Cited by 103Misinformation and Its ImpactsPublic Relations and Crisis CommunicationCommunication and COVID-19 Impact

Conspiracy Talk on Social Media: Collective Sensemaking during a Public Health Crisis

Kou, Yubo, Gui, Xinning, Chen, Yunan, Pine, Kathleen·2017·Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Conspiracy theories have gained much academic and media attention recently, due to their large impact on public events. Crisis informatics researchers have examined conspiracy theories as a type of rumor. However, little is known about how conspiracy theories are produced and developed on social media. We present a qualitative study of conspiracy theorizing on Reddit during a public health crisis--the Zika virus outbreak. Using a mixed-methods approach including content analysis and discourse analysis, we identified types of conspiracy theories that appeared on Reddit in response to the Zika crisis, the conditions under which Zika conspiracy theories emerge, and the particular discursive strategies through which Zika conspiracy theories developed in online forums. Our analysis shows that conspiracy talk emerged as people attempted to make sense of a public health crisis, reflecting their emergent information needs and their pervasive distrust in formal sources of Zika information. Practical implications for social computing researchers, health practitioners, and policymakers are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3134696

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The findings align with the assumption that conspiracy theories flourish in times of uncertainty and serve as a form of collective sense making.

    “Overall, our findings align with the assumption that conspiracy theories flourish in times of uncertainty (van Prooijen & Jostmann, 2013) and serve as a form of collective sense making (Kou et al., 2017).”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 61 · Cited by 103

Authors
Kou, Y., Gui, X., Chen, Y., & Pine, K.
Affiliations
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2017-12-06
Volume
1
Issue
CSCW
Pages
1-21
ISSN
2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2773680786
Cited by
103
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 9 · 2018: 3
FWCI
8.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
International Olympic Committee
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Public Relations and Crisis Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
Keywords
conspiracy theories, social media, Reddit, Zika virus outbreak, public health crisis, online forums, discursive strategies, information needs, rumors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review