Cited by 779Advanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesMultimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Adversarial Cross-Modal Retrieval

Open access
Wang, Bokun, Yang, Yang, Xu, Xing, Hanjalic, Alan, Shen, Heng Tao·2017·Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia

Abstract

Cross-modal retrieval aims to enable flexible retrieval experience across different modalities (e.g., texts vs. images). The core of cross-modal retrieval research is to learn a common subspace where the items of different modalities can be directly compared to each other. In this paper, we present a novel Adversarial Cross-Modal Retrieval (ACMR) method, which seeks an effective common subspace based on adversarial learning. Adversarial learning is implemented as an interplay between two processes. The first process, a feature projector, tries to generate a modality-invariant representation in the common subspace and to confuse the other process, modality classifier, which tries to discriminate between different modalities based on the generated representation. We further impose triplet constraints on the feature projector in order to minimize the gap among the representations of all items from different modalities with same semantic labels, while maximizing the distances among semantically different images and texts. Through the joint exploitation of the above, the underlying cross-modal semantic structure of multimedia data is better preserved when this data is projected into the common subspace. Comprehensive experimental results on four widely used benchmark datasets show that the proposed ACMR method is superior in learning effective subspace representation and that it significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art cross-modal retrieval methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3123266.3123326

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, B., Yang, Y., Xu, X., Hanjalic, A., & Shen, H. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
  • Delft University of Technology, Amsterdam, Holland
Venue
Proceedings of the 25th ACM international conference on Multimedia
Publisher
ACM
Published
2017-10-19
Pages
154-162
OpenAlex
W2765440071
Cited by
779
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 56 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 139 · 2019: 96 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 1
FWCI
22.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM International Conference on Multimedia (ACM MM) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61572108, 61602089, 61632007)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ZYGX2014Z007, ZYGX2015J055)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
cross-modal retrieval, adversarial learning, common subspace learning, modality-invariant representations, image-text retrieval, multimodal representation learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review