The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 14 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Open accessAbstract
We trained a large, deep convolutional neural network to classify the 1.2 million high-resolution images in the ImageNet LSVRC-2010 contest into the 1000 different classes. On the test data, we achieved top-1 and top-5 error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively, which is considerably better than the previous state-of-the-art. The neural network, which has 60 million parameters and 650,000 neurons, consists of five convolutional layers, some of which are followed by max-pooling layers, and three fully connected layers with a final 1000-way softmax. To make training faster, we used non-saturating neurons and a very efficient GPU implementation of the convolution operation. To reduce overfitting in the fully connected layers we employed a recently developed regularization method called "dropout" that proved to be very effective. We also entered a variant of this model in the ILSVRC-2012 competition and achieved a winning top-5 test error rate of 15.3%, compared to 26.2% achieved by the second-best entry.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
29 No basis given · 22 Own result · 19 Own interpretation · 4 No full text of the sources · 3 Sources not found · 2 Supported · 2 Not checked yet · 1 Own method
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This technique reduces complex co adaptations of neurons, since a neuron cannot rely on the presence of particular other neurons.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012). source
The paper states on p. 1 that dropout prevents complex co-adaptations by randomly omitting hidden units, so a hidden unit cannot rely on other hidden units being present. This directly supports the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“There is, however, a very efficient version of model combination that only costs about a factor of two during training.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012). source
The paper describes dropout as an efficient way to combine many neural-network models (p. 1). In F.6 Training (p. 17), it reports that ImageNet training took roughly four days with dropout versus two days without it, supporting the approximate factor-of-two training cost. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scheme reduces our top-1 and top-5 error rates by 1.7% and 1.2%, respectively, as compared with a net with half as many kernels in each convolutional layer trained on one GPU.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.2. Training on multiple GPUs
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The size of our network made overfitting a significant problem, even with 1.2 million labeled training examples”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So these data augmentation schemes are, in effect, computationally free.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we found that removing any convolutional layer (each of which contains no more than 1% of the model's parameters) resulted in inferior performance.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scheme reduces the top-1 and top-5 error rates by 0.4% and 0.3%, respectively, as compared with the non overlapping scheme s = 2, z = 2, which produces output of equivalent dimensions.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This increases the size of our training set by a factor of 2048”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Deep CNNs with ReLUs train several times faster than their equivalents with tanh units.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.1. Rectified Linear Unit nonlinearity
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, we still find that the following local normalization scheme aids generalization.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 18
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the 1000 classes of ILSVRC make each training example impose 10 bits of constraint on the mapping from image to label, this turns out to be insufficient to learn so many parameters without considerable overfitting.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5. REDUCING OVERFITTING
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“though the resulting training examples are, of course, highly inter dependent.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the test data, we achieved top-1 and top-5 error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We generally observe during training that models with overlapping pooling find it slightly more difficult to overfit.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a four-layer CNN achieved a 13% test e r r o r r a t e w i t h o u t n o r m a l i z a t i o n a n d 1 1 % w i t h normalization.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“so we used several effective techniques for preventing overfitting”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Response normalization reduces our top-1 and top-5 error rates by 1.4% and 1.2%, respectively.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two-GPU net takes slightly less time to train than the one-GPU net.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.2. Training on multiple GPUs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our network contains a number of new and unusual features which improve its performance and reduce its training time”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without this scheme, our network suffers from substantial overfitting, which would have forced us to use much smaller networks.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, only other types of cat are considered plausible labels for the leopard.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This initialization accelerates the early stages of learning by providing the ReLUs with positive inputs.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 6. DETAILS OF LEARNING
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notice that at the pixel level, the retrieved training images are generally not close in L2 to the query images in the first column.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Training one CNN, with an extra sixth convolutional layer over the last pooling layer, to classify the entire ImageNet Fall 2011 release (15M images, 22K categories), and then”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our top-1 and top-5 error rates on this dataset are 67.4% and 40.9%, attained by the net described above but with an additional, sixth convolutional layer over the last pooling layer.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The Fall 2009 ImageNet split used by the authors, which differs from previous authors' splits, does not affect the results appreciably.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This kind of specialization occurs during every run and is independent of any particular random weight initialization (modulo a renumbering of the GPUs).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The magnitude of the effect demonstrated here varies with network architecture, but networks with ReLUs consistently learn several times faster than equivalents with saturating neurons.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 9. EPILOGUE
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our network achieves top-1 and top-5 test set error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 7. RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Averaging the predictions of five similar CNNs gives an error rate of 16.4%.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the remainder of this paragraph, we use validation and test error rates interchangeably because in our experience they do not differ by more than 0.1% (see Table 2).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notice that even off-center objects, such as the mite in the top-left, can be recognized by the net.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of our experiments suggest that our results can be improved simply by waiting for faster GPUs and bigger datasets to become available.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ReLUs have the desirable property that they do not require input normalization to prevent them from saturating.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) constitute one such class of models.9,15,17,19,21,26,32”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] 9. Fukushima, K. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biol. Cybern. 36, 4 (1980), 193-202. source
- Not checked yetcites [15] 15. Krizhevsky, A. Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10. Unpublished manuscript, 2010.
- Not checked yetcites [17] 17. LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J., Henderson, D., Howard, R., Hubbard, W., Jackel, L., et al. Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagation network. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (1990).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the immense complexity of the object recognition task means that this problem cannot be specified even by a dataset as large as ImageNet, so our model should also have lots of prior knowledge to compensate for all the data we do not have.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, compared to standard feedforward neural networks with similarly sized layers, CNNs have much fewer connections and parameters and so they are easier to train, while their theoretically best performance is likely to be only slightly worse.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“methods that require careful hand-engineering by a programmer who understands the domain do not scale as well as methods that replace the programmer with a powerful general-purpose learning procedure.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Luckily, current GPUs, paired with a highly optimized implementation of 2D convolution, are powerful enough to facilitate the training of interestinglylarge CNNs”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“they also make strong and mostly correct assumptions about the nature of images (namely, stationarity of statistics and locality of pixel dependencies).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the attractive qualities of CNNs, and despite the relative efficiency of their local architecture, they have still been prohibitively expensive to apply in large scale to highresolution images.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“ImageNet, 7 which consists of over 15 million labeled high-resolution images in over 22,000 categories.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [7] 7. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., Fei-Fei, L. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In CVPR09 (2009). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which is considerably better than the previous state-of-the-art”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With enough computation and enough data, learning beats programming for complicated tasks that require the integration of many different, noisy cues.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and recent datasets such as ImageNet contain enough labeled examples to train such models without severe overfitting.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for deep neural networks to shine, they needed far more labeled data and hugely more computation.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If at least some training examples produce a positive input to a ReLU, learning will happen in that neuron.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To learn about thousands of objects from millions of images, we need a model with a large learning capacity.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The constants k, n, α, and β are hyperparameters whose values are determined using a validation set”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, on this dataset the primary concern is preventing overfitting, so the effect they are observing is different from the accelerated ability to fit the training set which we report when using ReLUs.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.1. Rectified Linear Unit nonlinearity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“since then the best published results are 45.7% and 25.7% with an approach that averages the predictions of two classifiers trained on Fisher Vectors (FVs) computed from two types of densely sampled features.29”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 7. RESULTS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] 29. Sánchez, J., Perronnin, F. High- dimensional signature compression for large-scale image classification. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 (2011). IEEE, 1665-1672. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Combining the predictions of many different models is a very successful way to reduce test errors, 1, 3”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but it appears to be too expensive for big neural networks that already take several days to train.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The best published results on this dataset are 78.1% and 60.9%.23”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] 23. Mensink, T., Verbeek, J., Perronnin, F., Csurka, G. Metric learning for large scale image classification: Generalizing to new classes at near-zero cost. In ECCV -European Conference on Computer Vision (Florence, Italy, Oct. 2012). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Objects in realistic settings exhibit considerable variability.
“But objects in realistic settings exhibit considerable variability”
The paper relies on this without support.
Object identity is invariant to changes in the intensity and color of illumination.
“object identity is invariant to changes in the intensity and color of the illumination.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Fall 2009 ImageNet split used by the authors, which differs from previous authors' splits, does not affect the results appreciably.
“Since there is no established test set, our split necessarily differs from the splits used by previous authors, but this does not affect the results appreciably.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the field of DL, the CNN is the most famous and commonly employed algorithm [30, 71–75].”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Fully convolutional neural networks (fCNNs) have provided state-of-the-art performance for object classification and image segmentation (1).”
From Fully automated, real-time 3D ultrasound segmentation to estimate first trimester placental volume using deep learning (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The first wave saw the emergence of deep learning as the dominant paradigm for analyzing high-dimensional biological data.”
From The next paradigm in bioinformatics: a review of multi-agent systems and foundational models for end-to-end scientific discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Krizhevesky et al. [30] first proposed AlexNet and consequently improved the CNN learning ability by increasing its depth and implementing several parameter optimization strategies.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In deep CNN architecture, AlexNet is highly respected [30], as it achieved innovative results in the fields of image recognition and classification.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many CNN models, e.g. AlexNet [30], GoogleNet [103], and ResNet [37], have been trained on large datasets such as ImageNet for image recognition purposes.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To avoid model-specific biases, two different AI models, AlexNet [22] and VGG16 [38], were selected for classification.”
From Study on the Helpfulness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In particular, the choice of this specific size is based on the fact that the AlexNet 34 (and also similar CNN architectures) has been shown to offer satisfactory performances with an input matrix of that size or very similar, albeit for different types of problems with respect to the one presented in this work (e.g., image classification).”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Jung et al. [21] found that a reduction in accuracy does not occur when using only four bits for both weight and activation parameters, even for the ImageNet dataset [32].”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Feature-based approaches [17,18,19] commonly employ networks pre-trained on ImageNet [20] to map original images into a more distinguishable feature space. These methods are typically characterized by low training costs and outstanding performance.”
From An Unsupervised Method for Industrial Image Anomaly Detection with Vision Transformer-Based Autoencoder (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Over the past several years, the successes of deep learning on visual tasks has critically relied on convolutional neural networks [20, 16].”
From Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks? (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A common perception metric is the Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) which uses pre-trained deep neural network backbones such as VGG [9] and AlexNet [22].”
From MTReD: 3D Reconstruction Dataset for Fly-over Videos of Maritime Domain (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Starting with the the success of AlexNet [5] in the ILSVRC challenge [6] in 2012, deep learning models have been outperforming traditional approaches on a number of computer vision problems.”
From Satellite Pose Estimation Challenge: Dataset, Competition Design, and Results (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Unfortunately, it has been acknowledged that the performance of those hashing schemes may degrade significantly if the projected dimensions are imbalanced [4], [6], [13], i.e., their variances vary a lot.”
From Unsupervised Deep Video Hashing via Balanced Code for Large-Scale Video Retrieval (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“When convolutional RBMs are stacked together, they form convolutional deep belief networks [22].”
From Multimodal emotion recognition using deep learning architectures (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), built for spatial data, have demonstrated performance comparable to that of specialists in cancer detection and tumor segmentation [15,16,17,18,19,20].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
In the citing paper
“When a low-capacity model, such as AlexNet, is used for pre-training, little improvement can be obtained when compared to the Resnet50 family [26].”
From Self-supervised learning: A succinct review (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Since its introduction by Krizhevsky et al. [7] in 2012, the CNN model has been successfully applied to a wide range of multimodal applications, such as image dehazing [239, 240] and human activity recognition [241].”
From A survey on deep multimodal learning for computer vision: advances, trends, applications, and datasets (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“The AlexNet architecture was published in [4], achieved significantly improved performance over the other non-deep learning methods for ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2012.”
From Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: cnn architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Deep CNN architectures with 8, even 22 layers [4], [33], can be useful even for CADe problems where the available training datasets are limited.”
From Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: cnn architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“focusing on AI and deep learning architectures that have already become the de facto approach.”
From AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions (2020) · cites this paper as [101]
In the citing paper
“Since then, fueled by the revolutionary results of AlexNet [101] and incarnations of patch-based adaptations of Deep Boltzmann Machines and stacked autoencoders, deep learning based segmentation of anatomy and pathology has witnessed a revolution (see also Table II), where for some tasks now we observe human level performance [102].”
From AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions (2020) · cites this paper as [101]
In the citing paper
“ReLU significantly increases the rate of con-vergence of stochastic gradient descent in comparison with the sigmoid [26].”
From Real-time system for automatic cold strip surface defect detection (2019) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Real-time volume estimation has been achieved using fully convolutional neural networks (FCNNs) [11] to produce state-of-the-art performance in a range of medical imaging modalities [12].”
From Fully Automated 3-D Ultrasound Segmentation of the Placenta, Amniotic Fluid, and Fetus for Early Pregnancy Assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
“we found that removing any convolutional layer (each of which contains no more than 1% of the model's parameters) resulted in inferior performance.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.5. Overall architecture
“The third convolutional layer has 384 kernels of size 3 × 3 × 256”
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
Krizhevsky, A. (2024) · doi:10.57702/zp44cu3g · Cited by 23,889
Self-citationLearning Internal Representations by Error Propagation
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1985) · doi:10.21236/ada164453 · Cited by 16,501
Self-citation(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Self-citationImproving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382
Self-citationFukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759
LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation
Russell, B. C., Torralba, A., Murphy, K. P., & Freeman, W. T. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0090-8 · Cited by 4,210
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 · Cited by 4,196
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Berg A., 2010, Large scale visual recognition challenge
- Deng J., 2009, CVPR09
- Krizhevsky A., 2009, Department of Computer Science
- Krizhevsky A., 2010, Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10. Unpublished manuscript
- Krizhevsky A., 2011, ESANN
- LeCun Y., 1990, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- LeCun Y., 1985, Une procedure d'apprentissage pour reseau a seuil asymmetrique (a learning scheme for asymmetric threshold networks)
- 10.5555/1896300.1896315 · DOI
- Mensink T., 2012, Italy
- 10.5555/3104322.3104425 · DOI
- Rumelhart D.E., 1985, DTIC Document
- 10.5555/938980.939477 · DOI
- Werbos P., 1974, Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 104,701–104,800 of 108,435
On Using Artificial Neural Networks for Multipath Radio Channel Estimation
Karásek, R., & Gentner, C. (2025) · IEEE/ION Position Location and Navigation Symposium · doi:10.1109/plans61210.2025.11028436
Patel, D., Nitin, N., Cahay, M. M., & Shah, M. T. (2025) · IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability · doi:10.1109/sustech63138.2025.11025587
EDSDF: An Efficient Deep Supervised Distillation Framework for medical image segmentation
Chen, X., Li, Z., Tang, S., Li, J., Liu, H., & Nong, J. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130635 · Cited by 1
Liu, X., & Li, C. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6963-9_5
Xu, L., & Shi, W. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394285860.ch4
Dangol, A., Wolfe, R., Landesman, R., et al. (2025) · Computer-supported collaborative learning/The Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference · doi:10.22318/cscl2025.100835
ZFD-Net: Zinc flower defect detection model of galvanized steel surface based on improved YOLOV5
Gao, Y., Zhang, H., Zhu, L., et al. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0325507
Gender classification using dorsal NIR hand veins imaging
Badawi, A., Saber, A., Mohamed, B., et al. (2025) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-025-11363-7
Automatic Detection and Predictive Geo-location of Foreign Object Debris on Airport Runway
Sahithi, K., Ganesh, K., Kiran, M. U., et al. (2025) · INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT · doi:10.55041/ijsrem.ncft004
Grishkov, G. A., Nafigin, I. O., Ustinov, S. А., et al. (2024) · Izvestiya Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics · doi:10.1134/s0001433825700124
Advanced Interpretation of Bullet-Affected Chest X-Rays Using Deep Transfer Learning
Khan, S., Bhowmick, N., Farooq, A., et al. (2025) · AI · doi:10.3390/ai6060125
Shuai, 张. Z., & Meiju, 刘. L. (2025) · Laser & Optoelectronics Progress · doi:10.3788/lop242084
Data augmentation-assisted transfer learning for efficient monolayer recognition
Zhang, Z., Li, Q., Xue, J., Wu, Z. Y., Fan, L., Dai, Y., Wang, J., Gao, C., Liu, J., & Cheng, Y. (2025) · Applied Surface Science · doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2025.163798
Foster noisy label learning by exploiting noise-induced distortion in foreground localization
Chen, A., Xu, F., Lyu, X., Zeng, T., & Li, X. (2025) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2025.107712
“AgriVision” a Flutter -Based Application for RealTime Detection of Pesticides Residues on Fruits .”
P.Magar, S. (2025) · INTERANTIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT · doi:10.55041/ijsrem49819
LiteNet: A Lightweight Feature Fusion Model for Brain Tumor Classification
Nizamani, A. H., Nizamani, A. H., Chen, Z., et al. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6960-8_10
Sleep strengthens successor representations of learned sequencesPreprint
He, X., Büchel, P. K., Faghel-Soubeyrand, S., Klingspohr, J., Kehl, M. S., & Staresina, B. P. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.11.658893
Ninomiya, D., Aoki, K., Yoshitake, R., Teshigahara, K., Hiratani, N., Kubota, S., Fujii, K., Onoue, K., & Nakamura, S. (2025) · Renal Replacement Therapy · doi:10.1186/s41100-025-00637-4 · Cited by 1
“In recent years, the accuracy of image recognition using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) has improved, and CNNs have been applied to detect people and objects from camera images [8].”
Design of Vision Transformer for Range-Doppler Map-Based Radar Target Classification
Choi, B., Lee, S., Kim, J., et al. (2025) · The Journal of Korean Institute of Electromagnetic Engineering and Science · doi:10.5515/kjkiees.2025.36.5.457
Computing the Deep Semantics of Visual Communications
Ježić, T. J., Maričević, M., Pavlović, I., & Mikota, M. (2025) · Tehnički glasnik · doi:10.31803/tg-20240603185810
IoT-Enabled Edge Architecture for Real-Time Facial Emotion Recognition
Black, J. T., & Shakir, M. Z. (2025) · doi:10.1109/cismcompanion65074.2025.11032402
Bool Prompt with Decomposition and Enhancement: Zero-Shot VQA Based on PVLMs
Xu, L., Jiao, Y., & Bao, B. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · doi:10.1145/3744343
“Early approaches to VQA rely on Convolutional Neural Networks [21] to encode the visual information from images and Recurrent Neural Networks [54] to encode the linguistic content of the questions.”
Integrating AI and genomics: predictive CNN models for schizophrenia phenotypes
Henriques, G., Abbasi, M., Martins, D., & Arrais, J. P. (2025) · Berichte aus der medizinischen Informatik und Bioinformatik/Journal of integrative bioinformatics · doi:10.1515/jib-2024-0057
Zhang, Y., Guo, S., Tian, J., Wang, X., Ge, S., Hua, J., Deng, L., & Chen, Q. (2025) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000042764
“[33] We did not differentiate between different types of coronary artery lesions (e.g., single vessel lesion, multiple vessel lesion, left main coronary artery lesion) for this information is important for CHD severity and treatment decisions.”
Knowledge-Based Building Region Extraction Using Patch-Based Graph Cut
Futagami, T., & Hayasaka, N. (2025) · IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems · doi:10.1587/transinf.2025pcp0006
Global and Local Similarity Aggregation for Face Sketch Recognition
Zheng, J., Wang, X., Tang, Y. J., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2025.3577444
Learning-Based Detection of Intraday False Data Injection Attacks on DER Dispatch Signals
Wu, Y., Kim, J., Bhela, S., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2025.3579893
Arc Discharge in Connector Components and Its Application in Intermittent Fault Diagnosis
Cheng, X., Lv, K., Wang, L., et al. (2025) · International Conference on Energy, Electrical and Power Engineering (CEEPE) · doi:10.1109/ceepe64987.2025.11033734
Wen, Y., Zhou, J., Zhang, Z., & Tang, L. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14122479
Detection of Bird Species Found in Bhutan Using Vision Transformer-based Transfer Learning
Wangchuk, K., Wangchuk, T., & Dorji, T. (2025) · Zorig Melong. · doi:10.17102/zmv8.i1.008
Képeš, E. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-85975-5_4
Rewriting Style Features of a Pre-Trained GAN Based on a Single Image
Wang, H.-K., Way, D., & Shih, Z.-C. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC) · doi:10.1109/icsc64641.2025.00037
Chen, X., Qin, W., Qiao, L., & Li, J. (2026) · Cluster Computing · doi:10.1007/s10586-026-06342-z
Nieves, J., Serena-Barriuso, A., & Elejoste-Rementeria, G. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15136991
Xia, K., Zhou, B., Li, B., & Zhu, L. (2025) · International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics (ICCCBDA) · doi:10.1109/icccbda64898.2025.11030421
The Application of Generative Adversarial Network on Data Augmentation for Target Selection
Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Xu, Q., et al. (2025) · International Journal of Automotive Technology · doi:10.1007/s12239-025-00261-5
“However, these metrics are designed explicitly for images and rely on third-party resources, such as ImageNet (Krizhevsky et al., 2017) or inception network (Szegedy et al., 2017).”
Exploring Bengali handwriting as a tool for classifying children’s age groups
Ismail, S., Díaz, M., Aleman, B. E., & Ferrer, M. A. (2025) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-025-20977-x
Güler, R., Şentürk, Z. K., Gamsızkan, M., & Özcan, Y. (2025) · Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences · doi:10.35377/saucis...1582098
CNN-extracted features generate synthetic fMRI responses to unseen images
Delavari, P., Sigal, L., & Oruç, İ. (2025) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2025.108641
“For feature extraction, we employed the AlexNet model (Krizhevsky et al., 2017), which was pre-trained on the ImageNet dataset.”
HFINet: Heteroscale feature integration network for real-time semantic segmentation
Shi, J., Liu, J., Lu, W. S., Liu, R., & Wang, J. (2025) · Signal Processing Image Communication · doi:10.1016/j.image.2025.117375
Deep Surrogate Model to Predict the Effectiveness of Substrates for Absorbing CO2 from Air
Ghooshchi, N. G., Wang, W., & Rahman, A. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-8197-6_1
A Meaningful Perturbation Metric for Evaluating Explainability Methods
Cohen, D., Chefer, H., & Wolf, L. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-95918-9_22
Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Recruitment Process
ONWUNEME, U. P. (2025) · Journal of African Innovation and Advanced Studies · doi:10.70382/ajaias.v8i2.030
Deep learning inversion for Tipper response of Z-axis Tipper electromagnetic
Yu, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2025) · Journal of Applied Geophysics · doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2025.105794
IDENTIFICATION OF GLAUCOMA FROM FUNDUS IMAGES AND USING DEEP LEARNING TECHNIQUES
Singh, S., Srivastav, N., & Srivastav, A. (2025) · doi:10.71058/jodac.v9i6005
Detecting aquatic plant transmission on floatplanes using computer vision
Pragman, P., Witmer, F. D. W., & Schwoerer, T. (2025) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-025-03608-2
“AlexNet is a CNN architecture introduced by Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey Hinton (2012).”
Text-to-image person retrieval with implicit relation alignment and contrastive learning
Shui, X., Zhu, Z., Liu, Y., Pei, H., Li, K., & Zhang, H. (2025) · The Journal of Supercomputing · doi:10.1007/s11227-025-07568-1
“Initially, global alignment methods [4, 20–24] gained prominence in the field of image-text matching, aiming to capture global semantic relationships and consistency to establish comprehensive image-text correspondences, thereby improving matching accuracy.”
Generative AI for Automated Customer Service Management in Salesforce Service Cloud
Jakranpally, K. (2022) · International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) · doi:10.21275/ms2203083603
A Model of Multi-order Sampling Neighbor Aggregation for Traffic Flow Prediction
Guo, S., Li, H., Li, J., et al. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-8728-2_28
Evolutionary chemical learning in dimerization networksPreprint
Tkachenko, A. V., Mognetti, B. M., & Maslov, S. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.06.16.660005 · Cited by 3
“Traditional approaches rely on digital computation and optimization techniques, such as backpropagation and gradient descent, to train models like deep neural networks (DNNs) [1, 2].”
TNeXt: A convolutional neural network for remote harbor classification
Gürtürk, M., Doğan, Ş., & Tuncer, T. (2025) · Ain Shams Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asej.2025.103545
A Comparative Study of Digital Hardware Acceleration Techniques for AI Workloads
Wali, K. (2020) · International Journal of Innovative Research in Engineering & Multidisciplinary Physical Sciences · doi:10.37082/ijirmps.v8.i4.232594
Predicting structures of composite materials through temperature fields based on deep learning
Chen, H., Xie, D., Liu, Z., & Zhou, H. (2025) · Numerical Heat Transfer Part A Applications · doi:10.1080/10407782.2025.2520808
Extending Reference-Based Texture Transformers for Image Dehazing
Reyes-Saldaña, E., & Rivera, M. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96255-4_20 · Cited by 1
InceptMan: An InceptionNeXt-Based Architecture for End-to-End Mandible Reconstruction
Kamboonsri, N., Tantisereepatana, N., Achakulvisut, T., & Vateekul, P. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3582504
SulfideNet: Deep Learning for Detection and Quantification of Iron Sulfides in Drill Core Scans
Rasoolijaberi, M., Zeng, C., Manchuk, J. G., Legat, M., & Jackson-Gain, A. (2025) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/jstars.2025.3582520 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence Techniques for Analyzing the Psychological State of Patients
Seghier, H., Bouhadada, T., & Ziani, A. (2024) · International Conference of the African Federation of Operational Research Societies (AFROS) · doi:10.1109/afros62115.2024.11036906
Investigation on Learning Accuracy for Tongue Surface Extraction from Ultrasound Image
Mukai, N., Mori, K., & Takei, Y. (2024) · doi:10.1109/ceii65291.2024.00017
ADERec: Adaptive Data Augmentation Sequence Recommendation Based on Dual Network Architecture
Wang, Z., Jun, F., Gao, Q., et al. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6582-2_12
Pruning Neural Network Parameters Using Recurrent Neural Networks
kinugasa, K., & Yamauchi, K. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-6582-2_13
Kumari, N. (2024) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY · doi:10.34218/ijaret_15_06_007
Morphology-Guided 3D Skull Gender Identification with Point-BERT
Wang, B., Wang, S., Zhao, J., Liu, T., Wang, Z., Pan, Z., & Zhou, M. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-7033-8_20
Analysing Facial Dynamics - Navarasas in Kathakali Videos Using Deep Learning
Reshma, M. R., Kannan, B., P, J. R. V., & Shailesh, S. (2025) · International Conference on Trends in Engineering Systems and Technologies (ICTEST) · doi:10.1109/ictest64710.2025.11042795
Zaidi, A. H. (2025) · International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM) · doi:10.18535/ijsrm/v13i06.ec10
Quantification stochastic configuration networks with incremental encoding
Wang, W., Li, S., & Fu, W. (2025) · Journal of the Franklin Institute · doi:10.1016/j.jfranklin.2025.107817
Enhancing Citrus Disease Categorization with Deep Learning Optimization
Jyothi, T., Radhika, T., Soujanya, A., et al. (2025) · International Conference on Signal Processing, Computing and Control (ISPCC) · doi:10.1109/ispcc66872.2025.11039599
VLF/LF Lightning Signals Generation Based on CNN-Transformer Network
Li, H., Wang, J., Ma, Q., & Jiang, L. (2025) · International Conference on Information Science, Electrical and Automation Engineering (ISEAE) · doi:10.1109/iseae64934.2025.11042020 · Cited by 1
Enhancing Neural Network Interpretability Through Deep Prior-Guided Expected Gradients
Guo, S.-Y., & Gong, X. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15137090
EnvMat: A Network for Simultaneous Generation of PBR Maps and Environment Maps from a Single Image
Oh, S. W., Jung, M.-R., & Kim, T. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14132554
“Particularly, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) [1] and GAN-based models [2] have been explored to transform low-resolution textures or images into high-resolution outputs.”
A review of current technologies for detecting and deterring harmful birds in horticultural crops
Pruteanu, A. M., Matache, M., Carstea, D. A., & CRISTEA, R. D. (2025) · Acta Horticulturae · doi:10.17660/actahortic.2025.1433.34
A Study on Data Science in Computer Vision Trends and Future Emerging Technologies
Riyaz Mohammed, M. (2020) · International Journal of Emerging Research in Engineering and Technology · doi:10.63282/3050-922x.ijeret-v1i4p101
Advancing Capsule Networks: Addressing CNN Limitations for Hierarchical Feature Learning
John, S. (2020) · International Journal of Emerging Trends in Computer Science and Information Technology · doi:10.63282/3050-9246.ijetcsit-v1i3p101
Martinez, J. (2023) · International Journal of AI BigData Computational and Management Studies · doi:10.63282/3050-9416.ijaibdcms-v4i3p101
Tütüncüler, T., & Hoplamaz, B. (2025) · Modular Journal · doi:10.59389/modular.1550067
Improving Cell Nuclei Segmentation in Pathological Tissues Using Self-Supervised Regression Method
Ali, H., Hammouda, M. A., Elattar, M., & Selim, S. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3583069
Transformer-based Image Classification Model with Multi-scale Dynamic Window
Zheng, Z. (2025) · International Conference on Digital Image Processing and Computer Applications (DIPCA) · doi:10.1109/dipca65051.2025.11042404
Unsupervised representation learning for wafer defect recognition
Geng, S., Wang, F., & Liu, H. (2025) · Robotic Intelligence and Automation · doi:10.1108/ria-04-2023-0043
Kong, X., Han, K., Liu, T., Maity, A., Li, A., Jin, X., & Yu, J. (2025) · Weed Science · doi:10.1017/wsc.2025.10021 · Cited by 2
Schema Matching Using Federated Learning on a Hybrid Feature Set
Shepelev, A. E., & Stupnikov, S. A. (2025) · Pattern Recognition and Image Analysis · doi:10.1134/s1054661825700142
Jamalidinan, H. S., Fathy, M., & Akbari, A. (2000) · Time to knit · doi:10.51847/qfim4xjapy
waran, V. (2020) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Data Science and Machine Learning · doi:10.63282/3050-9262.ijaidsml-v1i1p101
Wu, J., Tanim, S., Woo, M., Ahammed, T., & Rennert, L. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.06.24.25330211
“By encountering a wider range of data characteristics (county, date range, historical depth), the model is better equipped to handle the complexities of real-world data [29].”
Multi-Dimensional Search Structures for Deep Learning Architectures
Liu, C. (2024) · International Journal of AI BigData Computational and Management Studies · doi:10.63282/3050-9416.ijaibdcms-v5i1p102
Transfer Learning Based Damage Detection in Public Areas
Keleş, T., Temur, S., Kılınç, F., et al. (2025) · Firat University Journal of Experimental and Computational Engineering · doi:10.62520/fujece.1583372
Convolutional and Recurrent Neural Network
Arif, T. M. (2025) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394269297.ch03
An Enhanced Siamese Network-Based Visual Tracking Algorithm with a Dual Attention Mechanism
Cai, X., Feng, S., Masood, V., et al. (2025) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics14132579
Method for assessing rodent infestation in plateau based on SegFormer
Huang, X., Zhang, G., Li, C., et al. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0325738
“For example, Gomez et al. [11] utilized four deep convolutional neural networks— AlexNet [12], VGGNet [13], GoogLeNet [14], and ResNet [15]—to process and recognize wildlife images captured by cameras.”
Underwater Sounds Classification for Effective Smart Marine Monitoring Systems
Nappi, M., Narducci, F., & Simone, B. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3583359
Turini, J., & Võ, M. L. ‐. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/c2pxv_v1
DEEP LEARNING: EVOLUTION, INNOVATIONS, AND APPLICATIONS IN THE LAST DECADE
Günay, M., Yıldırım, Ö., & Demir, Y. (2025) · Middle East Journal of Science · doi:10.51477/mejs.1640908 · Cited by 2
One-Shot Face Classification Using Siamese Neural Networks
Balamurali, S., Mittal, P., & Sharma, S. (2025) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-1687-9_47
Vazinram, F. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-96962-1_6
Individuality transfer: Predicting human decision-making across tasksPreprint
Higashi, H. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.107163.1
Fırıldak, K., Çelik, G., & Talu, M. F. (2025) · Türk doğa ve fen dergisi :/Türk doğa ve fen dergisi · doi:10.46810/tdfd.1661900
Training and Upskilling Employees for Generative AI-Powered Industry 4.0 Supply Chains
Kacha, S. B., Chheladiya, M., Joshi, M., & Bhindi, J. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9856-2.ch005
DeepImageSegmentationApp: Deep Learning Application for Image Segmentation
Bayrak, L., Koçkaya, K., & Çınar, A. (2025) · Ordu Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi · doi:10.54370/ordubtd.1651665
Rizwan, T., Cai, Y., & Vohra, R. (2025) · Machine Vision and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00138-025-01703-x
“Architectures like AlexNet Krizhevsky et al. [23], VGG Simonyan and Zisserman [32], and ResNet He et al. [14] have served as foundational components, enabling signifi - cant progress in 2D single-person and multi-person pose estimation.”
Interlaced 6T-10T CMOS in-memory computing circuit for low silicon area pipelined DNNs
Doménech‐Asensi, G., Andreo-Oliver, F. J., Ruı́z, R., & Díaz‐Madrid, J. Á. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems proceedings · doi:10.1109/iscas56072.2025.11043424
Metadata
- Authors
- Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2017-05-24
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 84-90
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2163605009
- Cited by
- 112,155
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2710 · 2025: 7710 · 2024: 10211 · 2023: 12267 · 2022: 12280 · 2021: 15497 · 2020: 14538 · 2019: 13976 · 2018: 9999 · 2017: 6661
- FWCI
- 5127.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- ImageNet, image classification, deep convolutional neural networks, dropout regularization, overfitting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
