The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep Choice Model Using Pointer Networks for Airline Itinerary Prediction
Abstract
Travel providers such as airlines and on-line travel agents are becoming more and more interested in understanding how passengers choose among alternative itineraries when searching for flights. This knowledge helps them better display and adapt their offer, taking into account market conditions and customer needs. Some common applications are not only filtering and sorting alternatives, but also changing certain attributes in real-time (e.g., changing the price). In this paper, we concentrate with the problem of modeling air passenger choices of flight itineraries. This problem has historically been tackled using classical Discrete Choice Modelling techniques. Traditional statistical approaches, in particular the Multinomial Logit model (MNL), is widely used in industrial applications due to its simplicity and general good performance. However, MNL models present several shortcomings and assumptions that might not hold in real applications. To overcome these difficulties, we present a new choice model based on Pointer Networks. Given an input sequence, this type of deep neural architecture combines Recurrent Neural Networks with the Attention Mechanism to learn the conditional probability of an output whose values correspond to positions in an input sequence. Therefore, given a sequence of different alternatives presented to a customer, the model can learn to point to the one most likely to be chosen by the customer. The proposed method was evaluated on a real dataset that combines on-line user search logs and airline flight bookings. Experimental results show that the proposed model outperforms the traditional MNL model on several metrics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Therefore, researchers have developed various other models as well, e.g., integrating machine learning ( Lhéritier et al., 2019; Mottini and Acuna-Agost, 2017 ) and big data ( Mottini et al., 2018 ).”
From Status quo and challenges in air transport management research (2024) · cites this paper as Mottini and Acuna-Agost, 2017
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939785 · Cited by 54,569
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766
Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate
Bahdanau, D., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.0473 · Cited by 16,213
Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior
McFadden, D. L. (1972) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 14,203
Effective Approaches to Attention-based Neural Machine Translation
Luong, T., Pham, H., & Manning, C. D. (2015) · Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/d15-1166 · Cited by 8,382
Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand.
Uncles, M. D., Ben-Akiva, M., & Lerman, S. R. (1987) · The Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.2307/2582065 · Cited by 5,527
Bobadilla, J., Ortega, F., Hernando, A., & Gutiérrez, A. (2013) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2013.03.012 · Cited by 3,158
Vinyals, O., Fortunato, M., & Jaitly, N. (2015) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 2,043
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- G.M. Coldren , F.S. Koppelman , K. Kasturirangan , and A. Mukherjee 2003. Air travel itinerary share prediction: Logit model development at a major U.S airline 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board . G.M. Coldren, F.S. Koppelman, K. Kasturirangan, and A. Mukherjee 2003. Air travel itinerary share prediction: Logit model development at a major U.S airline 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
- 10.5555/2770678.2770682 · doi:10.5555/2770678.2770682
- 10.3141/1951-02 · DOI
Cited by
Status quo and challenges in air transport management research
Wandelt, S., Antoniou, C., Birolini, S., Delahaye, D., Dresner, M., Fu, X., Gössling, S., Hong, S.-J., Odoni, A. R., Zanin, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of the Air Transport Research Society · doi:10.1016/j.jatrs.2024.100014 · Cited by 67
(2018) · ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys)
Metadata
- Authors
- Mottini, A., & Acuna-Agost, R.
- Affiliations
- Amadeus SAS, Nice, France
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2017-08-13
- Pages
- 1575-1583
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 41
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.