Cited by 572Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningVisual and Cognitive Learning ProcessesInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

“Learning factors analysis-a general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement,”

Cen, Hao, Koedinger, Kenneth, Junker, Brian·2006·Lecture notes in computer science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/11774303_17

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional approaches for cognitive modeling in knowledge tracing include factor analysis methods which estimate student knowledge by learning a function (logistic in most cases) based on various factors related to the students, course materials, learning and forgetting behavior.

    “Traditional approaches for cognitive modeling include factor analysis methods which estimate student knowledge by learning a function (logistic in most cases) based on various factors related to the students, course materials, learning and forgetting behavior, etc. (Pavlik and Anderson, 2005; Cen et al., 2006; Pavlik et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cen, H., Koedinger, K., & Junker, B.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Venue
Lecture notes in computer science
Published
2006
Pages
164-175
ISSN
  • 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
  • 1611-3349
OpenAlex
W1562092080
Cited by
572
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
FWCI
6.95
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Lecture notes in computer science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
intelligent tutoring systems, production rules, model improvement, combinatorial search, statistical models, human expertise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review