The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Footprints: history-rich tools for information foraging
Abstract
Inspired by Hill and Hollans original work [7], we have been developing a theory of interaction history and building tools to apply this theory to navigation in a complex information space. We have built a series of tools - map, paths, annota- tions and signposts - based on a physical-world navigation metaphor. These tools have been in use for over a year. Our user study involved a controlled browse task and showed that users were able to get the same amount of work done with significantly less effort.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hutchins, E. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 · Cited by 10,801
Cited by
Evaluating collaborative filtering recommender systems
Herlocker, J. L., Konstan, J. A., Terveen, L. G., & Riedl, J. T. (2004) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/963770.963772 · Cited by 5,798
Strong concepts: Intermediate-level knowledge in interaction design research
Höök, K., & Löwgren, J. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2362364.2362371 · Cited by 540
Profiles as Conversation: Networked Identity Performance on Friendster
Boyd, D., & Heer, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06) · doi:10.1109/hicss.2006.394 · Cited by 399
Automatically generating personalized user interfaces with Supple
Gajos, K. Z., Weld, D. S., & Wobbrock, J. O. (2010) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2010.05.005 · Cited by 317
Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia
Priedhorsky, R., Chen, J., Lam, S. (. K., Panciera, K., Terveen, L., & Riedl, J. (2007) · Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on Conference on supporting group work - GROUP '07 · doi:10.1145/1316624.1316663 · Cited by 218
An Information Foraging Theory Perspective on Tools for Debugging, Refactoring, and Reuse Tasks
Fleming, S. D., Scaffidi, C., Piorkowski, D., Burnett, M., Bellamy, R., Lawrance, J., & Kwan, I. (2013) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/2430545.2430551 · Cited by 79
The new trends in adaptive educational hypermedia systems
Somyürek, S. (2015) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1946 · Cited by 54
Program navigation analysis to support task-aware software development environments
Robillard, M. P. (2004) · "Workshop on Directions in Software Engineering Environments (WoDiSEE2004)" W2S Workshop - 26th International Conference on Software Engineering · doi:10.1049/ic:20040215 · Cited by 11
Understanding and Improving Navigation Within Electronic Documents
Alexander, J. (2009) · University of Canterbury. Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering · doi:10.26021/2671 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Wexelblat, A., & Maes, P.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems the CHI is the limit - CHI '99
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 270-277
- OpenAlex
- W2131567213
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.48
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
