The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DeepSD: Generating High Resolution Climate Change Projections through Single Image Super-Resolution
Abstract
The impacts of climate change are felt by most critical systems, such as infrastructure, ecological systems, and power-plants. However, contemporary Earth System Models (ESM) are run at spatial resolutions too coarse for assessing effects this localized. Local scale projections can be obtained using statistical downscaling, a technique which uses historical climate observations to learn a low-resolution to high-resolution mapping. Depending on statistical modeling choices, downscaled projections have been shown to vary significantly terms of accuracy and reliability. The spatio-temporal nature of the climate system motivates the adaptation of super-resolution image processing techniques to statistical downscaling. In our work, we present DeepSD, a generalized stacked super resolution convolutional neural network (SRCNN) framework for statistical downscaling of climate variables. DeepSD augments SRCNN with multi-scale input channels to maximize predictability in statistical downscaling. We provide a comparison with Bias Correction Spatial Disaggregation as well as three Automated-Statistical Downscaling approaches in downscaling daily precipitation from 1 degree (~100km) to 1/8 degrees (~12.5km) over the Continental United States. Furthermore, a framework using the NASA Earth Exchange (NEX) platform is discussed for downscaling more than 20 ESM models with multiple emission scenarios.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Overview of CMIP5 and the Experiment Design
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., & Meehl, G. A. (2012) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1 · Cited by 14,052
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408
Super-resolution from a single image
Glasner, D., Bagon, S., & Irani, M. (2009) · 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2009.5459271 · Cited by 1,889
Cited by
Configuration and intercomparison of deep learning neural models for statistical downscaling
Baño-Medina, J., Manzanas, R., & Gutiérrez, J. M. (2020) · Geoscientific Model Development · doi:10.5194/gmd-13-2109-2020 · Cited by 282
Sha, Y., Gagne II, D. J., West, G., & Stull, R. (2020) · Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology · doi:10.1175/jamc-d-20-0057.1 · Cited by 141
Lafferty, D. C., & Sriver, R. L. (2023) · npj Climate and Atmospheric Science · doi:10.1038/s41612-023-00486-0 · Cited by 139
Optimizing quantum heuristics with meta-learning
Wilson, M., Stromswold, R., Wudarski, F., Hadfield, S., Tubman, N. M., & Rieffel, E. G. (2021) · Quantum Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s42484-020-00022-w · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Vandal, T., Kodra, E., Ganguly, S., Michaelis, A., Nemani, R., & Ganguly, A. R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2017-08-13
- Pages
- 1663-1672
- OpenAlex
- W2604521289
- Cited by
- 281
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 59.98
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DeepSD: Generating High Resolution Climate Change Projections through Single Image Super-Resolution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3097983.3098004
- The paper
- Vandal, T., Kodra, E., Ganguly, S., Michaelis, A., Nemani, R., & Ganguly, A. R. (2017). DeepSD: Generating High Resolution Climate Change Projections through Single Image Super-Resolution. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.3098004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.