The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A framework for identifying software project risks
Open accessAbstract
article Free Access Share on A framework for identifying software project risks Authors: Mark Keil Georgia State Univ., Atlanta Georgia State Univ., AtlantaView Profile , Paul E. Cule Marquette Univ., Milwaukee, WI Marquette Univ., Milwaukee, WIView Profile , Kalle Lyytinen Univ. of Jyvaäskylä, Finland Univ. of Jyvaäskylä, FinlandView Profile , Roy C. Schmidt Bradley Univ., Peoria, IL Bradley Univ., Peoria, ILView Profile Authors Info & Claims Communications of the ACMVolume 41Issue 11Nov. 1998 pp 76–83https://doi.org/10.1145/287831.287843Published:01 November 1998Publication History 371citation14,130DownloadsMetricsTotal Citations371Total Downloads14,130Last 12 Months577Last 6 weeks153 Get Citation AlertsNew Citation Alert added!This alert has been successfully added and will be sent to:You will be notified whenever a record that you have chosen has been cited.To manage your alert preferences, click on the button below.Manage my Alerts New Citation Alert!Please log in to your account Save to BinderSave to BinderCreate a New BinderNameCancelCreateExport CitationPublisher SiteeReaderPDF
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Design Science in Information Systems Research1
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/25148625 · Cited by 10,707
Design science in information systems research
(2004) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/2017212.2017217 · Cited by 8,254
Risk factors in enterprise-wide/ERP projects
Sumner, M. (2000) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/026839620001500407 · Cited by 559
Management challenges in creating value from business analytics
Vidgen, R., Shaw, S., & Grant, D. B. (2017) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2017.02.023 · Cited by 493
Research on information systems failures and successes: Status update and future directions
Dwivedi, Y. K., Wastell, D., Laumer, S., Henriksen, H. Z., Myers, M. D., Bunker, D., Elbanna, A., Ravishankar, M. N., & Srivastava, S. C. (2015) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-014-9500-y · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Keil, M., Cule, P. E., Lyytinen, K., & Schmidt, R. C.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 76-83
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W1976909194
- Cited by
- 698
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A framework for identifying software project risks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/287831.287843
- The paper
- Keil, M., Cule, P. E., Lyytinen, K., & Schmidt, R. C. (1998). A framework for identifying software project risks. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/287831.287843
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
