Cited by 99Computability, Logic, AI Algorithmssemigroups and automata theoryLogic, programming, and type systems

On the Simplicity and Speed of Programs for Computing Infinite Sets of Natural Numbers

Open access
Chaitin, Gregory J.·1969·Journal of the ACM

Abstract

It is suggested that there are infinite computable sets of natural numbers with the property that no infinite subset can be computed more simply or more quickly than the whole set. Attempts to establish this without restricting in any way the computer involved in the calculations are not entirely successful. A hypothesis concerning the computer makes it possible to exhibit sets without simpler subsets. A second and analogous hypothesis then makes it possible to prove that these sets are also without subsets which can be computed more rapidly than the whole set. It is then demonstrated that there are computers which satisfy both hypotheses. The general theory is momentarily set aside and a particular Turing machine is studied. Lastly, it is shown that the second hypothesis is more restrictive then requiring the computer to be capable of calculating all infinite computable sets of natural numbers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/321526.321530

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Kolmogorov complexity is in general uncomputable and therefore of limited practical interest.

    “Kolmogorov complexity is in general uncomputable, and, therefore, of limited practical interest.”

    From Meta-learned models of cognition (2024) · cites this paper as Chaitin, 1969

    The Remark discusses a program-complexity measure, and Section 3 discusses computational complexity in number theory. Neither passage says that Kolmogorov complexity is generally uncomputable or concludes that it is therefore of limited practical interest. Searches for uncomputability and practical usefulness found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.70)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. HARDY, G. H., AND WRIGHT, E.M. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1962.
  2. BLV~, M. Measures on the computation speed of partial recursive functions. Quart. Prog. Rep. 72, Res. Lab. Electronics, MIT, Cambridge, Mass., Jan. 1964, pp. 237-253.
  3. ARBIB, M. A. Speed-up theorems and incompleteness theorems. In Automata Theory, E. R. Cainiello (Ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1966, pp. 6-24.
  4. HARDY, G. H. Orders of Infinity. Cambridge Math. Tracts, No. 12, U. of Cambridge, Cambridge, Eng., 1924.
  5. BIRKHOFF, G. Lattice Theory. Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. Vol. 25, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R. I., 1967.
  6. CHAITIN, G.J. A lattice of computer speeds. Abstract 67T-397, Notices Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (1967), 538.
  7. MOSTOWSKI, A. ~ber gewisse universelle Relationen. Ann. Soc. Polon. Math. 17 (1938), 117-118.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chaitin, G. J.
Affiliations
Mario Bravo 249, Buenos Aires, Argentina and Buenos Aires, Argentina
Corresponding author
Chaitin, Gregory J.
Venue
Journal of the ACM
Published
1969-07
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
407-422
ISSN
  • 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-735X
OpenAlex
W1977165845
Cited by
99
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of the ACM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › semigroups and automata theory
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, programming, and type systems
Keywords
natural numbers, computational complexity, Turing machines, computable sets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review