The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Co-Simulation: A Survey
Abstract
Modeling and simulation techniques are today extensively used both in industry and science. Parts of larger systems are, however, typically modeled and simulated by different techniques, tools, and algorithms. In addition, experts from different disciplines use various modeling and simulation techniques. Both these facts make it difficult to study coupled heterogeneous systems. Co-simulation is an emerging enabling technique, where global simulation of a coupled system can be achieved by composing the simulations of its parts. Due to its potential and interdisciplinary nature, co-simulation is being studied in different disciplines but with limited sharing of findings. In this survey, we study and survey the state-of-the-art techniques for co-simulation, with the goal of enhancing future research and highlighting the main challenges. To study this broad topic, we start by focusing on discrete-event-based co-simulation, followed by continuous-time-based co-simulation. Finally, we explore the interactions between these two paradigms, in hybrid co-simulation. To survey the current techniques, tools, and research challenges, we systematically classify recently published research literature on co-simulation, and summarize it into a taxonomy. As a result, we identify the need for finding generic approaches for modular, stable, and accurate coupling of simulation units, as well as expressing the adaptations required to ensure that the coupling is correct.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems
Kalman, R. E. (1960) · Journal of Basic Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.3662552 · Cited by 31,751
Time, clocks, and the ordering of events in a distributed system
Lamport, L. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359545.359563 · Cited by 8,488
The Principles of Quantum Mechanics
Dirac, P. A. M., & Polkinghorne, J. C. (1958) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3062610 · Cited by 5,409
Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study
Kang, K. C., Cohen, S. G., Hess, J. A., Novak, W. E., & Peterson, A. S. (1990) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · doi:10.21236/ada235785 · Cited by 4,282
Solving ordinary differential equations I. nonstiff problems
(1987) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/0378-4754(87)90083-8 · Cited by 4,077
Cyber Physical Systems: Design Challenges
Lee, E. A. (2008) · 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing (ISORC) · doi:10.1109/isorc.2008.25 · Cited by 3,525
Theory of Modeling and Simulation
(2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2016-0-03987-6 · Cited by 2,914
The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles
Glaessgen, E., & Stargel, D. (2012) · 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA · doi:10.2514/6.2012-1818 · Cited by 2,404
Jefferson, D. R. (1985) · ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems · doi:10.1145/3916.3988 · Cited by 2,397
The algorithmic analysis of hybrid systems
Alur, R., Courcoubetis, C., Halbwachs, N., Henzinger, T. A., Ho, P.-H., Nicollin, X., Olivero, A., Sifakis, J., & Yovine, S. (1995) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/0304-3975(94)00202-t · Cited by 1,876
Metadata
- Authors
- Gomes, C., Thule, C., Broman, D., Larsen, P. G., & Vangheluwe, H.
- Venue
- ACM Computing Surveys
- Published
- 2018-05-23
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-33
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7341
- OpenAlex
- W2804347281
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 25.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Co-Simulation: A Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3179993
- The paper
- Gomes, C., Thule, C., Broman, D., Larsen, P. G., & Vangheluwe, H. (2019). Co-Simulation: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys. https://doi.org/10.1145/3179993
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.