The DOI matches its Crossref record.
When CSI Meets Public WiFi: Inferring Your Mobile Phone Password via WiFi Signals
Abstract
In this study, we present WindTalker, a novel and practical keystroke inference framework that allows an attacker to infer the sensitive keystrokes on a mobile device through WiFi-based side-channel information. WindTalker is motivated from the observation that keystrokes on mobile devices will lead to different hand coverage and the finger motions, which will introduce a unique interference to the multi-path signals and can be reflected by the channel state information (CSI). The adversary can exploit the strong correlation between the CSI fluctuation and the keystrokes to infer the user's number input. WindTalker presents a novel approach to collect the target's CSI data by deploying a public WiFi hotspot. Compared with the previous keystroke inference approach, WindTalker neither deploys external devices close to the target device nor compromises the target device. Instead, it utilizes the public WiFi to collect user's CSI data, which is easy-to-deploy and difficult-to-detect. In addition, it jointly analyzes the traffic and the CSI to launch the keystroke inference only for the sensitive period where password entering occurs. WindTalker can be launched without the requirement of visually seeing the smart phone user's input process, backside motion, or installing any malware on the tablet. We implemented Windtalker on several mobile phones and performed a detailed case study to evaluate the practicality of the password inference towards Alipay, the largest mobile payment platform in the world. The evaluation results show that the attacker can recover the key with a high successful rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
WiFi Sensing with Channel State Information: A Survey
Ma, Y., Zhou, G., & Wang, S. (2020) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3310194 · Cited by 869
Wireless Sensing for Human Activity: A Survey
Liu, J., Liu, H., Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, C. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2019.2934489 · Cited by 414
Self-citationShafiq, M., Tian, Z., Sun, Y., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2020) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2020.02.017 · Cited by 384
Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA): A Comprehensive Survey
Syed, N. F., Shah, S. W., Shaghaghi, A., Anwar, A., Baig, Z., & Doss, R. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3174679 · Cited by 406
“Moreover, well-crafted, ‘‘strong’’ passwords are also prone to hacking and can be inferred by conducting sophisticated side channel attacks such as those mentioned in [7]–[9].”
BackgroundIoT malicious traffic identification using wrapper-based feature selection mechanisms
Shafiq, M., Tian, Z., Bashir, A. K., Du, X., & Guizani, M. (2020) · Computers & Security · doi:10.1016/j.cose.2020.101863 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Li, M., Meng, Y., Liu, J., Zhu, H., Liang, X., Liu, Y., & Ruan, N.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-10-24
- Pages
- 1068-1079
- OpenAlex
- W2534482106
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.52
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When CSI Meets Public WiFi: Inferring Your Mobile Phone Password via WiFi Signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2976749.2978397
- The paper
- Li, M., Meng, Y., Liu, J., Zhu, H., Liang, X., Liu, Y., & Ruan, N. (2016). When CSI Meets Public WiFi: Inferring Your Mobile Phone Password via WiFi Signals. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978397
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.