The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 14 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Open accessAbstract
We trained a large, deep convolutional neural network to classify the 1.2 million high-resolution images in the ImageNet LSVRC-2010 contest into the 1000 different classes. On the test data, we achieved top-1 and top-5 error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively, which is considerably better than the previous state-of-the-art. The neural network, which has 60 million parameters and 650,000 neurons, consists of five convolutional layers, some of which are followed by max-pooling layers, and three fully connected layers with a final 1000-way softmax. To make training faster, we used non-saturating neurons and a very efficient GPU implementation of the convolution operation. To reduce overfitting in the fully connected layers we employed a recently developed regularization method called "dropout" that proved to be very effective. We also entered a variant of this model in the ILSVRC-2012 competition and achieved a winning top-5 test error rate of 15.3%, compared to 26.2% achieved by the second-best entry.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
42 Own result · 21 Own interpretation · 7 No basis given · 4 No full text of the sources · 3 Sources not found · 2 Supported · 2 Not checked yet · 1 Own method
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This technique reduces complex co adaptations of neurons, since a neuron cannot rely on the presence of particular other neurons.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012). source
The paper states on p. 1 that dropout prevents complex co-adaptations by randomly omitting hidden units, so a hidden unit cannot rely on other hidden units being present. This directly supports the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“There is, however, a very efficient version of model combination that only costs about a factor of two during training.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012). source
The paper describes dropout as an efficient way to combine many neural-network models (p. 1). In F.6 Training (p. 17), it reports that ImageNet training took roughly four days with dropout versus two days without it, supporting the approximate factor-of-two training cost. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scheme reduces our top-1 and top-5 error rates by 1.7% and 1.2%, respectively, as compared with a net with half as many kernels in each convolutional layer trained on one GPU.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.2. Training on multiple GPUs
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The size of our network made overfitting a significant problem, even with 1.2 million labeled training examples”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So these data augmentation schemes are, in effect, computationally free.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 18
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Create a free account to see these claims.
Create a free account to see these assumptions.
34 more claims
Create a free account to see all 82 claims and to verify the 3 references still open.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the field of DL, the CNN is the most famous and commonly employed algorithm [30, 71–75].”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), built for spatial data, have demonstrated performance comparable to that of specialists in cancer detection and tumor segmentation [15,16,17,18,19,20].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Deep CNN architectures with 8, even 22 layers [4], [33], can be useful even for CADe problems where the available training datasets are limited.”
From Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: cnn architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Fully convolutional neural networks (fCNNs) have provided state-of-the-art performance for object classification and image segmentation (1).”
From Fully automated, real-time 3D ultrasound segmentation to estimate first trimester placental volume using deep learning (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The first wave saw the emergence of deep learning as the dominant paradigm for analyzing high-dimensional biological data.”
From The next paradigm in bioinformatics: a review of multi-agent systems and foundational models for end-to-end scientific discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
19 more claims about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
“we found that removing any convolutional layer (each of which contains no more than 1% of the model's parameters) resulted in inferior performance.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.5. Overall architecture
“The third convolutional layer has 384 kernels of size 3 × 3 × 256”
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
Krizhevsky, A. (2024) · doi:10.57702/zp44cu3g · Cited by 23,884
Self-citationLearning Internal Representations by Error Propagation
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1985) · doi:10.21236/ada164453 · Cited by 16,501
Self-citation(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Self-citationImproving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382
Self-citationFukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759
LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation
Russell, B. C., Torralba, A., Murphy, K. P., & Freeman, W. T. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0090-8 · Cited by 4,210
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 · Cited by 4,196
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Berg A., 2010, Large scale visual recognition challenge
- Deng J., 2009, CVPR09
- Krizhevsky A., 2009, Department of Computer Science
- Krizhevsky A., 2010, Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10. Unpublished manuscript
- Krizhevsky A., 2011, ESANN
- LeCun Y., 1990, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- LeCun Y., 1985, Une procedure d'apprentissage pour reseau a seuil asymmetrique (a learning scheme for asymmetric threshold networks)
- 10.5555/1896300.1896315 · DOI
- Mensink T., 2012, Italy
- 10.5555/3104322.3104425 · DOI
- Rumelhart D.E., 1985, DTIC Document
- 10.5555/938980.939477 · DOI
- Werbos P., 1974, Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences
Cited by
Items 39,401–39,500 of 108,437
Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., Ni, P., Cao, Q., & Hu, J. (2024) · Nondestructive Testing And Evaluation · doi:10.1080/10589759.2024.2406448 · Cited by 18
Huang, H. (2024) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems12100416 · Cited by 29
KAYA, Y. Ç. (2024) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics14192253 · Cited by 21
Banyong, C., Hantanong, N., Wisutwattanasak, P., Champahom, T., Theerathitichaipa, K., Seefong, M., Ratanavaraha, V., & Jomnonkwao, S. (2024) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103110 · Cited by 23
GA-SmaAt-GNet: Generative adversarial small attention GNet for extreme precipitation nowcasting
Reulen, E., Shi, J., & Mehrkanoon, S. (2024) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2024.112612 · Cited by 25
Zhang, Q., Ahmed, K. E. U., Sharda, N. K., & Wang, H. (2024) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1155/2024/7033535 · Cited by 24
Iaboni, C., & Abichandani, P. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3479968 · Cited by 23
Zhang, M., Tang, E., Ding, H., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2024_jslhr-24-00157 · Cited by 22
Dual-stream fusion network with multi-head self-attention for multi-modal fake news detection
Yang, Y., Liu, J., Yang, Y., & Cen, L. (2024) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112358 · Cited by 26
Hu, S., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Cui, Z., Yang, C., Yao, Z., & Ge, J. (2024) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106836 · Cited by 18
EarthNets: Empowering artificial intelligence for Earth observation
Xiong, Z., Zhang, F., Wang, Y., Shi, Y., & Zhu, X. X. (2024) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2024.3466998 · Cited by 112
“To deal with large-scale data, deep learning techniques [9] have been proven effective for different research areas.”
Tao, W., Lin, X., Liu, Y., Li, Z., Ma, T., Cheng, N., Jiang, J., Zeng, X., & Yuan, S. (2024) · BMC Biology · doi:10.1186/s12915-024-02049-y · Cited by 17
Yu, C.-M., & Lin, Y. (2024) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109565 · Cited by 18
Almutairi, S., & Barnawi, A. (2024) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103295 · Cited by 21
Alipour, P., Gallegos, E. E., & Sridhar, S. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2432455 · Cited by 25
Ravichandran, N. B., Lansner, A., & Herman, P. A. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.129440 · Cited by 22
Xue, M., Liu, B., Cao, S., & Huang, X. (2025) · npj Drug Discovery. · doi:10.1038/s44386-025-00005-6 · Cited by 24
Deep learning-based system for automated damage detection and quantification in concrete pavement
Garita‐Durán, H., Stöcker, J. P., & Kaliske, M. (2025) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104546 · Cited by 20
Introduction to Machine Learning and Optimization in Healthcare
Gauthaman, S. A., Muniasamy, A., Kamaldheen, R., Kumar, S. S., Murugesan, K., Viswanathan, M. K., & Devendran, H. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-1087-9.ch001 · Cited by 19
Learning Convolutional Nonlinear Features for K Nearest Neighbor Image Classification
Ren, W., Yu, Y., Zhang, J., & Huang, K. (2014) · Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr.2014.746 · Cited by 18
Han, S., Nandakumar, R., Philipose, M., Krishnamurthy, A., & Wetherall, D. J. (2014) · doi:10.1145/2611264.2611269 · Cited by 18
A Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic Analysis of Aerial Imagery
Maire, F., Mejías, L., & Hodgson, A. J. (2014) · International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA) · doi:10.1109/dicta.2014.7008084 · Cited by 21
Vehicle detection and classification based on convolutional neural network
He, D., Lang, C., Feng, S., Du, X., & Zhang, C. G. (2015) · International Conference on Internet Multimedia Computing and Service · doi:10.1145/2808492.2808495 · Cited by 18
Sparse Quantization for Patch Description
Boix, X., Gygli, M., Roig, G., & Gool, L. V. (2013) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2013.366 · Cited by 18
Scalable Nonlinear Embeddings for Semantic Category-Based Image Retrieval
Sharma, G., & Schiele, B. (2015) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.153 · Cited by 19
Visual descriptors for scene categorization: experimental evaluation
Wei, X., Phung, S. L., & Bouzerdoum, A. (2015) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-015-9448-4 · Cited by 20
Multiclass classification based on a deep convolutional network for head pose estimation
Cai, Y., Yang, M., & Li, J. (2015) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.1500125 · Cited by 18
Interweaving deep learning and semantic techniques for emotion analysis in human-machine interaction
Kollias, D., Marandianos, G., Raouzaiou, A. T., & Stafylopatis, A. (2015) · International Workshop on Semantic and Social Media Adaptation and Personalization (SMAP) · doi:10.1109/smap.2015.7370086 · Cited by 18
BubbLeNet: Foveated Imaging for Visual Discovery
Matzen, K., & Snavely, N. (2015) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.224 · Cited by 18
Are Face and Object Recognition Independent? A Neurocomputational Modeling Exploration
Wang, P., Gauthier, L., & Cottrell, G. W. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00919 · Cited by 18
An efficient and sparse approach for large scale human action recognition in videos
Beaudry, C., Péteri, R., & Mascarilla, L. (2016) · Machine Vision and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00138-016-0760-z · Cited by 18
Object recognition in art drawings: Transfer of a neural network
Yin, R., Monson, E. E., Honig, E. A., Daubechies, I. C., & Maggioni, M. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2016.7472087 · Cited by 18
Multi-scale score level fusion of local descriptors for gender classification in the wild
Castrillón-Santana, M., Lorenzo-Navarro, J., & Ramón-Balmaseda, E. (2016) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-016-3653-2 · Cited by 18
Picture it in your mind: generating high level visual representations from textual descriptions
Carrara, F., Esuli, A., Fagni, T., Falchi, F., & Moreo, A. (2017) · Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/s10791-017-9318-6 · Cited by 31
Large-Scale Active Learning with Approximations of Expected Model Output Changes
Käding, C., Freytag, A., Rodner, E., et al. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-45886-1_15 · Cited by 18
DBN based automatic modulation recognition for ultra-low SNR RFID signals
Ma, L., Yang, Y., & Wang, H. (2016) · Chinese Control Conference (CCC) · doi:10.1109/chicc.2016.7554471 · Cited by 18
Deep Learning Based Fence Segmentation and Removal from an Image Using a Video Sequence
Jonna, S., Nakka, K. K., & Sahay, R. R. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-49409-8_68 · Cited by 17
Exploiting Objects with LSTMs for Video Categorization
Sun, Y., Wu, Z., Wang, X., Arai, H., Kinebuchi, T., & Jiang, Y. (2016) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/2964284.2967199 · Cited by 17
Motion background modeling based on context-encoder
Qu, Z., Yu, S., & Fu, M. (2016) · doi:10.1109/icaipr.2016.7585207 · Cited by 18
Two-level hierarchical feature learning for image classification
Song, G., Jin, X., Chen, G.-L., & Nie, Y. (2016) · Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering · doi:10.1631/fitee.1500346 · Cited by 18
Emotion in Robots Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Ghayoumi, M., & Bansal, A. K. (2016) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47437-3_28 · Cited by 18
Gaussian Mixture Model and Deep Neural Network based Vehicle Detection and Classification
Sri, S., & R., K. (2016) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2016.070903 · Cited by 19
Deep learning for superpixel-based classification of remote sensing images
Gonzalo‐Martín, C., García‐Pedrero, Á., Lillo‐Saavedra, M., & Menasalvas, E. (2016) · International Conference on Geographic Object-Based Image Analysis (GEOBIA) · doi:10.3990/2.401 · Cited by 19
Face recognition from near-infrared images with convolutional neural network
Zhang, X., Peng, M., & Chen, T. (2016) · International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP) · doi:10.1109/wcsp.2016.7752592 · Cited by 18
Depth estimation from single monocular images using deep hybrid network
Grigorev, A., Jiang, F., Rho, S., Jifara, W., Liu, S., & Sai, S. (2016) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-016-4200-x · Cited by 19
Discovering Class-Specific Spatial Layouts for Scene Recognition
Weng, C., Wang, H., Yuan, J., & Jiang, X. (2016) · IEEE Signal Processing Letters · doi:10.1109/lsp.2016.2641020 · Cited by 18
How popular CNNs perform in real applications of face recognition
Ahmadvand, P., Ebrahimpour, R., & Ahmadvand, P. (2016) · Telecommunications Forum (TELFOR) · doi:10.1109/telfor.2016.7818876 · Cited by 19
Suleiman, A., Zhang, Z., & Sze, V. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2017.2648820 · Cited by 18
Multi-organ plant identification with multi-column deep convolutional neural networks
He, A., & Tian, X. (2016) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc.2016.7844537 · Cited by 19
Anomaly detection techniques in surveillance videos
Li, X., & Cai, Z. (2016) · International Congress on Image and Signal Processing, BioMedical Engineering and Informatics (CISP-BMEI) · doi:10.1109/cisp-bmei.2016.7852681 · Cited by 18
Fine-Tuning Based Deep Convolutional Networks for Lepidopterous Genus Recognition
Carvajal, J., Romero, D. G., & Sappa, A. D. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-52277-7_57 · Cited by 21
Large-scale supervised learning of the grasp robustness of surface patch pairs
Seita, D., Pokorny, F. T., Mahler, J., Kragić, D., Franklin, M. J. M., Canny, J., & Goldberg, K. Y. (2016) · IEEE International Conference on Simulation, Modeling, and Programming for Autonomous Robots (SIMPAR) · doi:10.1109/simpar.2016.7862399 · Cited by 19
Using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks to Predict Goal-scoring Opportunities in Soccer
Wagenaar, M., Okafor, E., Frencken, W. G. P., & Wiering, M. (2017) · International Conference on Pattern Recognition Applications and Methods · doi:10.5220/0006194804480455 · Cited by 19
Building a Regular Decision Boundary with Deep Networks
Oyallon, E. (2017) · IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.204 · Cited by 24
A Shallow Network with Combined Pooling for Fast Traffic Sign Recognition
Zhang, J., Huang, Q., Wu, H., et al. (2017) · Information · doi:10.3390/info8020045 · Cited by 18
Human‐action recognition using a multi‐layered fusion scheme of Kinect modalities
Seddik, B., Gazzah, S., & Amara, N. E. B. (2017) · IET Computer Vision · doi:10.1049/iet-cvi.2016.0326 · Cited by 17
Apply Deep Learning Neural Network to Forecast Number of Tourists
Chang, Y., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2017) · International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA) · doi:10.1109/waina.2017.125 · Cited by 18
Visually Browsing Millions of Images Using Image Graphs
Barthel, K. U., Hezel, N., & Jung, K. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval (ICMR) · doi:10.1145/3078971.3079016 · Cited by 18
FF-CNN: An Efficient Deep Neural Network for Mitosis Detection in Breast Cancer Histological Images
Wu, B., Kausar, T., Xiao, Q., Wang, M., Wang, W., Fan, B., & Sun, D. (2017) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60964-5_22 · Cited by 20
Segmentation of precursor lesions in cervical cancer using convolutional neural networks
Albayrak, A., Akhan, A. Ü., Çalık, N., Bilgin, G., Türkmen, İ., Çakır, A., Çapar, A., Töreyın, B. U., & Durak-Ata, L. (2017) · Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU) · doi:10.1109/siu.2017.7960459 · Cited by 18
Convolutional neural networks (CNN) for indoor human activity recognition using Ubisense system
Li, J., Wu, R., Zhao, J., et al. (2017) · Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) · doi:10.1109/ccdc.2017.7978857 · Cited by 18
Comparison of semantic segmentation approaches for horizon/sky line detection
Ahmad, T., Campr, P., Čadík, M., et al. (2017) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2017.7966418 · Cited by 18
Copula Ordinal Regression Framework for Joint Estimation of Facial Action Unit Intensity
Walecki, R., Rudovic, O. O., Pavlović, V., & Pantić, M. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2017.2728534 · Cited by 18
Face Recognition with Convolutional Neural Networks and subspace learning
Wan, L., Na, L., Huo, H., et al. (2017) · International Conference on Image, Vision and Computing (ICIVC) · doi:10.1109/icivc.2017.7984551 · Cited by 18
Spatiotemporal representation of driving scenarios and classification using neural networks
Gruner, R., Henzler, P., Hinz, G., Eckstein, C., & Knoll, A. (2017) · IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium · doi:10.1109/ivs.2017.7995965 · Cited by 19
Wheeze Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks
Kochetov, K., Lane, E., Azizov, S., Skorobogatov, I., & Filchenkov, A. A. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-65340-2_14 · Cited by 21
A deep spiking machine-hearing system for the case of invasive fish species
Demertzis, K., Iliadis, L., & Anezakis, V.-D. (2017) · doi:10.1109/inista.2017.8001126 · Cited by 18
HGO-CNN: Hybrid generic-organ convolutional neural network for multi-organ plant classification
Lee, S. H., Chang, Y. L., Chan, C. S., & Remagnino, P. (2017) · Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.2017.8297126 · Cited by 19
Ensemble-of-Concept Models for Unsupervised Formation of Multiple Categories
Nakamura, T., & Nagai, T. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2017.2745502 · Cited by 16
Robust shared feature learning for script and handwritten/machine-printed identification
Feng, Z., Yang, Z., Jin, L., Huang, S., & Sun, J. (2017) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2017.09.016 · Cited by 18
A Deep Learning Approach for Valve Defect Recognition in Heart Acoustic Signal
Kucharski, D., Grochala, D., Kajor, M., et al. (2017) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67220-5_1 · Cited by 18
Learning Spatio-Temporal Aggregation for Fetal Heart Analysis in Ultrasound Video
Patra, A., Huang, W., & Noble, J. A. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67558-9_32 · Cited by 19
Boufenar, C., & Batouche, M. (2017) · International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV) · doi:10.1109/isacv.2017.8054902 · Cited by 19
Learning more distinctive representation by enhanced PCA network
Liu, Y., Zhao, S., Wang, Q., & Gao, Q. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.041 · Cited by 18
Hybrid Indexes for Spatial-Visual Search
Alfarrarjeh, A., Shahabi, C., & Kim, S. H. (2017) · doi:10.1145/3126686.3126763 · Cited by 18
Training Deep Neural Networks for Detecting Drinking Glasses Using Synthetic Images
Jabbar, A., Farrawell, L., Fountain, J., et al. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-70096-0_37 · Cited by 18
Two-stream Attentive CNNs for Image Retrieval
Yang, F., Li, J., Wei, S., et al. (2017) · ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) · doi:10.1145/3123266.3123396 · Cited by 18
A Convolutional Neural Network for Gait Recognition Based on Plantar Pressure Images
Li, Y., Zhang, D., Zhang, J., et al. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69923-3_50 · Cited by 18
Hazardous gas detection for FTIR-based hyperspectral imaging system using DNN and CNN
Kim, Y. C., Yu, H., Lee, J.-H., et al. (2017) · doi:10.1117/12.2279077 · Cited by 18
Procedural level generation using multi-layer level representations with MdMCs
Snodgrass, S., & Ontañón, S. (2017) · IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG) · doi:10.1109/cig.2017.8080447 · Cited by 16
A survey of evolution of image captioning techniques
Kumar, A., & Goel, S. (2017) · International Journal of Hybrid Intelligent Systems · doi:10.3233/his-170246 · Cited by 20
Semantic Segmentation of RGBD Videos with Recurrent Fully Convolutional Neural Networks
Yurdakul, E. E., & Yemez, Y. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops · doi:10.1109/iccvw.2017.51 · Cited by 16
Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Spectral-Spatial LSTMs
Zhou, F., Hang, R., Liu, Q., & Yuan, X. (2017) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-7299-4_48 · Cited by 18
Classification with Costly Features Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Janisch, J., Pevný, T., & Lisý, V. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33013959 · Cited by 18
Complementary Color Wavelet: A Novel Tool for the Color Image/Video Analysis and Processing
Chen, Y., Li, D., & Zhang, J. Q. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2017.2776239 · Cited by 18
Looking forward: A semantic mapping system for scouting with micro-aerial vehicles
Maturana, D., Arora, S., & Scherer, S. (2017) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2017.8206585 · Cited by 17
Multi-task learning for smile detection, emotion recognition and gender classification
Sang, D. V., Cuong, L. T. B., & Thieu, V. V. (2017) · International Symposium on Information and Communication Technology · doi:10.1145/3155133.3155207 · Cited by 18
Touil, D. E., Terki, N., & Medouakh, S. (2017) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-017-1120-z · Cited by 18
Learning Neural Audio Embeddings for Grounding Semantics in Auditory Perception
Kiela, D., & Clark, S. C. (2017) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.5665 · Cited by 18
Convolutional DLSTM for Crowd Scene Understanding
Zhuang, N., Ye, J., & Hua, K. A. (2017) · IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM) · doi:10.1109/ism.2017.19 · Cited by 19
Satellite super-resolution images depending on deep learning methods: A comparative study
Keshk, H. M., & Yin, X.-C. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on Signal Processing, Communications and Computing (ICSPCC) · doi:10.1109/icspcc.2017.8242625 · Cited by 18
Balaneshin-kordan, S., & Kotov, A. (2018) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3159652.3159735 · Cited by 19
The challenge of simultaneous object detection and pose estimation: A comparative study
Oñoro-Rubio, D., López-Sastre, R. J., Redondo-Cabrera, C., & Gil-Jiménez, P. (2018) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2018.09.013 · Cited by 18
Towards Scalable Deep Learning via I/O Analysis and Optimization
Pumma, S., Si, M., Feng, W.-C., & Balaji, P. (2017) · IEEE International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications; IEEE International Conference on Smart City; IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Systems (HPCC/SmartCity/DSS) · doi:10.1109/hpcc-smartcity-dss.2017.29 · Cited by 17
Retracted: Moving vehicle detection using deep neural network
Soin, A., & Chahande, M. (2017) · International Conference on Emerging Trends in Computing and Communication Technologies (ICETCCT) · doi:10.1109/icetcct.2017.8280336 · Cited by 18
RetractedGeographical Feature Extraction for Entities in Location-based Social Networks
Ding, D., Zhang, M., Pan, X., et al. (2018) · doi:10.1145/3178876.3186131 · Cited by 18
Handwritten digit recognition system on an FPGA
Si, J., & Harris, S. L. (2018) · IEEE Annual Computing and Communication Workshop and Conference (CCWC) · doi:10.1109/ccwc.2018.8301757 · Cited by 18
Bardinas, J. P., Aldrich, C., & Napier, L. F. A. (2018) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr6020017 · Cited by 17
Deep-learning-based face detection using iterative bounding-box regression
Luo, D., Wen, G., Li, D., et al. (2018) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-018-5658-5 · Cited by 18
Object detection via deeply exploiting depth information
Hou, S., Wang, Z., & Wu, F. (2018) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.01.055 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2017-05-24
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 84-90
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2163605009
- Cited by
- 112,155
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2710 · 2025: 7710 · 2024: 10211 · 2023: 12267 · 2022: 12280 · 2021: 15497 · 2020: 14538 · 2019: 13976 · 2018: 9999 · 2017: 6661
- FWCI
- 5127.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- ImageNet, image classification, deep convolutional neural networks, dropout regularization, overfitting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
