Cited by 8Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace and Expression RecognitionFace recognition and analysis

Automatic emotion recognition in the wild using an ensemble of static and dynamic representations

Ghazi, Mostafa Mehdipour, Ekenel, Hazım Kemal·2016·Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

Abstract

Automatic emotion recognition in the wild video datasets is a very challenging problem because of the inter-class similarities among different facial expressions and large intra-class variabilities due to the significant changes in illumination, pose, scene, and expression. In this paper, we present our proposed method for video-based emotion recognition in the EmotiW 2016 challenge. The task considers the unconstrained emotion recognition problem by training from short video clips extracted from movies and testing on short movie clips and spontaneous video clips of the reality TV data. Four different methods are employed to extract both static and dynamic emotion representations from the videos. First, local binary patterns of three orthogonal planes are used to describe spatiotemporal features of the video frames. Second, principal component analysis is applied to the image patches in a two-stage convolutional network to learn weights and extract facial features from the aligned faces. Third, the deep convolutional neural network model of VGG-Face is deployed to extract deep facial representations from aligned faces. Fourth, a bag of visual words is computed based on dense scale-invariant feature transform descriptors from aligned face images to form hand-crafted representations. Support vector machines are then utilized to train and classify the obtained spatiotemporal representations and facial features. Finally, score-level fusion is applied to combine the classification results and predict the emotion labels of the video clips. The results show that the proposed combined method has outperformed all the utilized techniques with the overall validations and test accuracies of 43.13% and 40.13%, respectively. This system, is relatively a good classifier in Happy and Angry emotion categories and is unsuccessful in detecting Surprise, Disgust, and Fear.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/2993148.2997634

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ghazi, M. M., & Ekenel, H. K.
Affiliations
  • Sabancı Üniversitesi (TR)
  • Istanbul Technical University (TR)
Venue
Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
Publisher
ACM
Published
2016-10-31
Pages
514-521
OpenAlex
W2547263832
Cited by
8
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.77
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION (publishedVersion)
  • Istanbul Technical University Academic Open Archive (Istanbul Technical University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • TUBITAK (113E067)
  • Marie Curie 7th EU Framework Programme (MMFP)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
automatic emotion recognition, video-based emotion recognition, facial expression recognition, local binary pattern, spatio-temporal features, facial feature extraction, VGG-Face, bag of visual words, SIFT descriptors, score-level fusion, ensemble learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review