The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
User-centered security
Open accessAbstract
We introduce the term user-centered security to refer to security models, mechanisms, systems, and software that have usability as a primary motivation or goal.We discuss the history of usable secure systems, citing both past problems and present studies.We develop three categories for work in user-friendly security: applying usability testing and techniques to secure systems, developing security models and mechanisms for user-friendly systems, and considering user needs as a primary design goal at the start of secure system development.We discuss our work on user-centered authorization, which started with a rules-based authorization engine (MAP) and will continue with Adage.We outline the lessons we have learned to date and how they apply to our future work.We evaluate the pros and cons of this effort, as a precursor to further work in this area, and include a brief description of our current work in user-centered authorization.As our conclusion points out, we hope to see more work in user-centered security in the future; work that enables users to choose and use the protection they want, that matches their intuitions about security and privacy, and that supports the policies that teams and organizations need and use to get their work done. II. USABILITY IN
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The protection of information in computer systems
Saltzer, J. H., & Schroeder, M. D. (1975) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1975.9939 · Cited by 2,126
Cited by
So long, and no thanks for the externalities: the rational rejection of security advice by users
Herley, C. (2009) · Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on New security paradigms workshop · doi:10.1145/1719030.1719050 · Cited by 524
Separation of duty in role-based environments
Simon, R. T., & Zurko, M. E. (2002) · Proceedings 10th Computer Security Foundations Workshop · doi:10.1109/csfw.1997.596811 · Cited by 349
Self-citationWest, R. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1330311.1330320 · Cited by 311
The compliance budget: managing security behaviour in organisations
Beautement, A., Sasse, M. A., & Wonham, M. (2008) · Proceedings of the 2008 New Security Paradigms Workshop · doi:10.1145/1595676.1595684 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Zurko, M. E., & Simon, R. T.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 1996 workshop on New security paradigms - NSPW '96
- Publisher
- ACM Press
- Published
- 1996
- Pages
- 27-33
- OpenAlex
- W227840392
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.12
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: User-centered security. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/304851.304859
- The paper
- Zurko, M. E., & Simon, R. T. (1996). User-centered security. Proceedings of the 1996 workshop on New security paradigms - NSPW '96. https://doi.org/10.1145/304851.304859
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.