The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Relevance-Based Language Models
Abstract
We explore the relation between classical probabilistic models of information retrieval and the emerging language modeling approaches. It has long been recognized that the primary obstacle to effective performance of classical models is the need to estimate a relevance model: probabilities of words in the relevant class. We propose a novel technique for estimating these probabilities using the query alone. We demonstrate that our technique can produce highly accurate relevance models, addressing important notions of synonymy and polysemy. Our experiments show relevance models outperforming baseline language modeling systems on TREC retrieval and TDT tracking tasks. The main contribution of this work is an effective formal method for estimating a relevance model with no training data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE PROBABILITY RANKING PRINCIPLE IN IR
ROBERTSON, S. E. (1977) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eb026647 · Cited by 1,103
Cited by
Understanding inverse document frequency: on theoretical arguments for IDF
Robertson, S. (2004) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410410560582 · Cited by 1,541
A Study of Smoothing Methods for Language Models Applied to Ad Hoc Information Retrieval
Zhai, C., & Lafferty, J. (2017) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/3130348.3130377 · Cited by 1,537
A Survey of Automatic Query Expansion in Information Retrieval
Carpineto, C., & Romano, G. (2012) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2071389.2071390 · Cited by 1,109
Interpreting TF-IDF term weights as making relevance decisions
Wu, H. C., Luk, R. W. P., Wong, K. F., & Kwok, K. L. (2008) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/1361684.1361686 · Cited by 821
Query expansion techniques for information retrieval: a survey
Azad, H. K., & Deepak, A. (2019) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2019.05.009 · Cited by 313
Metadata
- Authors
- Lavrenko, V., & Croft, W. B.
- Venue
- ACM SIGIR Forum
- Published
- 2017-08-02
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 260-267
- ISSN
- 0163-5840 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169213601
- Cited by
- 1,422
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 128.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relevance-Based Language Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3130348.3130376
- The paper
- Lavrenko, V., & Croft, W. B. (2017). Relevance-Based Language Models. ACM SIGIR Forum. https://doi.org/10.1145/3130348.3130376
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.