HoloNet: towards robust emotion recognition in the wild
Abstract
In this paper, we present HoloNet, a well-designed Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture regarding our submissions to the video based sub-challenge of the Emotion Recognition in the Wild (EmotiW) 2016 challenge. In contrast to previous related methods that usually adopt relatively simple and shallow neural network architectures to address emotion recognition task, our HoloNet has three critical considerations in network design. (1) To reduce redundant filters and enhance the non-saturated non-linearity in the lower convolutional layers, we use a modified Concatenated Rectified Linear Unit (CReLU) instead of ReLU. (2) To enjoy the accuracy gain from considerably increased network depth and maintain efficiency, we combine residual structure and CReLU to construct the middle layers. (3) To broaden network width and introduce multi-scale feature extraction property, the topper layers are designed as a variant of inception-residual structure. The main benefit of grouping these modules into the HoloNet is that both negative and positive phase information implicitly contained in the input data can flow over it in multiple paths, thus deep multi-scale features explicitly capturing emotion variation can be well extracted from multi-path sibling layers, and then can be further concatenated for robust recognition. We obtain competitive results in this year’s video based emotion recognition sub-challenge using an ensemble of two HoloNet models trained with given data only. Specifically, we obtain a mean recognition rate of 57.84%, outperforming the baseline accuracy with an absolute margin of 17.37%, and yielding 4.04% absolute accuracy gain compared to the result of last year’s winner team. Meanwhile, our method runs with a speed of several thousands of frames per second on a GPU, thus it is well applicable to real-time scenarios.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simple adjustment of face rotation and facial feature point alignment is reported to improve model accuracy (e.g., from 54% to 62% in [94]).
“Simple adjustment of face rotation and facial feature point alignment is reported to improve model accuracy (e.g., from 54% to 62% in [94]; see also [15], [99]).”
From Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [99]
Improvements in accuracy are reported when following the approach of acquiring large models pre-trained for object classification, freezing lower-level layers, and fine-tuning higher-level layers for affect recognition (e.g., from 39% to 42% in [89]).
“Improvements in accuracy are reported when following this approach (e.g., from 39% to 42% in [89]; see also [99], [92]).”
From Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [99]
Appearance features can be extended for spatio-temporal representation by considering a third orthogonal plane.
“Appearance features can be extended for spatio-temporal representation by considering a third orthogonal plane [96], [99].”
From Deep learning for human affect recognition: Insights and new developments (2021) · cites this paper as [99]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 115
- Authors
- Yao, A., Cai, D., Hu, P., Wang, S., Sha, L., & Chen, Y.
- Affiliations
- Intel (United States) (US)
- Beihang University (CN)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2016-10-31
- Pages
- 472-478
- OpenAlex
- W2548899748
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 16.19
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
- Keywords
- convolutional neural network architecture, skip connections, multi-scale feature extraction, neural network ensembles, video-based emotion recognition, real-time emotion recognition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review