The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Information Extraction
Abstract
The automatic extraction of information from unstructured sources has opened up new avenues for querying, organizing, and analyzing data by drawing upon the clean semantics of structured databases and the abundance of unstructured data. The field of information extraction has its genesis in the natural language processing community where the primary impetus came from competitions centered around the recognition of named entities like people names and organization from news articles. As society became more data oriented with easy online access to both structured and unstructured data, new applications of structure extraction came around. Now, there is interest in converting our personal desktops to structured databases, the knowledge in scientific publications to structured records, and harnessing the Internet for structured fact finding queries. Consequently, there are many different communities of researchers bringing in techniques from machine learning, databases, information retrieval, and computational linguistics for various aspects of the information extraction problem. This review is a survey of information extraction research of over two decades from these diverse communities. We create a taxonomy of the field along various dimensions derived from the nature of the extraction task, the techniques used for extraction, the variety of input resources exploited, and the type of output produced. We elaborate on rule-based and statistical methods for entity and relationship extraction. In each case we highlight the different kinds of models for capturing the diversity of clues driving the recognition process and the algorithms for training and efficiently deploying the models. We survey techniques for optimizing the various steps in an information extraction pipeline, adapting to dynamic data, integrating with existing entities and handling uncertainty in the extraction process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
Conditional Random Fields: Probabilistic Models for Segmenting and Labeling Sequence Data
Lafferty, J., McCallum, A., & Pereira, F. C. N. (2001) · ScholarlyCommons (University of Pennsylvania) · Cited by 12,935
On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization
Liu, D. C., & Nocedal, J. (1989) · Mathematical Programming · doi:10.1007/bf01589116 · Cited by 8,560
Opinion mining and sentiment analysis
Pang, B., & Lee, L. (2008) · Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1561/1500000011 · Cited by 6,372
Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora
Hearst, M. A. (1992) · Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics - · doi:10.3115/992133.992154 · Cited by 3,253
Incorporating non-local information into information extraction systems by Gibbs sampling
Finkel, J. R., Grenager, T., & Manning, C. (2005) · Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics - ACL '05 · doi:10.3115/1219840.1219885 · Cited by 3,008
Introduction to the CoNLL-2003 Shared Task: Language-Independent Named Entity Recognition
Tjong Kim Sang, E. F., & De Meulder, F. (2003) · Proceedings of the seventh conference on Natural language learning at HLT-NAACL 2003 - · doi:10.3115/1119176.1119195 · Cited by 2,788
Yago: a core of semantic knowledge
Suchanek, F. M., Kasneci, G., & Weikum, G. (2007) · Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/1242572.1242667 · Cited by 2,512
Fellegi, I. P., & Sunter, A. B. (1969) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1969.10501049 · Cited by 2,475
Fast discovery of association rules
Agrawal, R., Mannila, H., Srikant, R., Toivonen, H. T. T., & Verkamo, A. I. (1996) · Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · Cited by 2,376
Cited by
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Liu, B. (2012) · Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02145-9 · Cited by 3,281
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Zhang, L., & Liu, B. (2017) · Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7687-1_907 · Cited by 3,260
Clinical information extraction applications: A literature review
Wang, Y., Wang, L., Rastegar-Mojarad, M., Moon, S., Shen, F., Afzal, N., Liu, S., Zeng, Y., Mehrabi, S., Sohn, S., et al. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2017.11.011 · Cited by 910
Web data extraction, applications and techniques: A survey
Ferrara, E., De Meo, P., Fiumara, G., & Baumgartner, R. (2014) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2014.07.007 · Cited by 396
Recent Named Entity Recognition and Classification techniques: A systematic review
Goyal, A., Gupta, V., & Kumar, M. (2018) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2018.06.001 · Cited by 309
Metadata
- Authors
- Sarawagi, S.
- Venue
- Foundations and Trends in Databases
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-11-30
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 261-377
- ISSN
- 1931-7883 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-7891
- OpenAlex
- W2913389685
- Cited by
- 707
- References
- 150
- FWCI
- 71.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Information Extraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1561/1900000003
- The paper
- Sarawagi, S. (2008). Information Extraction. Foundations and Trends in Databases. https://doi.org/10.1561/1900000003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.