The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The compliance budget: managing security behaviour in organisations
Abstract
A significant number of security breaches result from employees' failure to comply with security policies. Many organizations have tried to change or influence security behaviour, but found it a major challenge. Drawing on previous research on usable security and economics of security, we propose a new approach to managing employee security behaviour. We conducted interviews with 17 employees from two major commercial organizations, asking why they do or don't comply with security policies. Our results show that key factors in the compliance decision are the actual and anticipated cost and benefits of compliance to the individual employee, and perceived cost and benefits to the organization. We present a new paradigm -- the Compliance Budget - as a means of understanding how individuals perceive the costs and benefits of compliance with organisational security goals, and identify a range of approaches that security managers can use to influence employee's perceptions (which, in turn, influence security behaviour). The Compliance Budget should be understood and managed in the same way as any financial budget, as compliance directly affects, and can place a cap on, effectiveness of organisational security measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,249
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983) · Cited by 5,190
Proceedings of the 11th USENIX Security Symposium
Boneh, D. (2002) · Cited by 2,528
Some observations on mental models
Norman, D. A. (1983) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,549
Adams, A., & Sasse, M. A. (1999) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/322796.322806 · Cited by 1,401
Self-citationSecrets and lies: digital security in a networked world
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-3941 · Cited by 1,159
Why Johnny can't encrypt: a usability evaluation of PGP 5.0
Whitten, A., & Tygar, J. D. (1999) · Cited by 1,082
Zurko, M. E., & Simon, R. T. (1996) · Proceedings of the 1996 workshop on New security paradigms - NSPW '96 · doi:10.1145/304851.304859 · Cited by 259
User Interaction Design for Secure Systems
Yee, K.-P. (2002) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-36159-6_24 · Cited by 210
Pretty good persuasion: a first step towards effective password security in the real world
Weirich, D., & Sasse, M. A. (2001) · Proceedings of the 2001 workshop on New security paradigms · doi:10.1145/508171.508195 · Cited by 159
Self-citation
Cited by
So long, and no thanks for the externalities: the rational rejection of security advice by users
Herley, C. (2009) · Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on New security paradigms workshop · doi:10.1145/1719030.1719050 · Cited by 524
The true cost of unusable password policies: password use in the wild
Inglesant, P. G., & Sasse, M. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/1753326.1753384 · Cited by 326
Self-citationChoice Architecture and Smartphone Privacy: There’s a Price for That
Egelman, S., Felt, A. P., & Wagner, D. (2013) · The Economics of Information Security and Privacy · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39498-0_10 · Cited by 131
(2016) · Symposium On Usable Privacy and Security · Cited by 123
Stajano, F. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25867-1_6 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Beautement, A., Sasse, M. A., & Wonham, M.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2008 New Security Paradigms Workshop
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2008-09-22
- Pages
- 47-58
- OpenAlex
- W2042720915
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The compliance budget: managing security behaviour in organisations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/1595676.1595684
- The paper
- Beautement, A., Sasse, M. A., & Wonham, M. (2008). The compliance budget: managing security behaviour in organisations. Proceedings of the 2008 New Security Paradigms Workshop. https://doi.org/10.1145/1595676.1595684
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.