The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 2 of the 14 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Open accessAbstract
We trained a large, deep convolutional neural network to classify the 1.2 million high-resolution images in the ImageNet LSVRC-2010 contest into the 1000 different classes. On the test data, we achieved top-1 and top-5 error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively, which is considerably better than the previous state-of-the-art. The neural network, which has 60 million parameters and 650,000 neurons, consists of five convolutional layers, some of which are followed by max-pooling layers, and three fully connected layers with a final 1000-way softmax. To make training faster, we used non-saturating neurons and a very efficient GPU implementation of the convolution operation. To reduce overfitting in the fully connected layers we employed a recently developed regularization method called "dropout" that proved to be very effective. We also entered a variant of this model in the ILSVRC-2012 competition and achieved a winning top-5 test error rate of 15.3%, compared to 26.2% achieved by the second-best entry.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
42 Own result · 21 Own interpretation · 7 No basis given · 4 No full text of the sources · 3 Sources not found · 2 Supported · 2 Not checked yet · 1 Own method
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“This technique reduces complex co adaptations of neurons, since a neuron cannot rely on the presence of particular other neurons.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012). source
The paper states on p. 1 that dropout prevents complex co-adaptations by randomly omitting hidden units, so a hidden unit cannot rely on other hidden units being present. This directly supports the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.95)
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“There is, however, a very efficient version of model combination that only costs about a factor of two during training.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [12] 12. Hinton, G., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Salakhutdinov, R. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.0580 (2012). source
The paper describes dropout as an efficient way to combine many neural-network models (p. 1). In F.6 Training (p. 17), it reports that ImageNet training took roughly four days with dropout versus two days without it, supporting the approximate factor-of-two training cost. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scheme reduces our top-1 and top-5 error rates by 1.7% and 1.2%, respectively, as compared with a net with half as many kernels in each convolutional layer trained on one GPU.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.2. Training on multiple GPUs
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The size of our network made overfitting a significant problem, even with 1.2 million labeled training examples”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“So these data augmentation schemes are, in effect, computationally free.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we found that removing any convolutional layer (each of which contains no more than 1% of the model's parameters) resulted in inferior performance.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This scheme reduces the top-1 and top-5 error rates by 0.4% and 0.3%, respectively, as compared with the non overlapping scheme s = 2, z = 2, which produces output of equivalent dimensions.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This increases the size of our training set by a factor of 2048”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Deep CNNs with ReLUs train several times faster than their equivalents with tanh units.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.1. Rectified Linear Unit nonlinearity
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, we still find that the following local normalization scheme aids generalization.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 18
- Probably not a substantial claim. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the 1000 classes of ILSVRC make each training example impose 10 bits of constraint on the mapping from image to label, this turns out to be insufficient to learn so many parameters without considerable overfitting.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5. REDUCING OVERFITTING
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“though the resulting training examples are, of course, highly inter dependent.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plainstates an association- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the test data, we achieved top-1 and top-5 error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We generally observe during training that models with overlapping pooling find it slightly more difficult to overfit.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
plainstates a possible cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a four-layer CNN achieved a 13% test e r r o r r a t e w i t h o u t n o r m a l i z a t i o n a n d 1 1 % w i t h normalization.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“so we used several effective techniques for preventing overfitting”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Response normalization reduces our top-1 and top-5 error rates by 1.4% and 1.2%, respectively.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two-GPU net takes slightly less time to train than the one-GPU net.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.2. Training on multiple GPUs
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our network contains a number of new and unusual features which improve its performance and reduce its training time”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Without this scheme, our network suffers from substantial overfitting, which would have forced us to use much smaller networks.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.1. Data augmentation
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, only other types of cat are considered plausible labels for the leopard.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This initialization accelerates the early stages of learning by providing the ReLUs with positive inputs.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 6. DETAILS OF LEARNING
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper states — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notice that at the pixel level, the retrieved training images are generally not close in L2 to the query images in the first column.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Training one CNN, with an extra sixth convolutional layer over the last pooling layer, to classify the entire ImageNet Fall 2011 release (15M images, 22K categories), and then”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our top-1 and top-5 error rates on this dataset are 67.4% and 40.9%, attained by the net described above but with an additional, sixth convolutional layer over the last pooling layer.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The Fall 2009 ImageNet split used by the authors, which differs from previous authors' splits, does not affect the results appreciably.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This kind of specialization occurs during every run and is independent of any particular random weight initialization (modulo a renumbering of the GPUs).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The magnitude of the effect demonstrated here varies with network architecture, but networks with ReLUs consistently learn several times faster than equivalents with saturating neurons.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 9. EPILOGUE
boostedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our network achieves top-1 and top-5 test set error rates of 37.5% and 17.0%, respectively.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 7. RESULTS
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Averaging the predictions of five similar CNNs gives an error rate of 16.4%.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the remainder of this paragraph, we use validation and test error rates interchangeably because in our experience they do not differ by more than 0.1% (see Table 2).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Notice that even off-center objects, such as the mite in the top-left, can be recognized by the net.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All of our experiments suggest that our results can be improved simply by waiting for faster GPUs and bigger datasets to become available.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“ReLUs have the desirable property that they do not require input normalization to prevent them from saturating.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) constitute one such class of models.9,15,17,19,21,26,32”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [9] 9. Fukushima, K. Neocognitron: A self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biol. Cybern. 36, 4 (1980), 193-202. source
- Not checked yetcites [15] 15. Krizhevsky, A. Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10. Unpublished manuscript, 2010.
- Not checked yetcites [17] 17. LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J., Henderson, D., Howard, R., Hubbard, W., Jackel, L., et al. Handwritten digit recognition with a back-propagation network. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (1990).
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the immense complexity of the object recognition task means that this problem cannot be specified even by a dataset as large as ImageNet, so our model should also have lots of prior knowledge to compensate for all the data we do not have.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A statement the paper makes itself — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thus, compared to standard feedforward neural networks with similarly sized layers, CNNs have much fewer connections and parameters and so they are easier to train, while their theoretically best performance is likely to be only slightly worse.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“methods that require careful hand-engineering by a programmer who understands the domain do not scale as well as methods that replace the programmer with a powerful general-purpose learning procedure.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Luckily, current GPUs, paired with a highly optimized implementation of 2D convolution, are powerful enough to facilitate the training of interestinglylarge CNNs”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“they also make strong and mostly correct assumptions about the nature of images (namely, stationarity of statistics and locality of pixel dependencies).”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite the attractive qualities of CNNs, and despite the relative efficiency of their local architecture, they have still been prohibitively expensive to apply in large scale to highresolution images.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“ImageNet, 7 which consists of over 15 million labeled high-resolution images in over 22,000 categories.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [7] 7. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., Fei-Fei, L. ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In CVPR09 (2009). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which is considerably better than the previous state-of-the-art”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With enough computation and enough data, learning beats programming for complicated tasks that require the integration of many different, noisy cues.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and recent datasets such as ImageNet contain enough labeled examples to train such models without severe overfitting.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“for deep neural networks to shine, they needed far more labeled data and hugely more computation.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 1. PROLOGUE
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If at least some training examples produce a positive input to a ReLU, learning will happen in that neuron.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“To learn about thousands of objects from millions of images, we need a model with a large learning capacity.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The constants k, n, α, and β are hyperparameters whose values are determined using a validation set”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.3. Local response normalization
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, on this dataset the primary concern is preventing overfitting, so the effect they are observing is different from the accelerated ability to fit the training set which we report when using ReLUs.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.1. Rectified Linear Unit nonlinearity
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“since then the best published results are 45.7% and 25.7% with an approach that averages the predictions of two classifiers trained on Fisher Vectors (FVs) computed from two types of densely sampled features.29”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 7. RESULTS
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [29] 29. Sánchez, J., Perronnin, F. High- dimensional signature compression for large-scale image classification. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2011 (2011). IEEE, 1665-1672. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Combining the predictions of many different models is a very successful way to reduce test errors, 1, 3”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
What the sources say
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A statement the paper makes itself — it cites no source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but it appears to be too expensive for big neural networks that already take several days to train.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 5.2. Dropout
hedgedstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“The best published results on this dataset are 78.1% and 60.9%.23”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > Model
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] 23. Mensink, T., Verbeek, J., Perronnin, F., Csurka, G. Metric learning for large scale image classification: Generalizing to new classes at near-zero cost. In ECCV -European Conference on Computer Vision (Florence, Italy, Oct. 2012). source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Objects in realistic settings exhibit considerable variability.
“But objects in realistic settings exhibit considerable variability”
The paper relies on this without support.
Object identity is invariant to changes in the intensity and color of illumination.
“object identity is invariant to changes in the intensity and color of the illumination.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Fall 2009 ImageNet split used by the authors, which differs from previous authors' splits, does not affect the results appreciably.
“Since there is no established test set, our split necessarily differs from the splits used by previous authors, but this does not affect the results appreciably.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the field of DL, the CNN is the most famous and commonly employed algorithm [30, 71–75].”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), built for spatial data, have demonstrated performance comparable to that of specialists in cancer detection and tumor segmentation [15,16,17,18,19,20].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Deep CNN architectures with 8, even 22 layers [4], [33], can be useful even for CADe problems where the available training datasets are limited.”
From Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: cnn architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Fully convolutional neural networks (fCNNs) have provided state-of-the-art performance for object classification and image segmentation (1).”
From Fully automated, real-time 3D ultrasound segmentation to estimate first trimester placental volume using deep learning (2018) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The first wave saw the emergence of deep learning as the dominant paradigm for analyzing high-dimensional biological data.”
From The next paradigm in bioinformatics: a review of multi-agent systems and foundational models for end-to-end scientific discovery (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Krizhevesky et al. [30] first proposed AlexNet and consequently improved the CNN learning ability by increasing its depth and implementing several parameter optimization strategies.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In deep CNN architecture, AlexNet is highly respected [30], as it achieved innovative results in the fields of image recognition and classification.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Many CNN models, e.g. AlexNet [30], GoogleNet [103], and ResNet [37], have been trained on large datasets such as ImageNet for image recognition purposes.”
From Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“To avoid model-specific biases, two different AI models, AlexNet [22] and VGG16 [38], were selected for classification.”
From Study on the Helpfulness of Explainable Artificial Intelligence (2024) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In particular, the choice of this specific size is based on the fact that the AlexNet 34 (and also similar CNN architectures) has been shown to offer satisfactory performances with an input matrix of that size or very similar, albeit for different types of problems with respect to the one presented in this work (e.g., image classification).”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Jung et al. [21] found that a reduction in accuracy does not occur when using only four bits for both weight and activation parameters, even for the ImageNet dataset [32].”
From Zero-Centered Fixed-Point Quantization With Iterative Retraining for Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Object Detectors (2021) · cites this paper as [32]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Feature-based approaches [17,18,19] commonly employ networks pre-trained on ImageNet [20] to map original images into a more distinguishable feature space. These methods are typically characterized by low training costs and outstanding performance.”
From An Unsupervised Method for Industrial Image Anomaly Detection with Vision Transformer-Based Autoencoder (2024) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Over the past several years, the successes of deep learning on visual tasks has critically relied on convolutional neural networks [20, 16].”
From Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks? (2021) · cites this paper as [20]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“A common perception metric is the Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) which uses pre-trained deep neural network backbones such as VGG [9] and AlexNet [22].”
From MTReD: 3D Reconstruction Dataset for Fly-over Videos of Maritime Domain (2025) · cites this paper as [22]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Starting with the the success of AlexNet [5] in the ILSVRC challenge [6] in 2012, deep learning models have been outperforming traditional approaches on a number of computer vision problems.”
From Satellite Pose Estimation Challenge: Dataset, Competition Design, and Results (2020) · cites this paper as [5]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Real-time volume estimation has been achieved using fully convolutional neural networks (FCNNs) [11] to produce state-of-the-art performance in a range of medical imaging modalities [12].”
From Fully Automated 3-D Ultrasound Segmentation of the Placenta, Amniotic Fluid, and Fetus for Early Pregnancy Assessment (2021) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Unfortunately, it has been acknowledged that the performance of those hashing schemes may degrade significantly if the projected dimensions are imbalanced [4], [6], [13], i.e., their variances vary a lot.”
From Unsupervised Deep Video Hashing via Balanced Code for Large-Scale Video Retrieval (2019) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“When convolutional RBMs are stacked together, they form convolutional deep belief networks [22].”
From Multimodal emotion recognition using deep learning architectures (2016) · cites this paper as [22]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“When a low-capacity model, such as AlexNet, is used for pre-training, little improvement can be obtained when compared to the Resnet50 family [26].”
From Self-supervised learning: A succinct review (2023) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Since its introduction by Krizhevsky et al. [7] in 2012, the CNN model has been successfully applied to a wide range of multimodal applications, such as image dehazing [239, 240] and human activity recognition [241].”
From A survey on deep multimodal learning for computer vision: advances, trends, applications, and datasets (2022) · cites this paper as [7]
In the citing paper
“The AlexNet architecture was published in [4], achieved significantly improved performance over the other non-deep learning methods for ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) 2012.”
From Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: cnn architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“focusing on AI and deep learning architectures that have already become the de facto approach.”
From AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions (2020) · cites this paper as [101]
In the citing paper
“Since then, fueled by the revolutionary results of AlexNet [101] and incarnations of patch-based adaptations of Deep Boltzmann Machines and stacked autoencoders, deep learning based segmentation of anatomy and pathology has witnessed a revolution (see also Table II), where for some tasks now we observe human level performance [102].”
From AI in Medical Imaging Informatics: Current Challenges and Future Directions (2020) · cites this paper as [101]
In the citing paper
“ReLU significantly increases the rate of con-vergence of stochastic gradient descent in comparison with the sigmoid [26].”
From Real-time system for automatic cold strip surface defect detection (2019) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 2. INTRODUCTION
“we found that removing any convolutional layer (each of which contains no more than 1% of the model's parameters) resulted in inferior performance.”
§ ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks > 4.5. Overall architecture
“The third convolutional layer has 384 kernels of size 3 × 3 × 256”
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Going deeper with convolutions
Szegedy, C., Liu, W., Jia, Y., Sermanet, P., Reed, S., Anguelov, D., Erhan, D., Vanhoucke, V., & Rabinovich, A. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298594 · Cited by 48,562
Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images
Krizhevsky, A. (2024) · doi:10.57702/zp44cu3g · Cited by 23,889
Self-citationLearning Internal Representations by Error Propagation
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1985) · doi:10.21236/ada164453 · Cited by 16,501
Self-citation(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Self-citationImproving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors
Hinton, G. E., Srivastava, N., Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1207.0580 · Cited by 6,382
Self-citationFukushima, K. (1980) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00344251 · Cited by 5,759
LabelMe: A Database and Web-Based Tool for Image Annotation
Russell, B. C., Torralba, A., Murphy, K. P., & Freeman, W. T. (2008) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-007-0090-8 · Cited by 4,210
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.03385 · Cited by 4,196
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Berg A., 2010, Large scale visual recognition challenge
- Deng J., 2009, CVPR09
- Krizhevsky A., 2009, Department of Computer Science
- Krizhevsky A., 2010, Convolutional deep belief networks on cifar-10. Unpublished manuscript
- Krizhevsky A., 2011, ESANN
- LeCun Y., 1990, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems
- LeCun Y., 1985, Une procedure d'apprentissage pour reseau a seuil asymmetrique (a learning scheme for asymmetric threshold networks)
- 10.5555/1896300.1896315 · DOI
- Mensink T., 2012, Italy
- 10.5555/3104322.3104425 · DOI
- Rumelhart D.E., 1985, DTIC Document
- 10.5555/938980.939477 · DOI
- Werbos P., 1974, Beyond regression: New tools for prediction and analysis in the behavioral sciences
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 84,101–84,200 of 108,437
Generalized DropoutPreprint
Srinivas, S., & Babu, R. V. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1611.06791 · Cited by 30
Understanding Notions of Stationarity in Non-Smooth OptimizationPreprint
Li, J., So, A. M., & Ma, W. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.14901 · Cited by 2
On the Demystification of Knowledge Distillation: A Residual Network PerspectivePreprint
Jha, N. K., Saini, R., & Mittal, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.16589 · Cited by 2
Meta-Learning with Network PruningPreprint
Tian, H., Liu, B., Yuan, X., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.03219 · Cited by 2
Can We Achieve More with Less? Exploring Data Augmentation for Toxic Comment ClassificationPreprint
Rastogi, C., Mofid, N., & Hsiao, F.-I. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.00875 · Cited by 18
Is Robustness To Transformations Driven by Invariant Neural RepresentationsPreprint
Zaidi, S. S. A., Boix, X., Prasad, N., Gilad‐Gutnick, S., Ben-Ami, S., & Sinha, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
Simulating multi-exit evacuation using deep reinforcement learningPreprint
Xu, D., Huang, X., Mango, J., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.05783 · Cited by 2
Attention-based Residual Speech Portrait Model for Speech to Face GenerationPreprint
Wang, J., Hu, X., Liu, L., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.04536 · Cited by 2
Crossterm-Free Time-Frequency Representation Exploiting Deep Convolutional Neural NetworkPreprint
Zhang, S., & Zhang, Y. D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.03570 · Cited by 2
van Dyck, L. E., & Gruber, W. R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.06294 · Cited by 4
Adaptive Periodic Averaging: A Practical Approach to Reducing Communication in Distributed LearningPreprint
Jiang, P., & Agrawal, G. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.06134 · Cited by 5
Paganini, M., & Forde, J. Z. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.04091 · Cited by 4
Lightweight image super-resolution with enhanced CNNPreprint
Tian, C., Zhuge, R., Wu, Z., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.04344 · Cited by 2
AQD: Towards Accurate Fully-Quantized Object DetectionPreprint
Chen, P., Liu, J., Zhuang, B., Tan, M., & Shen, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.06919 · Cited by 1
Yin, R., Luo, Z., & Kwoh, C. K. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.15.176933 · Cited by 2
How to trust unlabeled data? Instance Credibility Inference for Few-Shot LearningPreprint
Wang, Y., Zhang, L., Yao, Y., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.08461 · Cited by 2
A Deep Ordinal Distortion Estimation Approach for Distortion RectificationPreprint
Liao, K., Lin, C., & Zhao, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.10689 · Cited by 2
SADet: Learning An Efficient and Accurate Pedestrian DetectorPreprint
Zhuang, C., Lei, Z., & Li, S. Z. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.13119 · Cited by 2
Interactive Feature Generation via Learning Adjacency Tensor of Feature Graph.Preprint
Xie, Y., Wang, Z., Li, Y., Ding, B., Gürel, N. M., Zhang, C., Huang, M., Lin, W. Y., & Zhou, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
TopoAct: Visually Exploring the Shape of Activations in Deep LearningPreprint
Rathore, A., Chalapathi, N., Palande, S., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.06332 · Cited by 2
CoCoNet: Boosting RNA contact prediction by convolutional neural networksPreprint
Zerihun, M. B., Pucci, F., & Schug, A. H. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.07.30.229484 · Cited by 2
DeepVA: Bridging Cognition and Computation through Semantic Interaction and Deep LearningPreprint
Bian, Y., Wenskovitch, J. E., & North, C. L. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.15800 · Cited by 2
Jiang, Y., Li, Y., Zou, S., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.01421 · Cited by 2
Learning to Play Two-Player Perfect-Information Games without KnowledgePreprint
Cohen-Solal, Q. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.01188 · Cited by 17
Hinzmann, T., Stegemann, T., Cadena, C., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.04197 · Cited by 2
A Survey on Large-scale Machine LearningPreprint
Wang, M., Fu, W., He, X., Hao, S., & Wu, X. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.03911 · Cited by 2
Bio-Inspired Attentive Segmentation of Retinal OCT imagingPreprint
Lazaridis, G., Xu, M., Afgeh, S. S., et al. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.08.13.20174250 · Cited by 2
Kasaei, H., Melsen, J., van Beers, F., Steenkist, C., & Voncina, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2003.08151 · Cited by 2
asya: Mindful verbal communication using deep learningPreprint
Urtāns, Ē., & Tabaks, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.08965 · Cited by 2
An ETF view of Dropout regularizationPreprint
Bank, D., & Giryes, R. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.06049 · Cited by 2
Matching Guided DistillationPreprint
Yue, K., Deng, J., & Zhou, F. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.09958 · Cited by 2
Adversarial Image Generation and Training for Deep Neural NetworksPreprint
Shu, H., Shi, R., Zhu, H., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
Temporal Attribute-Appearance Learning Network for Video-based Person Re-IdentificationPreprint
Liu, J., Zhu, X., & Zha, Z.-J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.04181 · Cited by 2
On the Orthogonality of Knowledge Distillation with Other Techniques: From an Ensemble PerspectivePreprint
Park, S., Yoo, K., & Kwak, N. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.04120 · Cited by 2
Latency and Throughput Optimization in Modern Networks: A Comprehensive SurveyPreprint
Mirzaeinia, A., Mirzaeinia, M., & Rezgui, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.03715 · Cited by 12
Guest Editorial: Generative Adversarial Networks for Computer Vision
Zhu, J.-Y., Li, H., Shechtman, E., et al. (2020) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-020-01380-5 · Cited by 2
Defending against substitute model black box adversarial attacks with the 01 lossPreprint
Xue, Y., Xie, M., & Roshan, U. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.09803 · Cited by 2
Data-driven and machine learning based design creativity
Chen, L. (2020) · Spiral (Imperial College London) · doi:10.25560/82639 · Cited by 2
FuncNN: An R Package to Fit Deep Neural Networks Using Generalized Input SpacesPreprint
Thind, B., Wu, S., Groenewald, R., & Cao, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.09111 · Cited by 3
Renovating Parsing R-CNN for Accurate Multiple Human ParsingPreprint
Yang, L., Song, Q., Wang, Z., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.09447 · Cited by 2
Accelerating Multi-Model Inference by Merging DNNs of Different WeightsPreprint
Jeong, J. S., Kim, S., Yu, G.-I., Lee, Y., & Chun, B.-G. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.13062 · Cited by 4
Learning to Stop: A Simple yet Effective Approach to Urban Vision-Language NavigationPreprint
Xiang, J., Wang, X. E., & Wang, W. Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.13112 · Cited by 2
Development of Knowledge Extraction Methodology from Trained Artificial Neural Networks
Bondarenko, A. N. (2020) · doi:10.7250/9789934221408 · Cited by 2
Deep Anomaly Detection by Residual AdaptationPreprint
Deecke, L., Ruff, L., Vandermeulen, R. A., & Bilen, H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.02310 · Cited by 9
Learning Partially Observed Linear Dynamical Systems from Logarithmic Number of SamplesPreprint
Fattahi, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.04015 · Cited by 2
Decamouflage: A Framework to Detect Image-Scaling Attacks on Convolutional Neural NetworksPreprint
Kim, B., Abuadbba, A., Gao, Y., Zheng, Y., Ahmed, M. E., Kim, H., & Nepal, . (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.03735 · Cited by 2
Smoother Network Tuning and Interpolation for Continuous-level Image ProcessingPreprint
Lee, H., Kim, T., Son, H., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.02270 · Cited by 2
Li, Q., Mai, L., Alcorn, M. A., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.04760 · Cited by 2
Mei, Y., Sun, X., & Xu, N. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.09226 · Cited by 2
Automatic Arterial Wall Detection and Diameter Tracking Using M-mode Ultrasound
Venugopal, S. K. (2020) · Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · doi:10.22215/etd/2020-13971 · Cited by 2
Online Anomaly Detection in Surveillance Videos with Asymptotic Bounds on False Alarm RatePreprint
Doshi, K., & Yılmaz, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.07110 · Cited by 2
Takai, Y., Sannai, A., & Cordonnier, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.12125 · Cited by 3
A Convolutional Network Architecture Driven by Mouse Neuroanatomical DataPreprint
Shi, J., Buice, M. A., Shea‐Brown, E., Mihalaş, Ş., & Tripp, B. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.10.23.353151 · Cited by 2
Investigating and Simplifying Masking-based Saliency Methods for Model InterpretabilityPreprint
Phang, J., Park, J., & Geras, K. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.09750 · Cited by 10
Learning to Recognize Actionable Static Code Warnings (is Intrinsically Easy)Preprint
Yang, X., Chen, J., Yedida, R., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.00444 · Cited by 2
Evaluating data augmentation for financial time series classificationPreprint
Fons, E., Dawson, P., Zeng, X., Keane, J. A., & Iosifidis, A. (2020) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.15111 · Cited by 31
Oyelade, O. N., & Ezugwu, A. E.-S. (2020) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2020.10.30.20222786 · Cited by 2
Optimal Textures: Fast and Robust Texture Synthesis and Style Transfer through Optimal TransportPreprint
Risser, E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.14702 · Cited by 7
Accelerated WGAN update strategy with loss change rate balancingPreprint
Ouyang, X., & Agam, G. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.12463 · Cited by 2
Issa, E. B., Cadieu, C. F., & DiCarlo, J. J. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/092551 · Cited by 2
Enhanced Artistic Image Style Transfer Using Convolutional Neural NetworksPreprint
Santhi, H., Gopichand, G., & Gayathri, P. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3354412 · Cited by 2
Adversarial collision attacks on image hashing functions
Dolhansky, B., & Ferrer, C. C. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.09473 · Cited by 13
Amadeus: Scalable, Privacy-Preserving Live Video AnalyticsPreprint
D'Souza, S. M., Bahl, P., Ao, L., & Cox, L. P. (2020) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.05163 · Cited by 11
Multigrid-in-Channels Neural Network ArchitecturesPreprint
Eliasof, M., Ephrath, J., Ruthotto, L., & Treister, E. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
Deep Learning for Automated Screening of Tuberculosis from Indian Chest X-rays: Analysis and UpdatePreprint
Singh, A., Lall, B., Panigrahi, B. K., Agrawal, A., Agrawal, A., Thangakunam, B., & Christopher, D. J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.09778 · Cited by 3
ShadowNet: A Secure and Efficient On-device Model Inference System for Convolutional Neural NetworksPreprint
Sun, Z., Sun, R., Lu, L. J., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.05905 · Cited by 2
Detecting Adversarial Patches with Class Conditional Reconstruction NetworksPreprint
Deng, P., Rahman, M. S., & Wright, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.05850 · Cited by 2
Road Information Extraction from Mobile LiDAR Point Clouds using Deep Neural Networks
Ma, L. (2020) · UWSpace (University of Waterloo) · Cited by 2
FP-NAS: Fast Probabilistic Neural Architecture SearchPreprint
Yan, Z., Dai, X., Zhang, P., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.10949 · Cited by 2
Stochastic Adversarial Gradient Embedding for Active Domain AdaptationPreprint
Bouvier, V., Very, P., Chastagnol, C., Tami, M., & Hudelot, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.01843 · Cited by 2
Biologically-inspired Salience Affected Artificial Neural Network (SANN)Preprint
Remmelzwaal, L. A., Ellis, G., Tapson, J. C., & Mishra, A. K. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.03532 · Cited by 4
Generating private data with user customizationPreprint
Chen, X. D., Navidi, T., & Rajagopal, R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.01467 · Cited by 2
Investigating Emotion-Color Association in Deep Neural NetworksPreprint
Gupta, S., & Gupta, S. K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.11058 · Cited by 3
Yun, S., & Wong, A. M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.14578 · Cited by 2
Learning Affinity-Aware Upsampling for Deep Image MattingPreprint
Dai, Y., Lü, H., & Shen, C. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.14288 · Cited by 2
Improving Augmentation and Evaluation Schemes for Semantic Image SynthesisPreprint
Katiyar, P., & Khoreva, A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.12636 · Cited by 2
Rethinking Text Segmentation: A Novel Dataset and A Text-Specific Refinement ApproachPreprint
Xu, X., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.14021 · Cited by 2
Xie, H., Hussein, M. E., Galstyan, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.00150 · Cited by 2
A Response Retrieval Approach for Dialogue Using a Multi-Attentive TransformerPreprint
Senese, M. A., Benincasa, A., Barbara Caputo, B., & Rizzo, G. F. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08148 · Cited by 4
Exploring Vicinal Risk Minimization for Lightweight Out-of-Distribution DetectionPreprint
Ravikumar, D., Kodge, S., Garg, I., & Roy, K. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08398 · Cited by 4
The Representation Power of Neural Networks: Breaking the Curse of DimensionalityPreprint
Blanchard, M., & Bennouna, M. A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.05451 · Cited by 6
Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Segmentation -- A Survey of Supervised CNN-Based MethodsPreprint
Zhang, H., & Oğuz, İ. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08317 · Cited by 2
Distant Domain Transfer Learning for Medical ImagingPreprint
Niu, S., Liu, M., Liu, Y., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.06346 · Cited by 2
Domain Adaptive Object Detection via Feature Separation and AlignmentPreprint
Liang, C., Zhao, Z., Liu, J., & Zhang, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08689 · Cited by 3
Selective Pseudo-Labeling with Reinforcement Learning for Semi-Supervised Domain AdaptationPreprint
Liu, B., Guo, Y., Ye, J., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.03438 · Cited by 2
A Mechanical Parts Image Segmentation Method Against Illumination for IndustryPreprint
Xie, X. L., Wan, T., Wang, B., Xu, L., & Li, X. (2020) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-119471/v1 · Cited by 2
CT Super Resolution via Zero Shot LearningPreprint
Zhang, Z., Yu, S., Qin, W., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08943 · Cited by 4
Exploring Fluent Query Reformulations with Text-to-Text Transformers and Reinforcement LearningPreprint
Chen, J. Z., Shi, Y., & Wang, H. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.10033 · Cited by 4
Towards a Universal Continuous Knowledge BasePreprint
Chen, G., Sun, M., & Liu, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.13568 · Cited by 2
Humanoid: A Deep Learning-based Approach to Automated Black-box Android App TestingPreprint
Li, Y., Yang, Z., Guo, Y., et al. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1901.02633 · Cited by 2
Classification of Pathological and Normal Gait: A SurveyPreprint
Saxe, R. C., Kappagoda, S., & Mordecai, D. K. A. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.14465 · Cited by 2
Nakka, K. K., & Salzmann, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.15183 · Cited by 2
Inception Convolution with Efficient Dilation SearchPreprint
Liu, J., Li, C., Liang, F., Chen, L., Sun, M., Yan, J., Ouyang, W., & Xu, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.13587 · Cited by 1
Knowledge-Driven Machine Learning: Concept, Model and Case Study on Channel EstimationPreprint
Li, D., Deng, K., Zhao, M., Zhang, S., & Zhu, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.11178 · Cited by 2
Training Deep Architectures Without End-to-End Backpropagation: A Brief SurveyPreprint
Duan, S., & Príncipe, J. C. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 2
Plant recognition, detection, and counting with deep learning
Pawara, P. (2021) · doi:10.33612/diss.156115978 · Cited by 2
Negative-ResNet: Noisy Ambulatory Electrocardiogram Signal Classification SchemePreprint
Chen, Z., Lin, Z., Wang, P., et al. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.10061 · Cited by 2
Analysis of skin lesion images with deep learningPreprint
Steppan, J., & Hanke, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.03814 · Cited by 28
Computer vision beyond the visible : image understanding through language
Aguilera, A. S. (2019) · UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) · doi:10.5821/dissertation-2117-166156 · Cited by 2
Active Screening for Recurrent Diseases: A Reinforcement Learning ApproachPreprint
Ou, H.-C., Chen, H., Jabbari, S., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.02766 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2017-05-24
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 84-90
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2163605009
- Cited by
- 112,155
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2710 · 2025: 7710 · 2024: 10211 · 2023: 12267 · 2022: 12280 · 2021: 15497 · 2020: 14538 · 2019: 13976 · 2018: 9999 · 2017: 6661
- FWCI
- 5127.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- neural information processing systems
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Keywords
- ImageNet, image classification, deep convolutional neural networks, dropout regularization, overfitting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
