Lopes, C. V., Ma, I., & Noble, J. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering · doi:10.1145/3643763 · Cited by 38
A survey on verification strategies for intelligent transportation systems
Schmidtke, H. R. (2018) · Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments · doi:10.1007/s40860-018-0070-5 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Hawblitzel, C., Howell, J., Kapritsos, M., Lorch, J. R., Parno, B., Roberts, M. L., Setty, S., & Zill, B.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2015-10-04
- Pages
- 1-17
- OpenAlex
- W2091776255
- Cited by
- 320
- References
- 43
- FWCI
- 32.79
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IronFleet: proving practical distributed systems correct. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2815400.2815428
- The paper
- Hawblitzel, C., Howell, J., Kapritsos, M., Lorch, J. R., Parno, B., Roberts, M. L., Setty, S., & Zill, B. (2015). IronFleet: proving practical distributed systems correct. Proceedings of the 25th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. https://doi.org/10.1145/2815400.2815428
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.