The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Data Work in Healthcare: Challenges for Patients, Clinicians and Administrators
Abstract
With the wide adoption of information infrastructures in healthcare (IIH), citizens and healthcare professionals now carry out intensive "data work' as part of their healthcare and self-management practices. For example, citizens use mobile apps to track personal health data for both formal and informal usages, clinicians rely on electronic health records (EHR) to document patient information, and hospital administrators use EHRs to generate data to monitor quality and efficiency of healthcare services. The creation, accumulation, management, and communication of data is increasingly central to patient work, clinical work, and management and governance of healthcare providers. To better understand data work in healthcare, this workshop aims to convene researchers from different disciplines to discuss data work performed among the entire ecosystem of clinical care delivery from patients to clinicians to administrators. Critical topics include but are not limited to: patient data work (both voluntary and compelled by clinicians as part of treatment); algorithmic authority of information infrastructure and effects on the exercise of expertise and discretion of healthcare professions; clinician demands for documentation (and balancing these demands with patient-centered care); new forms of healthcare data work, including new occupations and tasks; and data-driven accountability and management in healthcare.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“However, patients and healthcare providers face difficulties communicating the progress due to the complexity of the recovery progress data collected over weeks or months and the data being scattered at various locations of Electronic Medical Record (EMR) [44, 51].”
From A Data Visualization Tool for Patients and Healthcare Providers to Communicate during Inpatient Stroke Rehabilitation (2024) · cites this paper as [44]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1007/s10606-010-9130-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.01.004 · DOI
- 10.1145/2145204.2145341 · DOI
- Geoffrey Bowker . 2008. Memory Practices in the Sciences . Cambridge : The MIT Press . Geoffrey Bowker. 2008. Memory Practices in the Sciences. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
- Bente Christensen & Gunnar Ellingsen . 2014 . User-Controlled standardization of health care practices , Proc ECIS, Tel Aviv , 2014 Bente Christensen & Gunnar Ellingsen. 2014. User-Controlled standardization of health care practices, Proc ECIS, Tel Aviv, 2014
- 10.1007/s10606-010-9122-y · DOI
- Lisa Gitelman . 2013. Raw Data Is an Oxymoron . Boston : MIT Press . Lisa Gitelman. 2013. Raw Data Is an Oxymoron. Boston: MIT Press.
- 10.1007/s10606-012-9167-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Naja L. Møller & Signe Vikkelsø. 2012. The clinical work of secretaries: Exploring the intersection of administrative work and clinical work in the diagnosing process In Dugdale et al. (eds) From Research to Practice in the Design of Cooperative Systems 33--47. Naja L. Møller & Signe Vikkelsø. 2012. The clinical work of secretaries: Exploring the intersection of administrative work and clinical work in the diagnosing process In Dugdale et al. (eds) From Research to Practice in the Design of Cooperative Systems 33--47. · DOI
- 10.1145/2998181.2998296 · DOI
- 10.5555/3056035 · DOI
- 10.1145/2531602.2531652 · DOI
- 10.1145/2702123.2702298 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
"This machine is for the aides": Tailoring Voice Assistant Design to Home Health Care Work
Bartle, V., Albright, L., & Dell, N. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581118 · Cited by 18
Ramesh, S. H., Ouskine, A., Khorasani, E., Ebrahimipour, M., Finestone, H., Chan, A. D. C., & Rajabiyazdi, F. (2024) · Graphics Interface · doi:10.1145/3670947.3670978 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Pine, K. H., Bossen, C., Chen, Y., Ellingsen, G., Grisot, M., Mazmanian, M., & Møller, N. H.
- Affiliations
- Arizona State University (US)
- Aarhus University (DK)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
- Høyskolen Kristiania (NO)
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-10-30
- Pages
- 433-439
- OpenAlex
- W2899221473
- Cited by
- 31
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 2.33
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Medical Coding and Health Information
- Keywords
- data work, healthcare information infrastructure, electronic health records, patient self-management, mobile health apps, clinical documentation, algorithmic authority, patient-centered care, health care governance, health data management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Data Work in Healthcare: Challenges for Patients, Clinicians and Administrators. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3272973.3273017
- The paper
- Pine, K. H., Bossen, C., Chen, Y., Ellingsen, G., Grisot, M., Mazmanian, M., & Møller, N. H. (2018). Data Work in Healthcare: Challenges for Patients, Clinicians and Administrators. Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. https://doi.org/10.1145/3272973.3273017