The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Users are not the enemy
Open accessAbstract
In this article, the author discusses why users compromise computer security mechanisms and how to take remedial measures. Confidentiality is an important aspect of computer security. It depends on authentication mechanisms, such as passwords, to safeguard access to information. Traditionally, authentication procedures are divided into two stages: identification and secret password. To date, research on password security and the usability of these mechanisms has rarely been investigated. Since security mechanisms are designed, implemented, applied and breached by people, human factors should be considered in their design. It seems that currently, hackers pay more attention to the human link in the security chain than security designers do, by using social engineering techniques to obtain passwords. The key element in password security is the crackablity of a password combination. System-generated passwords are essentially the optimal security approach; user-generated passwords are potentially more memorable and thus less likely to be disclosed. Password composition, alphanumeric password is more secure than one composed of letters alone. INSET: Recommendations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Quest to Replace Passwords: A Framework for Comparative Evaluation of Web Authentication Schemes
Bonneau, J., Herley, C., Oorschot, P. C. V., & Stajano, F. (2012) · 2012 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy · doi:10.1109/sp.2012.44 · Cited by 1,110
A large-scale study of web password habits
Florencio, D., & Herley, C. (2007) · Proceedings of the 16th international conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/1242572.1242661 · Cited by 1,047
So long, and no thanks for the externalities: the rational rejection of security advice by users
Herley, C. (2009) · Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on New security paradigms workshop · doi:10.1145/1719030.1719050 · Cited by 524
Are Passfaces More Usable Than Passwords? A Field Trial Investigation
Brostoff, S., & Sasse, M. A. (2000) · People and Computers XIV — Usability or Else! · doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0515-2_27 · Cited by 411
Self-citationDesign and evaluation of a shoulder-surfing resistant graphical password scheme
Wiedenbeck, S., Waters, J., Sobrado, L., & Birget, J.-C. (2006) · Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces - AVI '06 · doi:10.1145/1133265.1133303 · Cited by 382
Metadata
- Authors
- Adams, A., & Sasse, M. A.
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 40-46
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W2037202491
- Cited by
- 1,401
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Users are not the enemy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/322796.322806
- The paper
- Adams, A., & Sasse, M. A. (1999). Users are not the enemy. Communications of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/322796.322806
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.