Conspiracy Talk on Social Media: Collective Sensemaking during a Public Health Crisis
Abstract
Conspiracy theories have gained much academic and media attention recently, due to their large impact on public events. Crisis informatics researchers have examined conspiracy theories as a type of rumor. However, little is known about how conspiracy theories are produced and developed on social media. We present a qualitative study of conspiracy theorizing on Reddit during a public health crisis--the Zika virus outbreak. Using a mixed-methods approach including content analysis and discourse analysis, we identified types of conspiracy theories that appeared on Reddit in response to the Zika crisis, the conditions under which Zika conspiracy theories emerge, and the particular discursive strategies through which Zika conspiracy theories developed in online forums. Our analysis shows that conspiracy talk emerged as people attempted to make sense of a public health crisis, reflecting their emergent information needs and their pervasive distrust in formal sources of Zika information. Practical implications for social computing researchers, health practitioners, and policymakers are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The findings align with the assumption that conspiracy theories flourish in times of uncertainty and serve as a form of collective sense making.
“Overall, our findings align with the assumption that conspiracy theories flourish in times of uncertainty (van Prooijen & Jostmann, 2013) and serve as a form of collective sense making (Kou et al., 2017).”
From The Seed of Doubt: Examining the Role of Alternative Social and News Media for the Birth of a Conspiracy Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Kou et al., 2017
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 61 · Cited by 103
- Authors
- Kou, Y., Gui, X., Chen, Y., & Pine, K.
- Affiliations
- Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
- Published
- 2017-12-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- CSCW
- Pages
- 1-21
- ISSN
- 2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2773680786
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 61
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 8.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- International Olympic Committee
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, social media, Reddit, Zika virus outbreak, public health crisis, online forums, discursive strategies, information needs, rumors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review