The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scheduling multithreaded computations by work stealing
Abstract
This paper studies the problem of efficiently schedulling fully strict (i.e., well-structured) multithreaded computations on parallel computers. A popular and practical method of scheduling this kind of dynamic MIMD-style computation is “work stealing,” in which processors needing work steal computational threads from other processors. In this paper, we give the first provably good work-stealing scheduler for multithreaded computations with dependencies. Specifically, our analysis shows that the expected time to execute a fully strict computation on P processors using our work-stealing scheduler is T 1 / P + O ( T ∞ , where T 1 is the minimum serial execution time of the multithreaded computation and ( T ∞ is the minimum execution time with an infinite number of processors. Moreover, the space required by the execution is at most S 1 P , where S 1 is the minimum serial space requirement. We also show that the expected total communication of the algorithm is at most O ( PT ∞ ( 1 + n d ) S max ), where S max is the size of the largest activation record of any thread and n d is the maximum number of times that any thread synchronizes with its parent. This communication bound justifies the folk wisdom that work-stealing schedulers are more communication efficient than their work-sharing counterparts. All three of these bounds are existentially optimal to within a constant factor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Demystifying Parallel and Distributed Deep Learning: An In-depth Concurrency Analysis
Ben-Nun, T., & Hoefler, T. (2020) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3320060 · Cited by 577
The Power of Two Random Choices: A Survey of Techniques and Results
Mitzenmacher, M., Richa, A. W., & Sitaraman, R. (2001) · Combinatorial Optimization · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-0013-1_9 · Cited by 431
Augment your batch: Improving generalization through instance repetition
Hoffer, E., Ben-Nun, T., Hubara, I., Giladi, N., Hoefler, T., & Soudry, D. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00815 · Cited by 166
Metadata
- Authors
- Blumofe, R. D., & Leiserson, C. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the ACM
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 720-748
- ISSN
- 0004-5411 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-735X
- OpenAlex
- W2016559894
- Cited by
- 1,336
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scheduling multithreaded computations by work stealing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/324133.324234
- The paper
- Blumofe, R. D., & Leiserson, C. E. (1999). Scheduling multithreaded computations by work stealing. Journal of the ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/324133.324234
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.