The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Instability of Bitcoin Without the Block Reward
Abstract
Bitcoin provides two incentives for miners: block rewards and transaction fees. The former accounts for the vast majority of miner revenues at the beginning of the system, but it is expected to transition to the latter as the block rewards dwindle. There has been an implicit belief that whether miners are paid by block rewards or transaction fees does not affect the security of the block chain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
Wright, C. S. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3440802 · Cited by 13,922
(2002) · doi:10.1137/s0097539701398375 · Cited by 2,275
The Weighted Majority Algorithm
Littlestone, N., & Warmuth, M. K. (1994) · Information and Computation · doi:10.1006/inco.1994.1009 · Cited by 1,975
Majority Is Not Enough: Bitcoin Mining Is Vulnerable
Eyal, I., & Sirer, E. G. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-45472-5_28 · Cited by 1,375
A Simple Adaptive Procedure Leading to Correlated Equilibrium
Hart, S., & Mas-Colell, A. (2000) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/1468-0262.00153 · Cited by 1,088
Evaluating user privacy in bitcoin
Androulaki, E., Karame, G. O., Roeschlin, M., Scherer, T., & Capkun, S. (2013) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39884-1_4 · Cited by 700
The Economics of Bitcoin Mining, or Bitcoin in the Presence of Adversaries
Kroll, J. A., Davey, I. C., & Felten, E. W. (2013) · Cited by 514
Stubborn Mining: Generalizing Selfish Mining and Combining with an Eclipse Attack
Nayak, K., Kumar, S., Miller, A., & Shi, E. (2016) · 2016 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P) · doi:10.1109/eurosp.2016.32 · Cited by 481
Optimal Selfish Mining Strategies in Bitcoin
Sapirshtein, A., Sompolinsky, Y., & Zohar, A. (2017) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54970-4_30 · Cited by 477
Eyal, I. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2015.13 · Cited by 376
Cited by
Blockchain without waste: Proof-of-stake
Saleh, F. (2021) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhaa075 · Cited by 825
Smart contract applications within blockchain technology: a systematic mapping study
Macrinici, D., Cartofeanu, C., & Gao, S. (2018) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2018.10.004 · Cited by 458
SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi)
Werner, S., Perez, D., Gudgeon, L., Klages-Mundt, A., Harz, D., & Knottenbelt, W. (2022) · Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies · doi:10.1145/3558535.3559780 · Cited by 404
Measurement and Analysis of the Bitcoin Networks: A View from Mining Pools
Wang, C., Chu, X., & Qin, Y. (2020) · 2020 6th International Conference on Big Data Computing and Communications (BIGCOM) · doi:10.1109/bigcom51056.2020.00032 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Carlsten, M., Kalodner, H., Weinberg, S. M., & Narayanan, A.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-10-24
- Pages
- 154-167
- OpenAlex
- W2535029869
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 29.06
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Instability of Bitcoin Without the Block Reward. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/2976749.2978408
- The paper
- Carlsten, M., Kalodner, H., Weinberg, S. M., & Narayanan, A. (2016). On the Instability of Bitcoin Without the Block Reward. Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.