The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A hierarchical approach to wrapper induction
Open accessAbstract
With the tremendous amount of information that becomes available on the Web on a daily basis, the ability to quickly develop information agents has become a crucial problem.A vital component of any Web-based information agent is a set of wrappers that can extract the relevant data from semistructured information sources.Our novel approach to wrapper induction is based on the idea of hierarchical information extraction, which turns the hard problem of extracting data from an arbitrarily complex document into a series of easier extraction tasks.We introduce an inductive algorithm, STALKER, that generates high accuracy extraction rules based on user-labeled training examples.Labeling the training data represents the major bottleneck in using wrapper induction techniques, and our experimental results show that STALKER does significantly better then other approaches; on one hand, STALKER requires up to two orders of magnitude fewer examples than other algorithms, while on the other hand it can handle information sources that could not be wrapped by existing techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning Information Extraction Rules for Semi-Structured and Free Text
Soderland, S. (1999) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007562322031 · Cited by 934
The TSIMMIS project: Integration of heterogeneous information sources
Chawathe, S. S., García-Molina, H., Hammer, J., Ireland, K., Yannis Papakonstantinou, D., Ullman, J. D., & Widom, J. (1994) · Cited by 924
Information extraction from HTML: application of a general machine learning approach
Freitag, D. (1998) · Cited by 236
Atzeni, P., & Mecca, G. (1997) · Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM SIGACT-SIGMOD-SIGART symposium on Principles of database systems · doi:10.1145/263661.263678 · Cited by 182
Semistructured and structured data in the Web: going back and forth
Atzeni, P., Mecca, G., & Paolo Merialdo, A. (1997) · ACM SIGMOD Record · doi:10.1145/271074.271080 · Cited by 100
Cited by
(2005) · Cited by 3,125
Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the Web
Liu, B., Hu, M., & Cheng, J. (2005) · Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web - WWW '05 · doi:10.1145/1060745.1060797 · Cited by 1,597
Sarawagi, S. (2008) · Foundations and Trends in Databases · doi:10.1561/1900000003 · Cited by 707
Wrapper induction: Efficiency and expressiveness
Kushmerick, N. (2000) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/s0004-3702(99)00100-9 · Cited by 553
IEPAD: information extraction based on pattern discovery
Chang, C.-H., & Lui, S.-C. (2001) · Proceedings of the 10th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/371920.372182 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Muslea, I., Minton, S., & Knoblock, C.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the third annual conference on Autonomous Agents
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 1999-04
- Pages
- 190-197
- OpenAlex
- W2153072229
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 26.18
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A hierarchical approach to wrapper induction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/301136.301191
- The paper
- Muslea, I., Minton, S., & Knoblock, C. (1999). A hierarchical approach to wrapper induction. Proceedings of the third annual conference on Autonomous Agents. https://doi.org/10.1145/301136.301191
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.