The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interactive Intent Modeling for Exploratory Search
Abstract
Exploratory search requires the system to assist the user in comprehending the information space and expressing evolving search intents for iterative exploration and retrieval of information. We introduce interactive intent modeling, a technique that models a user’s evolving search intents and visualizes them as keywords for interaction. The user can provide feedback on the keywords, from which the system learns and visualizes an improved intent estimate and retrieves information. We report experiments comparing variants of a system implementing interactive intent modeling to a control system. Data comprising search logs, interaction logs, essay answers, and questionnaires indicate significant improvements in task performance, information retrieval performance over the session, information comprehension performance, and user experience. The improvements in retrieval effectiveness can be attributed to the intent modeling and the effect on users’ task performance, breadth of information comprehension, and user experience are shown to be dependent on a richer visualization. Our results demonstrate the utility of combining interactive modeling of search intentions with interactive visualization of the models that can benefit both directing the exploratory search process and making sense of the information space. Our findings can help design personalized systems that support exploratory information seeking and discovery of novel information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale
(1996) · Usability Evaluation In Industry · doi:10.1201/9781498710411-35 · Cited by 8,989
Introduction to Reinforcement Learning
Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998) · The MIT Press eBooks · Cited by 6,855
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
A STATISTICAL INTERPRETATION OF TERM SPECIFICITY AND ITS APPLICATION IN RETRIEVAL
SPARCK JONES, K. (1972) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eb026526 · Cited by 4,505
Monsell, S. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00028-7 · Cited by 2,984
Relevance feedback in information retrieval
Rocchio, J. J. (1971) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,680
A Language Modeling Approach to Information Retrieval
Ponte, J. M., & Croft, W. B. (2017) · ACM SIGIR Forum · doi:10.1145/3130348.3130368 · Cited by 2,503
A language modeling approach to information retrieval
Ponte, J. M., & Croft, W. B. (1998) · Proceedings of the 21st annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/290941.291008 · Cited by 1,821
The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface
Bates, M. J. (1989) · Online Review · doi:10.1108/eb024320 · Cited by 1,757
Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction
(1998) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k.1998.27.9.1093.3 · Cited by 1,562
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Omar Alonso , Ricardo Baeza-Yates , and Michael Gertz . 2007 . Exploratory search using timelines . In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI 2007 Workshop on Exploratory Search and HCI. ACM , New York, NY, 23--26. Omar Alonso, Ricardo Baeza-Yates, and Michael Gertz. 2007. Exploratory search using timelines. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI 2007 Workshop on Exploratory Search and HCI. ACM, New York, NY, 23--26.
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198611)37:6<357::AID-ASI1>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
- N. J. Belkin . 1980 . Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval . Can. J. Info. Sci. 5 (1980), 133 -- 143 . N. J. Belkin. 1980. Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Can. J. Info. Sci. 5 (1980), 133--143.
- 10.1145/1772690.1772714 · DOI
- 10.5555/580582.857725 · doi:10.5555/580582.857725
- 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.643 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5555/3017447.3017495 · doi:10.5555/3017447.3017495
- 10.5555/2655780.2655819 · doi:10.5555/2655780.2655819
- 10.1145/1466620.1466622 · DOI
- 10.1145/2449396.2449442 · DOI
Cited by
Interactive IR User Study Design, Evaluation, and Reporting
Liu, J., & Shah, C. (2019) · Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-02319-4 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruotsalo, T., Peltonen, J., Eugster, M. J. A., Głowacka, D., Floréen, P., Myllymäki, P., Jacucci, G., & Kaski, S.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Information Systems
- Published
- 2018-10-03
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-46
- ISSN
- 1046-8188
- 1558-2868
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 130
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Tekes (Re:Know and D2I)
- Seventh Framework Programme (611570)
- Academy of Finland (278090)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interactive Intent Modeling for Exploratory Search. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3231593
- The paper
- Ruotsalo, T., Peltonen, J., Eugster, M. J. A., Głowacka, D., Floréen, P., Myllymäki, P., Jacucci, G., & Kaski, S. (2018). Interactive Intent Modeling for Exploratory Search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3231593
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.