The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hyperparameter Importance Across Datasets
Open accessAbstract
With the advent of automated machine learning, automated hyperparameter optimization methods are by now routinely used in data mining. However, this progress is not yet matched by equal progress on automatic analyses that yield information beyond performance-optimizing hyperparameter settings. In this work, we aim to answer the following two questions: Given an algorithm, what are generally its most important hyperparameters, and what are typically good values for these? We present methodology and a framework to answer these questions based on meta-learning across many datasets. We apply this methodology using the experimental meta-data available on OpenML to determine the most important hyperparameters of support vector machines, random forests and Adaboost, and to infer priors for all their hyperparameters. The results, obtained fully automatically, provide a quantitative basis to focus efforts in both manual algorithm design and in automated hyperparameter optimization. The conducted experiments confirm that the hyperparameters selected by the proposed method are indeed the most important ones and that the obtained priors also lead to statistically significant improvements in hyperparameter optimization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
(2011) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/1953048.2078195 · Cited by 8,539
Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions
Jones, D. R., Schonlau, M., & Welch, W. J. (1998) · Journal of Global Optimization · doi:10.1023/a:1008306431147 · Cited by 8,070
Hansen, L. K., & Salamon, P. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.58871 · Cited by 4,260
Sequential Model-Based Optimization for General Algorithm Configuration
Hutter, F., Hoos, H. H., & Leyton-Brown, K. (2011) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-25566-3_40 · Cited by 2,469
Self-citation
Cited by
Hyperparameters and tuning strategies for random forest
Probst, P., Wright, M. N., & Boulesteix, A. (2019) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1301 · Cited by 1,640
Hyperparameter optimization: Foundations, algorithms, best practices, and open challenges
Bischl, B., Binder, M., Lang, M., Pielok, T., Richter, J., Coors, S., Thomas, J., Ullmann, T., Becker, M., Boulesteix, A., et al. (2023) · WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1002/widm.1484 · Cited by 930
Benchmark and Survey of Automated Machine Learning Frameworks
Zöller, M.-A., & Huber, M. F. (2021) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.11854 · Cited by 448
Vanschoren, J. (2019) · The Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-05318-5_2 · Cited by 328
Predicting Quality Measure Completion Among 14 Million Low‐Income Patients Enrolled in Medicaid
Patel, S. Y., Barnett, M. L., & Basu, S. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01797-7 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- van Rijn, J. N., & Hutter, F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-07-19
- Pages
- 2367-2376
- OpenAlex
- W2766412091
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.51
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperparameter Importance Across Datasets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3219819.3220058
- The paper
- van Rijn, J. N., & Hutter, F. (2018). Hyperparameter Importance Across Datasets. Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219819.3220058
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.