Cited by 72Innovative Human-Technology InteractionMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Identification and Classification of Usage Patterns in Long-Term Activity Tracking

Meyer, Jochen, Wasmann, Merlin, Heuten, Wilko, El Ali, Abdallah, Boll, Susanne C.J.·2017·Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Activity trackers are frequently used in health and well-being, but their application in effective interventions is challenging. While research for reasons of use and non-use is ongoing, little is known about the way activity trackers are used in everyday life and over longer periods. We analyzed data of 104 individuals over 14,413 use days, and in total over 2.5 years. We describe general tracker use, periodic changes and overall changes over time, and identify characteristic patterns. While the use of trackers shows large individual heterogeneity, from our findings we could identify and classify general patterns for activity tracker use such as try-and-drop, slow-starter, experimenter, hop-on hop-off, intermittent and power user. Our findings contribute to the body of knowledge towards the successful design of effective health technologies, health interventions, and long-term health applications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3025453.3025690

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a potential for unmeasured confounding in the analyses because the study was not able to account for an exhaustive list of potential confounders such as job status, environmental factors, and differences in usage patterns between participants over time.

    “Further, there is a potential for unmeasured confounding in our analyses because we were not able to account for an exhaustive list of potential confounders such as job status, environmental factors and differences in the usage patterns between participants over time17.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meyer, J., Wasmann, M., Heuten, W., El Ali, A., & Boll, S. C. J.
Affiliations
  • Oldenburger Institut für Informatik (DE)
  • Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, Germany
  • Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-05-02
Pages
667-678
OpenAlex
W2611061514
Cited by
72
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5
FWCI
7.44
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01EL1422C)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
wearable activity trackers, usage patterns, long-term tracking, user heterogeneity, health interventions, health technology design, power users

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review