The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Addressing two problems in deep knowledge tracing via prediction-consistent regularization
Open accessAbstract
Knowledge tracing is one of the key research areas for empowering personalized education. It is a task to model students' mastery level of a knowledge component (KC) based on their historical learning trajectories. In recent years, a recurrent neural network model called deep knowledge tracing (DKT) has been proposed to handle the knowledge tracing task and literature has shown that DKT generally outperforms traditional methods. However, through our extensive experimentation, we have noticed two major problems in the DKT model. The first problem is that the model fails to reconstruct the observed input. As a result, even when a student performs well on a KC, the prediction of that KC's mastery level decreases instead, and vice versa. Second, the predicted performance for KCs across time-steps is not consistent. This is undesirable and unreasonable because student's performance is expected to transit gradually over time. To address these problems, we introduce regularization terms that correspond to reconstruction and waviness to the loss function of the original DKT model to enhance the consistency in prediction. Experiments show that the regularized loss function effectively alleviates the two problems without degrading the original task of DKT.1
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge
Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1995) · User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/bf01099821 · Cited by 2,324
“Learning factors analysis-a general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement,”
Cen, H., Koedinger, K., & Junker, B. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11774303_17 · Cited by 572
Cited by
Deep learning goes to school: toward a relational understanding of AI in education
Perrotta, C., & Selwyn, N. (2020) · Learning, Media and Technology · doi:10.1080/17439884.2020.1686017 · Cited by 299
A Systematic Review of Deep Learning Approaches to Educational Data Mining
Hernández-Blanco, A., Herrera-Flores, B., Tomás, D., & Navarro-Colorado, B. (2019) · Complexity · doi:10.1155/2019/1306039 · Cited by 230
A self-attentive model for knowledge tracing
Pandey, S., & Karypis, G. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.06837
Metadata
- Authors
- Yeung, C.-K., & Yeung, D.-Y.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Conference on Learning at Scale
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-06-26
- Pages
- 1-10
- OpenAlex
- W2805035427
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.