The Seed of Doubt: Examining the Role of Alternative Social and News Media for the Birth of a Conspiracy Theory
Open accessAbstract
Consuming conspiracy theories erodes trust in democratic institutions, while conspiracy beliefs demotivate democratic participation, posing a potential threat to democracy. The proliferation of social media, especially the emergence of numerous alternative platforms with minimal moderation, has greatly facilitated the dissemination and consumption of conspiracy theories. Nevertheless, there remains a dearth of knowledge concerning the origin and evolution of specific conspiracy theories across different platforms. This study aims to address this gap through a large-scale, cross-platform examination of the genesis of new conspiracy theories surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein. Through a (semi-) automated content analysis conducted on a distinctive dataset comprising N = 8,020,314 Epstein-related posts posted on both established platforms ( Twitter, Reddit) and alternative platforms ( Gab and 4Chan), we demonstrate that conspiracy theories emerge early and influence public discourse well in advance of reports from established media sources. Our data shows that users of the studied platforms immediately turn to conspirational explanations, exhibiting skepticism towards the official representation of events. Especially on alternative platforms, this skepticism swiftly transformed into unwarranted conspiracy theorizing, partly bolstered by references to alternative news media sources. The present study shows how conspirational explanations thrive in low information environments and how alternative media plays a role in turning rational skepticism into unwarranted conspiracy theories.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This study traces the birth of conspiracy theories around Jeffrey Epstein’s death across 8,020,314 posts on Twitter, Reddit, Gab, and 4chan, showing conspiratorial interpretations appeared before established news reports and were more prevalent on alternative platforms. It argues that references to alternative news media help turn skepticism into unwarranted conspiracy theorizing.
Key findings
Across all four platforms, posting surged before the official news announcement of Epstein’s death; no platform reacted significantly faster, though the 4chan debate lasted longer. Manual coding of n = 300 posts found 34.00% contained an unwarranted conspiracy theory; shares were 36.00% before August 10, 38.00% on the day, and 28.00% afterward. Unwarranted conspiracy theories were more common on 4chan (56.00%) and Gab (42.67%) than on Twitter (22.67%) and Reddit (14.67%). Co-occurrence graphs linked Epstein’s death to Trump/Clintons, intelligence agencies, antisemitic narratives (especially 4chan), and QAnon/satanic-cult themes (Gab); 40.99% of posts contained a URL, with established news URLs most shared overall (4.41%, n = 13,162) but alternative news URLs also prominent (3.64%, n = 10,860), and users sharing alternative sources were more likely to reference unwarranted conspiracy theories.
Methods
Large-scale cross-platform computational content analysis of Epstein-related posts from August 8–26, 2019 on Twitter, Reddit, Gab, and 4chan’s /pol/ board (N = 8,020,314), segmented into pre-death (4.77%), day-of-death (21.40%), and afterward (73.83%). Co-occurrence graphs mapped semantic clusters, and a random sample of n = 300 posts (25 per platform per time segment) was manually coded for warranted vs. unwarranted conspiracy theories following Keeley (Krippendorff’s α = .89). External URLs were extracted and domains classified as established or alternative news media.
Limitations
Stated: the study is a single-event comparative case study, uses only text-based platforms, relies on a mixed automated/manual design that cannot capture all qualitative intricacies, cannot infer individual users’ beliefs or sharing motivations, and does not analyze the content of shared sources. Evident: the manual coding sample is small (n = 300; 25 posts per platform/time cell), 4chan data are limited to /pol/ via an archive, and platform data were collected through different APIs/archives, so cross-platform comparisons should be interpreted cautiously.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
4 of 27 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation§ Abstract · p. 2
The proliferation of social media, especially alternative platforms with minimal moderation, has greatly facilitated the dissemination and consumption of conspiracy theories.
“The proliferation of social media, especially the emergence of numerous alternative platforms with minimal moderation, has greatly facilitated the dissemination and consumption of conspiracy theories.”
- Also stated in: § Alternative Social Media Platforms · p. 5 · boosted
“the advent of social media has profoundly amplified the possibility to spread, disseminate, and consume them (Zeng et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Zeng et al., 2022 source
The ‘Affordance of digital media’ section (page unavailable) says digital media has amplified the visibility of conspiracy-theory content and that social-media platform dynamics can promote its circulation. The ‘Research conspiracy theories in digital environments’ section (page unavailable) notes migration to non-mainstream platforms, but does not say those platforms have minimal moderation or that their emergence has especially facilitated dissemination and consumption. The paper also questions whether digital media is the crucial cause of growth in conspiracy theories or belief in them. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Also stated in: § Alternative Social Media Platforms · p. 5 · boosted
- Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 3
Exposure to conspiracy theories undermines trust in democratic institutions.
“Exposure to such theories has been shown to undermine trust in democratic institutions (van Prooijen et al., 2022)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation§ Alternative News Media · p. 6
Alternative news media contribute to the spreading of conspiracy theories.
“While they do not always explicitly promote conspiracy theories, they do contribute to their spreading (Boberg et al., 2020), and attract users with higher levels of conspiracy mentality (Frischlich, Kuhfeldt, et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Boberg et al., 2020 source
- Findingown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 12
The co-occurrence graphs demonstrate the abundance and interconnectivity of the various conspiratorial interpretations of Epstein's death.
“In sum, the co-occurrence graphs vividly demonstrate the abundance and interconnectivity of the various conspiratorial interpretations of Epstein ' s death.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Co-occurrence of words in posts indicates semantic association or narrative linkage.
- Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 2
Especially on alternative platforms, skepticism swiftly transformed into unwarranted conspiracy theorizing.
“Especially on alternative platforms, this skepticism swiftly transformed into unwarranted conspiracy theorizing, partly bolstered by references to alternative news media sources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data§ Preliminary Analyses · p. 10
The largest share of posts originated from Twitter, followed by Reddit and 4Chan.
“The largest share of posts in our database originated from Twitter, followed by Reddit and 4Chan.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Abstract · p. 2
Unwarranted conspiracy theorizing on alternative platforms was partly bolstered by references to alternative news media sources.
“Especially on alternative platforms, this skepticism swiftly transformed into unwarranted conspiracy theorizing, partly bolstered by references to alternative news media sources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 11
Another sub-cluster of co-occurrences raised the involvement of one or multiple U.S. and international intelligence agencies in Epstein's death.
“Another sub-cluster of co-occurrences raises the involvement of one or multiple U.S. and international intelligence agencies in Epstein ' s death.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Discourse Dynamics · p. 10
Posting activity was similar across the four platforms.
“An examination of the number of posts per hour revealed a similarity in posting activity across these platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 12
Linked to the QAnon cluster were several references to a clandestine satanic cult believed to be accountable for Epstein's death.
“Linked to the QAnon cluster were several references to a clandestine satanic cult, believed to be accountable for Epstein ' s death.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 11
Posts in the Trump/Clinton cluster suggested that Epstein was silenced by one or both of these politicians.
“Posts within this cluster suggest that Epstein was silenced by one (or both) of these politicians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13
Overall, 40.99% of posts contain at least one URL.
“Overall, 40.99% post contain at least one URL.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 11
Hashtags #trumpBodyCount and #clintonBodyCount gained traction shortly after news of Epstein's death broke on Twitter and Gab.
“The hashtags #trumpBodyCount and #clintonBodyCount (and their variations) gained traction shortly after news of Epstein ' s death broke, both on Twitter and Gab.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 12
The share of unwarranted conspiracy theories shifted slightly over time: 36.00% before the official announcement on August 10, 38.00% on that day, and 28.00% in the aftermath.
“Before the official announcement of Epstein ' s death on August 10, 36.00% posts contained a reference to an unwarranted conspiracy theory, on that day itself, the amount was slightly higher (38.00%), and in the aftermath of the event, the amount decreased slightly (28.00%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The manually coded sample of n=300 posts is representative of the full dataset of Epstein-related posts.
- Rests on an assumption: The manual coding reliably distinguished unwarranted conspiracy theories from warranted skepticism.
- Rests on an assumption: The official announcement of Epstein's death on August 10 is the correct reference point for before/after analysis.
- Findingown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 12
On Gab, a sub-cluster centered on the QAnon conspiracy theory was evident.
“On Gab, a sub-cluster centered on the QAnon conspiracy theory was evident.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Discourse Dynamics · p. 11
The four platforms exhibited distinct patterns in the decay of the discussion.
“The four platforms exhibited distinct patterns in the decay of the discussion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 12
Overall, 34.00% of the manually coded n=300 posts contained an unwarranted conspiracy theory.
“The manual coding of n = 300 posts revealed, that, overall, 34.00% of the posts contained an unwarranted conspiracy theory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The manually coded sample of n=300 posts is representative of the full dataset of Epstein-related posts.
- Rests on an assumption: The manual coding reliably distinguished unwarranted conspiracy theories from warranted skepticism.
- Findingown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 11
The foremost sub-cluster of co-occurring words in the discourse revolved around alleged connections to Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, and Hillary Clinton.
“The foremost sub-cluster of cooccurring words revolves around the alleged connection to Donald Trump, Bill, and Hillary Clinton.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 11
Users linked Epstein's death to a multitude of different actors, often echoing the Pizzagate conspiracy theory.
“These co-occurrence graphs illuminate how users link Epstein ' s death to a multitude of different actors, often echoing the Pizzagate conspiracy theory.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation§ Discussion · p. 16
The most shared sources contained an equal amount of alternative and established media.
“However, the most shared sources contained an equal amount of alternative and established media, in line with prior work showing the centrality of alternative news media for conspiracytheories-endorsing online channels (Frischlich et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Frischlich et al., 2020 source
- Rests on an assumption: The classification of media domains as established or alternative is valid.
- Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 14
Users who did not share established media sources referenced the unwarranted conspiracy theory that Epstein was killed by a secret group of actors involved in a global human trafficking ring to hinder his testimony against them.
“Analyzing the two resulting co-occurrence graphs reveals that users who did not share established media sources referenced to the unwarranted conspiracy theory, that Epstein was killed by a secret group of actors involved in a global human trafficking ring to hinder his testimony against them”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Co-occurrence of words in posts indicates semantic association or narrative linkage.
- Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 15
Across all examined platforms, the dynamics of the discourse were similar, characterized by a sharp increase in content related to Epstein even before the first official announcement of the events by established news sources.
“Addressing RQ 1, we demonstrated that across all examined platforms, the dynamics of the discourse were similar, characterized by a sharp increase in content related to Epstein even before the first official announcement of the events by established news sources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13
Less than 0.1% of the URLs were shared more than 100 times.
“Less than 0.1% of the URLs were shared more than 100 times.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 15
Conspiracy theories emerged early and influenced the public discourse before established media sources had time to comment.
“In response to RQ 2, we demonstrated that conspiracy theories emerged early and influenced the public discourse before established media sources had time to comment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13
URLs linking to non-news outlets or private social media channels were almost completely missing from the most shared URLs.
“URLs linking to non-news outlets (e.g., blogs) or private social media channels were almost completely missing form the most shared URLs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation§ Discussion · p. 16
Links to established news sources were more frequent than those to alternative news sources across all platforms.
“Links to established news sources were more frequent than those to alternative news sources across all platforms, consistent with prior research on links shared in conspiracy-theories-endorsing online communities (Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2020 source
- Rests on an assumption: The classification of media domains as established or alternative is valid.
- Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13
Of the 48,069 unique URLs shared, almost three quarters (73.88%) were posted only once.
“Of the 48,069 unique URLs that had been shared, almost three quarter (73.88%) were posted only once.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13
Most URLs on 4Chan contained links to leaked documents relevant to Epstein's death, like his flight logs or court documents.
“Most URLs contained links to leaked documents relevant to Epstein ' s death, like his flight logs or court documents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 15
Users of alternative social media platforms tend to utilize more alternative news media outlets.
“Our data also confirms that users of alternative social media platforms tend to utilize more alternative news media outlets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The classification of media domains as established or alternative is valid.
- Rests on an assumption: The four platforms have distinct levels of alternativeness, with Twitter and Reddit as established and Gab and 4Chan as alternative.
- Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 16
Users who shared alternative news media were more likely to refer to unwarranted conspiracy theories than users who shared established news media.
“Users who shared alternative (vs. established) news media were more likely to refer to unwarranted conspiracy theories, indicating that alternative news media might play a role in the genesis of conspiracy theories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The classification of media domains as established or alternative is valid.
- Rests on an assumption: The four platforms have distinct levels of alternativeness, with Twitter and Reddit as established and Gab and 4Chan as alternative.
- Premisecitation§ Alternative News Media · p. 6
Alternative news media are shared frequently in social media communities that endorse conspiracy theories.
“This might explain why alternative news media are shared frequently in social media communities that endorse conspiracy theories (Frischlich et al., 2020; Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data§ Abstract · p. 2
Conspirational explanations thrive in low information environments.
“The present study shows how conspirational explanations thrive in low information environments and how alternative media plays a role in turning rational skepticism into unwarranted conspiracy theories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 3
Belief in conspiracies diminishes the inclination towards legitimate political engagement.
“the belief in conspiracies diminishes the inclination towards legitimate political engagement while fostering a greater tolerance for illegitimate and potentially violent political actions (Imhoff et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Imhoff et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation§ Alternative News Media · p. 6
Alternative news media attract users with higher levels of conspiracy mentality.
“While they do not always explicitly promote conspiracy theories, they do contribute to their spreading (Boberg et al., 2020), and attract users with higher levels of conspiracy mentality (Frischlich, Kuhfeldt, et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Frischlich, Kuhfeldt, et al., 2022 source
- Interpretationown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 13
The platform differences in unwarranted conspiracy theories point towards differences in the emergence of such content in alternative as compared to established social media spaces.
“pointing towards differences in the emergence of such content in alternative as compared to established social media spaces.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Abstract · p. 2
Alternative media plays a role in turning rational skepticism into unwarranted conspiracy theories.
“The present study shows how conspirational explanations thrive in low information environments and how alternative media plays a role in turning rational skepticism into unwarranted conspiracy theories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 3
Belief in conspiracies fosters a greater tolerance for illegitimate and potentially violent political actions.
“the belief in conspiracies diminishes the inclination towards legitimate political engagement while fostering a greater tolerance for illegitimate and potentially violent political actions (Imhoff et al., 2020).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Imhoff et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 16
Alternative news media might play a role in the genesis of conspiracy theories.
“indicating that alternative news media might play a role in the genesis of conspiracy theories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Conclusion · p. 16
The emergence and evolution of conspiracy theories are situated in the larger news system, with both established and alternative news media sites entangled with the discourse around pivotal events.
“Finally, we showed how this emergence and evolution are situated in the larger news system, with both established and alternative news media sites being entangled with the discourse around pivotal events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ Discussion · p. 15
More general conspiracy myths and established conspiracy theories provide the lens through which pivotal events can be immediately interpreted in a conspiracy-theoretical manner.
“but also implies that, just as conspiracy mentality represents the foil on which distinct conspiracy beliefs flourish (Imhoff et al., 2022), these more general conspiracy myths and established conspiracy theories provide the lens through which pivotal events can be immediately interpreted in a conspiracy-theoretical manner.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Imhoff et al., 2022 source
- Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 15
The speed of social media and the ready-to-build nature of conspiracy theories pose severe challenges to journalists that aim at providing an orienting function in times of uncertainty.
“This indicates too that the speed of social media and the ready-to-build nature of conspiracy theories pose severe challenges to journalists that aim at providing an orienting function in times of uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Conclusion · p. 16
This case study shows how alternative platforms and media outlets shape the public discourse on competing explanations for current events.
“As dealing with uncertainty and how citizens react to it is a key issue of current political communication, this case study shows how alternative platforms and media outlets shape the public discourse on competing explanation for current events.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13
4Chan users rely less on external sources in their discussion of current events.
“This shows that 4Chan users rely less on external sources in their discussion of current events”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13
The difference in URL sharing is mostly due to structural differences between microblog-style (Twitter and Gab) and forum-style (4Chan and Reddit) platforms.
“This is mostly due to the structural differences between the platforms ' microblog-style (Twitter and Gab) and the forum-style (4Chan and Reddit):”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 14
- May combine two claims. 27
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Individual and Societal Effects of Conspiracy Theories · p. 5The 5G-COVID-19 conspiracy theory emerged by merging two existing conspiracy theories: that the pandemic was deliberate and that 5G emissions have adverse health effects.
“More recently, Bruns et al. (2020) demonstrated that the conspiracy theory linking 5G to COVID-19 emerged by merging two existing conspiracy theories -one positing that the pandemic was a deliberate event and the other asserting that 5G emissions have adverse health effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites Bruns et al., 2020 source
The Discussion and conclusion describes the COVID-19/5G theory as a collision of longstanding beliefs about 5G’s supposed health dangers with the emerging coronavirus crisis. The Introduction mentions a separate theory that the virus was intentionally released, and Phase 2 describes an early story combining a possible bioweapon with 5G. Neither passage establishes that the theory emerged by merging two pre-existing theories, one of which held that the pandemic was deliberate. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Discourse Dynamics · p. 11The four platforms did not display significant differences in general posting patterns; all aligned with typical responses to news events.
“In addressing RQ 2, our sample of the four platforms did not display significant differences in general posting patterns, which all aligned with typical responses to news events.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 124Chan (56.00%) and Gab (42.67%) contained more unwarranted conspiracy theories than Twitter (22.67%) and Reddit (14.67%).
“Furthermore, 4Chan (56.00%) and Gab (42.67%) both contained more unwarranted conspiracy theories”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The manually coded sample of n=300 posts is representative of the full dataset of Epstein-related posts.
- Rests on an assumption: The manual coding reliably distinguished unwarranted conspiracy theories from warranted skepticism.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Discourse Dynamics · p. 11No platform exhibited significantly faster reactions to the event, although on 4chan the debate extended for a longer duration compared to the other platforms.
“In this initial quantitative analysis, no platform exhibited significantly faster reactions to the event, although on 4chan, the debate extended for a longer duration compared to the other platforms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ The Genesis of (Unwarranted) Conspiracy Theories · p. 12Antisemitic conspiracy theories accusing an alleged global Jewish conspiracy against the West of being responsible for Epstein's death were most notable on 4chan but also present on the other three platforms.
“Most notably on 4chan, but also present on the other three platforms, were antisemitic conspiracy theories, accusing an alleged global Jewish conspiracy against the West of being responsible for Epstein ' s death.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Preliminary Analyses · p. 10Average post lengths were: tweets M=150.02, SD=87.66; Reddit comments M=190.05, SD=374.20; Gab M=287.06, SD=353.07; 4Chan M=337.29, SD=405.12 characters.
“Onaverage, the posts were relatively short with tweets ( M =150.02, SD =87.66 characters) and Reddit comments ( M = 190.05, SD =374.20 characters) being even shorter than posts on Gab ( M = 287.06, SD = 353.07 characters) and 4Chan ( M = 337.29, SD = 405.12 characters).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Discourse Dynamics · p. 11On Twitter, the peak was more pronounced, accounting for 5.25% of all tweets, compared to Reddit 3.88%, Gab 3.60%, and 4chan 3.57%.
“On Twitter, the peak was more pronounced, accounting for a larger share of all tweets (5.25%), compared to the other platforms (Reddit: 3.88%, Gab: 3.60%, 4chan: 3.57%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13On 4Chan, users did share some URLs linking to established news outlets, but other news outlets, alternative and established alike, are mostly missing from the sample.
“The exception to this is 4Chan: While users on this platform did share some URLs linking to established news outlets (e.g., the first official news report confirming Epstein ' s death published by the New York Times), other news outlets, alternative and established alike, are mostly missing from out sample.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13The top 15 most shared outlets contained an equal amount of alternative and established media sources, with the larger outlets from both categories taking up most of the shares.
“The top 15 sources contained an equal amount of alternative and established media sources, with the larger outlets from both categories taking up most of the shares.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The classification of media domains as established or alternative is valid.
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13On Gab (74.28%) and Twitter (44.71%) the share of URLs was higher, whereas posts on 4Chan (12.98%) and Reddit (31.24%) used URLs less frequently.
“On Gab, (74.28%) and Twitter (44.71%) the share of URLs was higher, whereas posts on 4Chan (12.98%) and Reddit (31.24%) used URLs less frequently.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 15None of the platforms exhibited significantly faster reactions to the event, although the debate extended for a longer duration on 4Chan than on the other platforms.
“None of the platforms exhibited significantly faster reactions to the event, although the debate extended for a longer duration on 4 Chan than on the other platforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13On Gab, users shared fewer established media sources (52.81%) than alternative media sources (71.77%), and almost a quarter shared both (24.58%).
“On Gab on the other hand, users shared fewer established media sources (52.81%) than alternative media sources (71.77%) and almost a quarter shared both (24.58%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The classification of media domains as established or alternative is valid.
- Rests on an assumption: The four platforms have distinct levels of alternativeness, with Twitter and Reddit as established and Gab and 4Chan as alternative.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13On Twitter and Reddit, most users shared established media sources (Twitter: 74.64%, Reddit: 88.59%), and only a small share (<5%) shared both established and alternative media sources.
“On Twitter and Reddit, most users shared established media sources (Twitter: 74.64%, Reddit: 88.59%), and only a small share of users (< 5%) shared both established and alternative media sources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The classification of media domains as established or alternative is valid.
- Rests on an assumption: The four platforms have distinct levels of alternativeness, with Twitter and Reddit as established and Gab and 4Chan as alternative.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 15Users who shared established media sources tended to post like those who didn't share these sources at all, yet they were less likely to reference one of the most prominent unwarranted conspiracy theories found in the data.
“Answering RQ 3, users who shared established media sources tended to post like those who didn ' t share these sources at all, yet they were less likely to reference one of the most prominent unwarranted conspiracy theories found in the data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Co-occurrence of words in posts indicates semantic association or narrative linkage.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Discussion · p. 15Most posts were critical of the official representation of events, and over a third of all posts spread unwarranted conspiracy theories.
“Most posts were critical of the official representation of events, and over a third of all posts spread unwarranted conspiracy theories.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The manually coded sample of n=300 posts is representative of the full dataset of Epstein-related posts.
- Rests on an assumption: The manual coding reliably distinguished unwarranted conspiracy theories from warranted skepticism.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 13The most shared URLs led to established news media outlets reporting on Epstein's death (4.41%, n=13,162), although alternative news media outlets were also present (3.64%, n=10,860).
“Analyzing the most frequently shared URLs per platform revealed that the most shared URLs led to established news media outlets reporting on Epstein ' s death (4.41%, n = 13,162), although alternative news media outlets were also present (3.64%, n = 10,860).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The classification of media domains as established or alternative is valid.
May combine two claims.
Findingcitation§ Discussion · p. 15Conspiracy-theoretical interpretations were particularly prominent on alternative social media, with 4chan contributing heavily to the spread of antisemitic narratives, and Gab providing a home for QAnon-related discourses.
“Conspiracy-theoretical interpretations were particularly prominent on alternative social media, with 4chan contributing heavily to the spread of antisemitic narratives, and Gab providing a home for QAnon-related discourses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The four platforms have distinct levels of alternativeness, with Twitter and Reddit as established and Gab and 4Chan as alternative.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 134Chan users shared little from any news media source, except a New York Times article breaking the news of Epstein's death, but mainly shared direct sources used to support the formation of conspirational narratives, like flight logs.
“4Chan users shared little from any news media source (with the exception of a New York Times article breaking the news of Epstein ' s death), but mainly shared direct sources used to support the formation of conspirational narratives, like flight logs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The classification of media domains as established or alternative is valid.
- Rests on an assumption: The four platforms have distinct levels of alternativeness, with Twitter and Reddit as established and Gab and 4Chan as alternative.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 15While the corpus for users sharing established media sources contains around three times the number of posts than the alternative-source corpus, it is much more complex and less monothematic.
“While the corpus used to build the co-occurrence graph of users sharing established media sources contains around three times the number of posts than the one of users sharing alternative media sources, it is much more complex and less monothematic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Co-occurrence of words in posts indicates semantic association or narrative linkage.
May combine two claims.
Findingown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 15The mean number of connections between words is more than 10 times higher in the established-source graph, and the graph has a lower centrality than its counterpart.
“The mean number of connections between words is more than 10 times higher, and the graph also has a lower centrality than its counterpart”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Co-occurrence of words in posts indicates semantic association or narrative linkage.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Individual and Societal Effects of Conspiracy Theories · p. 5Conspiracy mentality tends to be relatively stable and normally distributed in society.
“While conspiracy mentality tends to be relatively stable and normally distributed in society, the belief in specific conspiracies is skewed and subject to change (Imhoff et al., 2022; Uscinski, Enders, et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Imhoff et al., 2022 source
- cites Uscinski, Enders, et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Introduction · p. 3In most conspiracy theories, the central actors of the narrative are politicians or political institutions, either as conspirators or enablers.
“Regarding their content, in most conspiracy theories, the central actors of the narrative are politicians or political institutions, either as the conspirators themselves or as the enablers of some nefarious plot, due to an assumed naivete or corrupt behavior.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Introduction · p. 3Conspiracy theories can be understood as a tool that enables the critique of established forms of knowledge (production).
“From a less normative perspective conspiracy theories can also be understood as a tool that enables the critique of established forms of knowledge (production).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ Individual and Societal Effects of Conspiracy Theories · p. 5Belief in specific conspiracies is skewed and subject to change.
“While conspiracy mentality tends to be relatively stable and normally distributed in society, the belief in specific conspiracies is skewed and subject to change (Imhoff et al., 2022; Uscinski, Enders, et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Imhoff et al., 2022 source
- cites Uscinski, Enders, et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown data§ Preprocessing · p. 10The study made all scripts and comprehensive details of preprocessing and analytical pipeline available through OSF.
“We have made available all scripts and comprehensive details of the preprocessing and analytical pipeline through the Open Science Framework (link removed for blinded peer-review).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 3Turning towards conspiracy theories seems to be motivated by societal crises and feelings of fear, uncertainty, and perceived lack of control.
“Turning towards conspiracy theories also seems to be motivated by societal crises and the feelings of fear, uncertainty, and a perceived lack of control.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Prooijen & Jostmann, 2013 source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ Alternative News Media · p. 6The availability of news coverage about a critical event could reduce the spread of conspiracy theories by reducing the need for sensemaking in the collective.
“In consequence, the availability of news coverage about a critical event could reduce the spread of conspiracy theories by reducing the need for sensemaking in the collective.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Individual and Societal Effects of Conspiracy Theories · p. 5Conspiracy theories can arise quickly after pivotal incidents.
“Bricker (2013) delved into the responses and subsequent surge in accusations of conspiracies directed at climate scientists following the leak of unlawfully obtained emails from a Climate Research Unit, illustrating how quickly conspiracy theories can arise after pivotal incidents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bricker, 2013 source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ Introduction · p. 3Conspiracy theories can be used as a form of propaganda or misinformation to spread uncertainty and distrust in societal institutions.
“They can be used as a form of propaganda or misinformation to spread uncertainty and distrust in societal institutions (van Prooijen et al., 2022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites van Prooijen et al., 2022
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ Introduction · p. 3There remains a dearth of knowledge concerning the origin and evolution of specific conspiracy theories across different platforms.
“Despite the accumulating evidence highlighting the corrosive impact of conspiracy beliefs, there remains a notable gap in our understanding of the genesis and evolution of specific conspiracy theories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Discussion · p. 15The findings align with the assumption that conspiracy theories flourish in times of uncertainty and serve as a form of collective sense making.
“Overall, our findings align with the assumption that conspiracy theories flourish in times of uncertainty (van Prooijen & Jostmann, 2013) and serve as a form of collective sense making (Kou et al., 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 15Specific conspiracy theories in the aftermath of a pivotal event seemed to build upon existing conspiracy myths (e.g., antisemitism), already circulating theories (e.g., Pizzagate), and thrive on animosities (e.g., towards political opponents).
“Like Lego bricks, specific conspiracy theories in the aftermath of a pivotal event seemed to build upon existing conspiracy myths (e.g., antisemitism), already circulating theories (e.g., Pizzagate), and thrive on animosities (e.g., towards political opponents).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Limitations and Future Research Directions · p. 16The study is a comparative case study of a single event, which limits the generalizability of its results.
“First, we present a comparative case study of a single event. Future research on other events needs to examine the stability of the observed dynamics to test the generalizability of our results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ Limitations and Future Research Directions · p. 16The mixed design of (semi-)automated and manual content analysis may not capture many intricacies of conspiracy theory practices (e.g., coded language).
“Second, to account for the sheer amount of data, we used a mixed design of (semi-)automated and manual content analysis. Many of the intricacies of conspiracy theory practices (e.g., the use of coded language) would benefit from a more extensive qualitative approach.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ Limitations and Future Research Directions · p. 16The evidence presented cannot be used to draw assumptions about individual users' beliefs or individual sharing motivations.
“Finally, the evidence presented in this study cannot be used to draw assumptions about individual users ' beliefs or individual sharing motivations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ Conclusion · p. 16Uncertainty can be a driver of a turn towards conspirational explanations, which in turn may erode trust in societal institutions.
“By understanding conspiracy theories as purposeful communication about politics (McNair, 2011), our study can illustrate how uncertainty can be a driver of a turn towards conspirational explanations, which in turn may erode trust in societal institutions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McNair, 2011 source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ Discussion · p. 15The findings are consistent with prior research showing that alternative social media and particularly fringe communities like 4Chan provide a welcoming environment for the spread of toxic content, likely due to their self-positioning as safe havens for such statements and their corresponding loose moderation rules.
“Thus, our findings are consistent with prior research showing that alternative social media and particularly fringe communities like 4Chan provide a welcoming environment for the spread of toxic content (Finkelstein et al., 2020; Rieger et al., 2021; Zannettou et al., 2018), likely due to their self-positioning as safe havens for such statements and their corresponding loose moderation rules (Fris”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Finkelstein et al., 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites Rieger et al., 2021 source
- cites Zannettou et al., 2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Rests on an assumption: The four platforms have distinct levels of alternativeness, with Twitter and Reddit as established and Gab and 4Chan as alternative.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Users ' Reliance on Established and Alternative News Media · p. 15The established-source graph indicates a thematically less centralized discussion that lacks a central narrative.
“hinting at a thematically less centralized discussion, that is, a discussion that lacks a central narrative.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ Limitations and Future Research Directions · p. 16The study did not analyze the content of the shared sources, so its distinction between established and alternative media sources does not consider the possibility of established news outlets spreading unwarranted conspiracy theories or alternative news sources confirming orthodox views.
“We also did not analyze the content of the shared sources. Our distinction of established and alternative media sources, representing the distinction between orthodox and heterodox interpretations of events, does not consider the possibility of established news outlets spreading unwarranted conspiracy theories, or alternative news sources confirming orthodox views”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The distinction between established and alternative media sources represents the distinction between orthodox and heterodox interpretations of events.
The paper relies on this without support.
The manually coded sample of n=300 posts is representative of the full dataset of Epstein-related posts.
“The manual coding of n = 300 posts revealed, that, overall, 34.00% of the posts contained an unwarranted conspiracy theory.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Co-occurrence of words in posts indicates semantic association or narrative linkage.
“we utilized cooccurrence graphs to construct a semantic network based on the content of the posts.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The classification of media domains as established or alternative is valid.
“We then used this list of established media sources to build a corpus of posts by users who shared an established media source and those who shared an alternative media source to be able to examine platform differences.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The four platforms have distinct levels of alternativeness, with Twitter and Reddit as established and Gab and 4Chan as alternative.
“four social media platforms with distinct levels of alternativeness (Twitter vs. Gab, Reddit vs. 4Chan)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The distinction between established and alternative media sources represents the distinction between orthodox and heterodox interpretations of events.
“Our distinction of established and alternative media sources, representing the distinction between orthodox and heterodox interpretations of events, does not consider the possibility of established news outlets spreading unwarranted conspiracy theories, or alternative news sources confirming orthodox views”
The paper relies on this without support.
The manual coding reliably distinguished unwarranted conspiracy theories from warranted skepticism.
“The manual coding of n = 300 posts revealed, that, overall, 34.00% of the posts contained an unwarranted conspiracy theory.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The official announcement of Epstein's death on August 10 is the correct reference point for before/after analysis.
“Before the official announcement of Epstein ' s death on August 10, 36.00% posts contained a reference to an unwarranted conspiracy theory”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As conspiracy theories can be amplified so quickly on social media, there is less time for authoritative sources to have published fact-checks.
“As conspiracy theories can be amplified so quickly on social media, there is less time for authoritative sources to have published fact-checks-our rationale for inclusion was to see if this would influence chatbot results (Burel et al., 2021; Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2024).”
From "Just Asking Questions": Doing Our Own Research on Conspiratorial Ideation by Generative AI Chatbots (2026) · cites this paper as Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2024
The Discussion (p. 15) says conspiracy theories emerged and influenced public discourse before established media had time to comment, and identifies the speed of social media as a challenge for journalists. It does not specifically examine whether authoritative sources had published fact-checks, so that part of the claim goes beyond the paper’s finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The results assign RQ1's question to RQ2
MinorThe stated RQ2 asks about differences between platforms; the question of when and how conspiratorial interpretations enter the discourse is RQ1.
“RQ 2 asked when and how conspiracy theories entered the discourse.”
“RQ1: When and how do conspirational interpretations of the event enter the discourse?”
The claimed top 15 sources are 13 and are not evenly split
MinorTable 2 lists 13 sources: seven classified as alternative and six as established. It therefore supports neither the stated count of 15 nor an equal number in each category.
“The top 15 sources contained an equal amount of alternative and established media sources”
“| thedailybeast.com | 547 | 0.18 | Established | Note . N = 298,221 posts.”
Epstein's death is dated both April and August 2019
MinorThe introduction places Epstein's death in April 2019, while the case description dates it to August 10, 2019.
“the sudden death of US financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in his cell in April 2019”
“Epstein, a well-connected US financier and convicted sex offender, was discovered deceased in his cell on August 10th, 2019, at 10:30 UTC”
Cites
The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., & Cichocka, A. (2017) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417718261 · Cited by 1,316 · cited 1× · see citing works
“So far, extensive research has explored the psychological correlates of conspiracy beliefs (for overviews, see Douglas et al., 2017; Uscinski, 2017; Uscinski et al., 2022a).”
Goertzel, T. (1994) · Political Psychology · doi:10.2307/3791630 · Cited by 1,094 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Within this context, a distinction can be made between peoples ’ general propensity to believe in various conspiracy theories, termed conspiracy mentality (Brotherton et al., 2013; Bruder et al., 2013) and their belief in speci fi c conspiracy theories (Goertzel, 1994).”
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Karahalios, K. G., Monroy‐Hernández, A., Lampinen, A., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2018) · Cited by 1,070 · see citing works
Bruder, M., Haffke, P., Neave, N., Nouripanah, N., & Imhoff, R. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225 · Cited by 1,049 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Within this context, a distinction can be made between peoples ’ general propensity to believe in various conspiracy theories, termed conspiracy mentality (Brotherton et al., 2013; Bruder et al., 2013) and their belief in speci fi c conspiracy theories (Goertzel, 1994).”
Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?
Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., de Vreese, C., Matthes, J., Hopmann, D., Salgado, S., Hubé, N., Stępińska, A., et al. (2017) · Annals of the International Communication Association · doi:10.1080/23808985.2017.1288551 · Cited by 974 · see citing works
Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: The Generic Conspiracist Beliefs Scale
Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279 · Cited by 950 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Within this context, a distinction can be made between peoples ’ general propensity to believe in various conspiracy theories, termed conspiracy mentality (Brotherton et al., 2013; Bruder et al., 2013) and their belief in speci fi c conspiracy theories (Goertzel, 1994).”
Debunking: A Meta-Analysis of the Psychological Efficacy of Messages Countering Misinformation
Chan, M.-P. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797617714579 · Cited by 898 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Addressing individuals with timely information about current events can help alleviate uncertainty (Chan et al., 2017; Wood, 2018), wherefore established or “ mainstream ” news media have a central orienting function in times of crises (Perse & Lambe, 2016).”
Applying LDA Topic Modeling in Communication Research: Toward a Valid and Reliable Methodology
Maier, D., Waldherr, A., Miltner, P., Wiedemann, G., Niekler, A., Keinert, A., Pfetsch, B., Heyer, G., Reber, U., Häußler, T., et al. (2018) · Communication Methods and Measures · doi:10.1080/19312458.2018.1430754 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Conspiracy theories as part of history: The role of societal crisis situations
van Prooijen, J.-W., & Douglas, K. M. (2017) · Memory Studies · doi:10.1177/1750698017701615 · Cited by 764 · cited 2× · see citing works
“While conspiracy theories have been a recurrent feature throughout human history (van Prooijen & Douglas, 2017), the advent of social media has profoundly ampli fi ed the possibility to spread, disseminate, and consume them (Zeng et al., 2022).”
Jolley, D., & Douglas, K. M. (2014) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12018 · Cited by 685 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Belief in conspiracy theories is linked to a reduced inclination towards behaviors that bene fi t the collective good, such as engaging in climate-friendly practices (Jolley & Douglas, 2014) or adhering to pandemic-control measures (Imhoff & Lamberty, 2020).”
An Introduction to Political Communication
McNair, B. (2011) · doi:10.4324/9780203828694 · Cited by 651 · see citing works
Science vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation
Bessi, A., Coletto, M., Davidescu, G. A., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118093 · Cited by 645 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…on all major social media platforms, including Facebook (Boberg et al., 2020), YouTube (R¨ochert et al., 2022), Instagram (Bloom & Moskalenko, 2021), and Reddit (Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2020), often fi nding fertile ground within specialized communities (Bessi et al., 2015; Stempel et al., 2007).”
Keeley, B. L. (1999) · The Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.2307/2564659 · Cited by 581 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Speci fi cally, our focus was on differentiating between warranted and unwarranted conspiracy theories as delineated by Keeley (1999).”
Imhoff, R., & Lamberty, P. (2020) · Social Psychology and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620934692 · Cited by 564 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Belief in conspiracy theories is linked to a reduced inclination towards behaviors that bene fi t the collective good, such as engaging in climate-friendly practices (Jolley & Douglas, 2014) or adhering to pandemic-control measures (Imhoff & Lamberty, 2020).”
Denny, M. J., & Spirling, A. (2017) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2017.44 · Cited by 502 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In (semi)-automated content analysis, preprocessing plays a crucial role and involves signi fi cant decisions made by the researcher (Denny & Spirling, 2018; Maier et al., 2018).”
Key Dimensions of Alternative News Media
Holt, K., Figenschou, T. U., & Frischlich, L. (2019) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2019.1625715 · Cited by 483 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Drawing from relational conceptualizations of alternative news media (Holt et al., 2019) and the heterodoxic nature of conspiracy theories (Anton et al., 2014), we understand alternative social media as those platforms that position themselves as counter-public spaces, against the perceived “…”
Self-citationA Culture of ConspiracyApocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America
Barkun, M. (2003) · doi:10.1525/california/9780520238053.001.0001 · Cited by 462 · see citing works
Belief in conspiracy theories: The influence of uncertainty and perceived morality
van Prooijen, J., & Jostmann, N. B. (2013) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.1922 · Cited by 403 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Overall, our fi ndings align with the assumption that conspiracy theories fl ourish in times of uncertainty (van Prooijen & Jostmann, 2013) and serve as a form of collective sense making (Kou et al., 2017).”
Conspiracy Theories and Their Societal Effects During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Pummerer, L., BOHM, R. M., Lilleholt, L., Winter, K., Zettler, I., & Sassenberg, K. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/19485506211000217 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
After the ‘APIcalypse’: social media platforms and their fight against critical scholarly research
Bruns, A. (2019) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1637447 · Cited by 319 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although it remains challenging to quantify the exact share of conspiracy theories due to the lack of independent access to social media data (Bruns, 2019), it is evident that the pressure on social media platforms to manage such content has increased over time for instance due to the European…”
Alternative Media as Critical Media
Fuchs, C. (2010) · European Journal of Social Theory · doi:10.1177/1368431010362294 · Cited by 305 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…questions established media ’ s (epistemic) authority and often rely on alternative production routines, such as those described for “ critical media ” (Fuchs, 2010), cite voices usually not heard in the mainstream, or publish alternative topics, or by employing diverging epistemologies, like…”
‘Corona? 5G? or both?’: the dynamics of COVID-19/5G conspiracy theories on Facebook
Bruns, A., Harrington, S., & Hurcombe, E. (2020) · Media International Australia · doi:10.1177/1329878x20946113 · Cited by 291 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…of the 5G conspiracy theory across Facebook, originating from “ obscure origins in pre-existing conspiracist groups, spreading to more diverse communities, and ultimately gaining substantial traction through endorsement by celebrities, sports fi gures, and media outlets ” (Bruns et al., 2020, p. 1).”
InfluentialSocial Media References in Newspapers
Paulussen, S., & Harder, R. A. (2014) · Journalism Practice · doi:10.1080/17512786.2014.894327 · Cited by 278 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Twitter is used by a sizable share of regular media users (22% of American adults use Twitter) (Wojcik & Hughes, 2019), but also policy makers, celebrities, activists, and journalists of traditional and new media organizations (Groshek & Tandoc, 2016; Paulussen & Harder, 2014).”
Do I Think BLS Data are BS? The Consequences of Conspiracy Theories
Einstein, K. L., & Glick, D. M. (2015) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-014-9287-z · Cited by 277 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Consuming them erodes trust in democratic institutions both immediately afterwards (Einstein & Glick, 2015; Kim & Cao, 2016) and over time (Pummerer et al., 2020).”
Hughes, S. W. A. A. (2019) · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Challenging Journalistic Authority
Figenschou, T. U., & Ihlebæk, K. A. (2018) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2018.1500868 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Popper Revisited, or What Is Wrong With Conspiracy Theories?
Pigden, C. R. (1995) · Philosophy of the Social Sciences · doi:10.1177/004839319502500101 · Cited by 227 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Thus, drawing from the early de fi nitory works of Keeley (1999) and Pigden (1995), we herein de fi ne conspiracy theories as: ... a heterodox explanatory pattern that attributes events and phenomena essentially to a group of people acting in secret (conspirators) who want to mislead the public and…”
Zannettou, S., Bradlyn, B., Cristofaro, E. D., Kwak, H., Sirivianos, M., Stringini, G., & Blackburn, J. (2018) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3184558.3191531 · Cited by 209 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…platforms, the two alternative social networks Gab and 4chan and their users have a history of spreading and endorsing conspiracy theories (see Tuters et al., 2018 for 4chan ’ s involvement in the “ Pizzagate ” conspiracy theory; and Zannettou et al., 2018 for Gab ’ s connection to the phenomenon).”
InfluentialImhoff, R., Dieterle, L., & Lamberty, P. (2021) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550619896491 · Cited by 208 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Belief in conspiracy theories is linked to a reduced inclination towards behaviors that bene fi t the collective good, such as engaging in climate-friendly practices (Jolley & Douglas, 2014) or adhering to pandemic-control measures (Imhoff & Lamberty, 2020).”
What is Gab? A Bastion of Free Speech or an Alt-Right Echo Chamber?
Zannettou, S., Bradlyn, B., Cristofaro, E. D., Kwak, H., Sirivianos, M., Stringhini, G., & Blackburn, J. (2018) · Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1802.05287 · Cited by 202 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…platforms, the two alternative social networks Gab and 4chan and their users have a history of spreading and endorsing conspiracy theories (see Tuters et al., 2018 for 4chan ’ s involvement in the “ Pizzagate ” conspiracy theory; and Zannettou et al., 2018 for Gab ’ s connection to the phenomenon).”
InfluentialBergmann, E. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90359-0 · Cited by 198 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this vein, they are also conceptually and practically closely related to populist politics (Bergmann, 2018; Jessen, 2019): They can serve to construct the populist understanding of a “ corrupt elite ” that is diametrically opposed to a homogenous “ will of the people.”
Media Use, Social Structure, and Belief in 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
Stempel, C., Hargrove, T., & Stempel, G. (2007) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769900708400210 · Cited by 195 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…on all major social media platforms, including Facebook (Boberg et al., 2020), YouTube (R¨ochert et al., 2022), Instagram (Bloom & Moskalenko, 2021), and Reddit (Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2020), often fi nding fertile ground within specialized communities (Bessi et al., 2015; Stempel et al., 2007).”
Suspicion of institutions: How distrust and conspiracy theories deteriorate social relationships
van Prooijen, J., Spadaro, G., & Wang, H. (2021) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.013 · Cited by 195 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Used both by citizens and by political actors (Schlipphak et al., 2022), conspiracy theories are also purposeful in multiple ways: They can be used as a form of pro-paganda or misinformation to spread uncertainty and distrust in societal institutions (van Prooijen et al., 2022).”
Imhoff, R., Bertlich, T., & Frenken, M. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101349 · Cited by 194 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…(Bruns et al., 2020, p. 1) but also implies that, just as conspiracy mentality represents the foil on which distinct conspiracy beliefs fl ourish (Imhoff et al., 2022), these more general conspiracy myths and established conspiracy theories provide the lens through which pivotal events can be…”
Have beliefs in conspiracy theories increased over time?
Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., Seelig, M. I., Drochon, H. H., Premaratne, K., & Murthi, M. N. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0270429 · Cited by 180 · cited 1× · see citing works
“So far, extensive research has explored the psychological correlates of conspiracy beliefs (for overviews, see Douglas et al., 2017; Uscinski, 2017; Uscinski et al., 2022a).”
When Inferring to a Conspiracy might be the Best Explanation
Dentith, M. R. X. (2016) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2016.1172362 · Cited by 146 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In its simplest form, conspiracy theories can be de fi ned semantically as “ theories about conspiracies, ” (Dentith, 2016, p. 8), where a theory is understood as an explanation or a mental model and a conspiracy as the secret plans of a group of actors (Keeley, 116).”
Tangherlini, T. R., Shahsavari, S., Shahbazi, B., Ebrahimzadeh, E., & Roychowdhury, V. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233879 · Cited by 146 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This application of semantic networks as an analytical tool has been previously employed in the realm of conspiracy theories, shedding light on the characteristics of conspiratorial narrative networks (Tangherlini et al., 2020).”
Propagating and Debunking Conspiracy Theories on Twitter During the 2015–2016 Zika Virus Outbreak
Wood, M. J. (2018) · Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0669 · Cited by 143 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Addressing individuals with timely information about current events can help alleviate uncertainty (Chan et al., 2017; Wood, 2018), wherefore established or “ mainstream ” news media have a central orienting function in times of crises (Perse & Lambe, 2016).”
Social Media and the Post-Truth World Order
Cosentino, G. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-43005-4 · Cited by 143 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The theory originated from a rumor related to Jeffrey Epstein ’ s legal case, speci fi cally referencing his so-called “ Lolita Express ” plane, which he purportedly used to transport his acquaintances and underage girls to his private Caribbean islands (Cosentino, 2020, p. 68).”
Boberg, S., Quandt, T., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Frischlich, L. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.02566 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationRottweiler, B., & Gill, P. (2020) · Terrorism and Political Violence · doi:10.1080/09546553.2020.1803288 · Cited by 132 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, conspiracy beliefs foster a greater tolerance for illegitimate political actions (Imhoff et al., 2020) and are associated with political extremism (Rottweiler & Gill, 2020).”
Conceptualizing “Dark Platforms”. Covid-19-Related Conspiracy Theories on 8kun and Gab
Zeng, J., & Schäfer, M. S. (2021) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1938165 · Cited by 110 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Previous research has indicated that conspiracy theories thrive on both types of platforms (Kou et al., 2017; Zeng & Sch¨afer, 2021) but fringe communities may host an even larger share of explicitly hostile content (Rieger et al., 2021).”
Perse, E. M., & Lambe, J. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203854693 · Cited by 108 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Addressing individuals with timely information about current events can help alleviate uncertainty (Chan et al., 2017; Wood, 2018), wherefore established or “ mainstream ” news media have a central orienting function in times of crises (Perse & Lambe, 2016).”
A Quantitative Approach to Understanding Online Antisemitism
Zannettou, S., Finkelstein, J., Bradlyn, B., & Blackburn, J. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7343 · Cited by 104 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…showing that alternative social media and particularly fringe communities like 4Chan provide a welcoming environment for the spread of toxic content (Finkelstein et al., 2020; Rieger et al., 2021; Zannettou et al., 2018), likely due to their self-positioning as safe havens for such statements and…”
Conspiracy Talk on Social Media: Collective Sensemaking during a Public Health Crisis
Kou, Y., Gui, X., Chen, Y., & Pine, K. (2017) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3134696 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Rieger, D., Kümpel, A. S., Wich, M., Kiening, T., & Groh, G. (2021) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051211052906 · Cited by 102 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Previous research has indicated that conspiracy theories thrive on both types of platforms (Kou et al., 2017; Zeng & Sch¨afer, 2021) but fringe communities may host an even larger share of explicitly hostile content (Rieger et al., 2021).”
Free Speech and Safe Spaces: How Moderation Policies Shape Online Discussion Spaces
Gibson, A. D. (2019) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305119832588 · Cited by 97 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Each subreddit has its own set of moderators, resulting in distinct communication norms between different subreddits (Gibson, 2019).”
Lyons, B. A., Mérola, V., & Reifler, J. (2018) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2018.1530526 · Cited by 72 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Furthermore, alternative news media often employ implicit cues (i.e., “ just asking, ” “ who might bene fi t ” ), which can illicit conspiracy believes among the audience (Lyons et al., 2019) and might increase uncertainty about unfolding events.”
BLINDED BY THE LIES? Toward an integrated definition of conspiracy theories
Baden, C., & Sharon, T. (2020) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtaa023 · Cited by 71 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Others focus their de fi nitions on the unrealistic assumptions about the conspirators ’ power (such as their absolute control over information fl ows), their corrupted epistemology, and on their Manichean worldview (Baden & Sharon, 2021).”
Bloom, M. M., & Moskalenko, S. (2021) · Stanford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781503630611 · Cited by 71 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…theories proliferate on all major social media platforms, including Facebook (Boberg et al., 2020), YouTube (R¨ochert et al., 2022), Instagram (Bloom & Moskalenko, 2021), and Reddit (Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2020), often fi nding fertile ground within specialized communities (Bessi et al.,…”
Journal of Technology Research
Baker, P. D. R. (2025) · Journal of Technology Research · doi:10.26629/jtr · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Conspiracy theories and their societal effects during the COVID-19 pandemic
Pummerer, L., Böhm, R., Lilleholt, L., Winter, K., Zettler, I., & Sassenberg, K. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/y5grn · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Dynamics of news events and social media reaction
Tsytsarau, M., Palpanas, T., & Castellanos, M. (2014) · ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/2623330.2623670 · Cited by 63 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Such posting behavior aligns with typical patterns observed in event-driven online discussions (Tsytsarau et al., 2014).”
Post-Truth Protest: How 4chan Cooked Up the Pizzagate Bullshit
Tuters, M., Jokubauskaitė, E., & Bach, D. (2018) · M/C Journal · doi:10.5204/mcj.1422 · Cited by 63 · cited 8× · see citing works
“4Chan is widely recognized for its role in propagating conspiracy theories like Pizzagate (Tuters et al., 2018).”
InfluentialCause and effect: On the antecedents and consequences of conspiracy theory beliefs
Uscinski, J. E., Enders, A. M., Klofstad, C., & Stoler, J. B. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101364 · Cited by 62 · cited 1× · see citing works
“So far, extensive research has explored the psychological correlates of conspiracy beliefs (for overviews, see Douglas et al., 2017; Uscinski, 2017; Uscinski et al., 2022a).”
Between Mainstream and Alternative – Co-orientation in Right-Wing Populist Alternative News Media
Frischlich, L., Klapproth, J., & Brinkschulte, F. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39627-5_12 · Cited by 57 · cited 2× · see citing works
“This might explain why alternative news media are shared frequently in social media communities that endorse conspiracy theories (Frischlich et al., 2020; Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2020).”
Self-citationThe affordance effect: Gatekeeping and (non)reciprocal journalism on Twitter
Groshek, J., & Tandoc, E. C. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.020 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
/pol/emics: Ambiguity, scales, and digital discourse on 4chan
Ludemann, D. (2018) · Discourse Context & Media · doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2018.01.010 · Cited by 45 · cited 1× · see citing works
“We exclusively extracted posts from/pol/, a board whose content “ deviate[s] fi rmly (and proudly) from the normal discursive emphasis of ‘ politically correct ’ understanding and inclusion ” (Ludemann, 2018, p. 2).”
Climategate: A Case Study in the Intersection of Facticity and Conspiracy Theory
Bricker, B. J. (2013) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2012.749294 · Cited by 44 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Bricker (2013) delved into the responses and subsequent surge in accusations of conspiracies directed at climate scientists following the leak of unlawfully obtained emails from a Climate Research Unit, illustrating how quickly conspiracy theories can arise after pivotal incidents.”
Alternative Counter-News Use and Fake News Recall During the COVID-19 Crisis
Frischlich, L., Kuhfeldt, L., Schatto-Eckrodt, T., & Clever, L. (2023) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2022.2106259 · Cited by 38 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…like 4Chan provide a welcoming environment for the spread of toxic content (Finkelstein et al., 2020; Rieger et al., 2021; Zannettou et al., 2018), likely due to their self-positioning as safe havens for such statements and their corresponding loose moderation rules (Frischlich et al., 2022b).”
InfluentialSelf-citationCaught in a networked collusion? Homogeneity in conspiracy-related discussion networks on YouTube
Röchert, D., Neubaum, G., Roß, B., & Stieglitz, S. (2021) · Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.is.2021.101866 · Cited by 33 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Conspiracy theories proliferate on all major social media platforms, including Facebook (Boberg et al., 2020), YouTube (R¨ochert et al., 2022), Instagram (Bloom & Moskalenko, 2021), and Reddit (Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2020), often fi nding fertile ground within specialized communities (Bessi et al.,…”
Environmental users abandoned Twitter after Musk takeover
Chang, C. H., Deshmukh, N. R., Armsworth, P. R., & Masuda, Y. J. (2023) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2023.07.002 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Although the platform experienced a decline in user engagement following the takeover by Elon Musk (Chang et al., 2023), as of September 19, 2023, the website maintained a global ranking of 5 (similarweb.com).”
Anton, A., Schetsche, M. T., & Walter, M. K. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-19324-3_1 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Conspiracy theories in digital environments: Moving the research field forward
Zeng, J., Schäfer, M. S., & Oliveira, T. M. (2022) · Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies · doi:10.1177/13548565221117474 · Cited by 21 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While conspiracy theories have been a recurrent feature throughout human history (van Prooijen & Douglas, 2017), the advent of social media has profoundly ampli fi ed the possibility to spread, disseminate, and consume them (Zeng et al., 2022).”
Conspiracy Theory Beliefs and Political Trust: The Moderating Role of Political Communication
Schlipphak, B., Isani, M., & Back, M. (2022) · Politics and Governance · doi:10.17645/pag.v10i4.5755 · Cited by 17 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Used both by citizens and by political actors (Schlipphak et al., 2022), conspiracy theories are also purposeful in multiple ways: They can be used as a form of pro-paganda or misinformation to spread uncertainty and distrust in societal institutions (van Prooijen et al., 2022).”
Populism and Conspiracy: A Historical Synthesis of American Countersubversive Narratives
Jessen, N. (2019) · American Journal of Economics and Sociology · doi:10.1111/ajes.12275 · Cited by 14 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In this vein, they are also conceptually and practically closely related to populist politics (Bergmann, 2018; Jessen, 2019): They can serve to construct the populist understanding of a “ corrupt elite ” that is diametrically opposed to a homogenous “ will of the people.”
Papasavva, A., Blackburn, J., Stringhini, G., Zannettou, S., & Cristofaro, E. D. (2020) · MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Groshek, J., & Tandoc, E. C. (2016) · International Conference on Social Media and Society (SMSociety) · doi:10.1145/2930971.2930993 · Cited by 10 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Twitter is used by a sizable share of regular media users (22% of American adults use Twitter) (Wojcik & Hughes, 2019), but also policy makers, celebrities, activists, and journalists of traditional and new media organizations (Groshek & Tandoc, 2016; Paulussen & Harder, 2014).”
Use and Assessment of Sources in Conspiracy Theorists’ Communities
Schatto-Eckrodt, T., Boberg, S., Wintterlin, F., & Quandt, T. (2020) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-39627-5_3 · Cited by 8 · cited 4× · see citing works
“This might explain why alternative news media are shared frequently in social media communities that endorse conspiracy theories (Frischlich et al., 2020; Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2020).”
InfluentialSelf-citationYablokov, I., Girard, P., Blanuša, N., et al. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429452734-5_0 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Tackling “conspiracy” theories after the January 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris
Kreis, E. (2015) · Diogenes · doi:10.1177/0392192120924537 · Cited by 1 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Kreis (2020) scrutinized conspiracy theories that emerged in the aftermath of the terrorist attack on the French newspaper Charlie Hebdo in January 2015, revealing that the label “ conspiracy theory ” was employed in a broad sense and not always devoid of ideological presuppositions (p. 38).”
Barbero (2014) · doi:10.1016/j · Cited by 1 · see citing works
"Is it a Qoincidence?": An Exploratory Study of QAnon on Voat
Papasavva, A., Blackburn, J., Stringhini, G., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.04885
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Barkun M., 2014, Culture of conspiracy: Apocalyptic visions in contemporary America
- Dentith M. R. X., 2019, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 8, 1
- Ellis E. G., 2019, Wired
- Frischlich L., 2022, Forschungspapier, 3, 1
- Kim M., 2016, International Journal of Communication, 10, 3808
- Nocun K., 2020, Fake facts: Wie verschwörungstheorien unser denken bestimmen (Originalausgabe)
- Phillips W. M., 2012, This is why we can’t have nice things: The origins, evolution and cultural embeddedness of online trolling [Ph.D.]
- Rashbaum W. K., 2019, The New York Times
- Sisak M. R., 2019, Medical examiner rules Epstein death a suicide by hanging
- Smith A., 2013, Pew Research Center
- Uscinski J. E., 2017, Argumenta, 3, 233
- Wagner-Egger P., 2019, Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective, 8, 50
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Buehling, K., Zhang, X., & Heft, A. (2025) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448251315756 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“…drawing public attention and thus amplifying conspiracy theories (Bruns et al., 2022; Phillips, 2018), as alternative and legacy news sources are a common reference point for conspiracist claim-making in far-right information ecosystems (Buehling and Heft, 2023; Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2024).”
Frisli, S. (2025) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-025-00367-x · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The digital public sphere is becoming increasingly fragmented, where established news media find themselves sharing the digital space with alternative news sites that challenge the legitimacy of established news outlets [46, 47].”
Social influence and network structure: How conspiracy theories spread on social media
Matuszewski, P., & Rams-Ługowski, M. (2025) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103282 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
"Just Asking Questions": Doing Our Own Research on Conspiratorial Ideation by Generative AI Chatbots
FitzGerald, K. M., Riedlinger, M., Bruns, A., Harrington, S., Graham, T., & Angus, D. (2026) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.11337 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…social media users that Donald Trump staged his own assassination attempt in July 2024 (Donald Trump assassination conspiracy theory); 9. and finally, the idea that Donald Trump or his close advisors including Elon Musk rigged the 2024 election in his favour (2024 US election conspiracy theory).”
Conspiracy Theorists as Alternative Journalists
Maeyer, J. D., & Cam, F. L. (2025) · Journalism Studies · doi:10.1080/1461670x.2025.2536767 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“…that are strongly positioned as an “episte-mic corrective” to mainstream media (Harambam 2023) and that play a role in spreading disinformation and unwarranted conspiracy theories, especially in conjunction with alternative social media platforms (Schatto-Eckrodt, Clever, and Frischlich 2024).”
Robert, I. D., & Frank, M. C. (2026) · Al-Biruni Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.64440/biruni/bir0018 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“This facilitates the analysis of how the Epstein case is used in the political and communication rivalries [44].”
Rantasila, A., Jönsson, A. M., & Roslyng, M. M. (2025) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003479550-16
Jönsson, A. M., Roslyng, M. M., & Rantasila, A. (2025) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003479550-1
Utz, S., Pummerer, L., & Sassenberg, K. (2025) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2025.2600449
“Since conspiracy theories are often spread via media, especially alternative media (Boberg et al., 2020; Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2024), this is a first hint that these two fears might differentially predict media use as well.”
Maeyer, J. D., Séjourné, C., & Champagne, C. (2026) · Journal for Cultural Research · doi:10.1080/14797585.2026.2643821
“…their role in possibly contributing to the spread of disinformation, particularly when operating alongside alternative social media platforms (Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2024), scholars have emphasised that conspiracy media can play a role in fostering a more pluralistic media environment…”
Arlt, D., & Schumann, C. (2026) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2026.1782842
Yaochu, S. G., Zidong, S. L., & Pauli, G. (2026) · Al-Biruni Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.64440/biruni/bir0024
Leave the world(view) behind, but keep the words: The effect of conspiracism on writing
Miani, A., Adornetti, I., Altavilla, D., Deriu, V., Chiera, A., & Ferretti, F. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0346496
“Initial ideas may gradually develop into elaborated narratives through repeated social interactions among multiple individuals over time [59,62,189,190].”
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0009
Topic Modeling and Word Embedding
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.005.0001
Linguistic Patterns in Online Conspiracy Theory
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0001
Opportunities for Future Research
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0010
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0005
From Mindsets and Algorithms to a Cultural Toolkit
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0004
Why Do Online Conspiracy Theories Matter?
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0002
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.002.0001
Online Conspiracy Theorizing as Conversational Coordination
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0008
Fake News, Rumors, Folk Theories
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0003
Online Conspiracy Rabbit Hole as a Semantic Cascade
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0006
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.002.0006
How We Studied Conspiracy Theories
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.005.0002
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.002.0007
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.001.0001
Linguistic Signature of Superspreaders
Rao, H., & Greve, H. R. (2026) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780197772324.003.0007
Metag, J., & Wintterlin, F. (2026) · Communications · doi:10.1515/commun-2026-0021
“Such alternative media, which position themselves in opposition to so-called mainstream media, have been found to spread conspiracy theories to a significant degree (Schatto-Eckrodt et al., 2024; Zeng and Schäfer, 2021).”
Alternative Social Platforms as Opportunity Structures for Alternative News
Frischlich, L., & Schulze, H. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22489-7_18
Self-citationAccessing and Assessing the Content of Alternative Media
Müller, P. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-22489-7_13
- Authors
- Schatto-Eckrodt, T., Clever, L., & Frischlich, L.
- Affiliations
- Department of Communication and Journalism, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- University of Münster (DE)
- University of Southern Denmark (DK)
- Venue
- Social Science Computer Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2024-04-14
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1160-1180
- ISSN
- 0894-4393 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-8286
- OpenAlex
- W4394797912
- Semantic Scholar
- 1292d80235c60fb7512bab3f21ee5a93c46de730
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 23.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Social Science Computer Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Funders
- Digital Society research program funded by the Ministry of Culture and Science of the German State of North Rhine-Westphalia (005-1709-001)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Keywords
- conspiracy theories, Jeffrey Epstein, alternative social media, alternative press, Gab, 4chan, Twitter, Reddit, trust in democratic institutions, democratic participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-19.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-19.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review