The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring and Mitigating Unintended Bias in Text Classification
Open accessAbstract
We introduce and illustrate a new approach to measuring and mitigating unintended bias in machine learning models. Our definition of unintended bias is parameterized by a test set and a subset of input features. We illustrate how this can be used to evaluate text classifiers using a synthetic test set and a public corpus of comments annotated for toxicity from Wikipedia Talk pages. We also demonstrate how imbalances in training data can lead to unintended bias in the resulting models, and therefore potentially unfair applications. We use a set of common demographic identity terms as the subset of input features on which we measure bias. This technique permits analysis in the common scenario where demographic information on authors and readers is unavailable, so that bias mitigation must focus on the content of the text itself. The mitigation method we introduce is an unsupervised approach based on balancing the training dataset. We demonstrate that this approach reduces the unintended bias without compromising overall model quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Synthetic data is valuable here because [11] shows that real data often has disproportionate amounts of toxicity directed at specific groups.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Prior work has shown that toxicity classifiers can pick up on biases in the training data and spuriously associate toxicity with the mention of certain demographics (Park et al., 2018; Dixon et al., 2018).”
From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Dixon et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An introduction to ROC analysis
Fawcett, T. (2006) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 · Cited by 21,879
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520 · Cited by 1,615
Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.05807 · Cited by 941
Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale
Wulczyn, E., Thain, N., & Dixon, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052591 · Cited by 636
Self-citationInherent Tradeoffs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603197 · Cited by 350
Gender and Dialect Bias in YouTube’s Automatic Captions
Tatman, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the First ACL Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-1606 · Cited by 338
The social impact of natural language processing
Hovy, D., & Spruit, S. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-2096 · Cited by 329
Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair RepresentationsPreprint
Beutel, A., Chen, J., Zhao, Z., & Chi, E. H. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.00075 · Cited by 282
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 664
Czymara, C. S., Dochow-Sondershaus, S., Drouhot, L. G., Şimşek, M., & Spörlein, C. (2022) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2022.2100552 · Cited by 28
Recognizing misogynous memes: Biased models and tricky archetypes
Rizzi, G., Gasparini, F., Saibene, A., Rosso, P., & Fersini, E. (2023) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103474 · Cited by 30
Towards Multimodal Sentiment Analysis Debiasing via Bias Purification
Yang, D., Li, M., Xiao, D., Liu, Y., Yang, K., Chen, Z., Wang, Y., Zhai, P., Li, K. J., & Zhang, L. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-73636-0_27 · Cited by 30
The Authors Matter: Understanding and Mitigating Implicit Bias in Deep Text Classification
Liu, H., Jin, W., Karimi, H., Liu, Z., & Tang, J. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.7 · Cited by 33
Latent Hatred: A Benchmark for Understanding Implicit Hate SpeechPreprint
ElSherief, M., Ziems, C., Muchlinski, D., Anupindi, V., Seybolt, J., Choudhury, M. D., & Yang, D. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.05322 · Cited by 28
Exploring content moderation in the decentralised web
Anaobi, I. H., Raman, A., Castro, I., Zia, H. B., Cristofaro, E. D., Sastry, N., & Gareth Tyson, A. (2021) · ACM International Conference on emerging Networking EXperiments and Technologies (CoNEXT) · doi:10.1145/3485983.3494838 · Cited by 27
SenSeI: Sensitive Set Invariance for Enforcing Individual FairnessPreprint
Yurochkin, M., & Sun, Y. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.14168 · Cited by 40
Measuring and Improving Model-Moderator Collaboration using Uncertainty Estimation
Kivlichan, I., Lin, Z. J., Liu, J. Z., & Vasserman, L. (2021) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.woah-1.5 · Cited by 26
Self-citationSinghal, P., Gokhale, S., Shah, A., Jain, D. K., Walambe, R. A., Ekárt, A., & Kotecha, K. V. (2025) · Discover Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-025-06659-1 · Cited by 26
Towards Understanding Gender Bias in Relation Extraction
Gaut, A., Sun, T., Tang, S., Huang, Y., Qian, J., ElSherief, M., Zhao, J., Mirza, D., Belding, E., Chang, K.-W., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.265 · Cited by 26
Necessity and Sufficiency for Explaining Text Classifiers: A Case Study in Hate Speech Detection
Balkır, E., Nejadgholi, I., Fraser, K., & Kiritchenko, S. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.192 · Cited by 30
Detoxifying Text with MaRCo: Controllable Revision with Experts and Anti-Experts
Hallinan, S., Liu, A., Choi, Y., & Sap, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.21 · Cited by 36
Comparative Evaluation of Label-Agnostic Selection Bias in Multilingual Hate Speech Datasets
Ousidhoum, N. D., Song, Y., & Yeung, D. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.199 · Cited by 26
Fairness On The Ground: Applying Algorithmic Fairness Approaches to Production SystemsPreprint
Bakalar, C., Barreto, R. D. C., Bergman, S., Bogen, M., Chern, B., Corbett‐Davies, S., Hall, M. A., Kloumann, I. M., Lam, M. S., Candela, J. Q., et al. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.06172 · Cited by 40
Utilizing subjectivity level to mitigate identity term bias in toxic comments classification
Zhao, Z., Zhang, Z., & Hopfgartner, F. (2022) · Online Social Networks and Media · doi:10.1016/j.osnem.2022.100205 · Cited by 26
Improving Generalizability in Implicitly Abusive Language Detection with Concept Activation Vectors
Nejadgholi, I., Fraser, K., & Kiritchenko, S. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.378 · Cited by 24
Selection Bias Explorations and Debias Methods for Natural Language Sentence Matching Datasets
Zhang, G., Bai, B., Liang, J., Bai, K., Chang, S., Yu, M., Zhu, C., & Zhao, T. (2019) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1435 · Cited by 25
FuzzE: Fuzzy Fairness Evaluation of Offensive Language Classifiers on African-American English
Rios, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i01.5434 · Cited by 23
Characterizing Variation in Toxic Language by Social Context
Radfar, B., Shivaram, K., & Culotta, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v14i1.7366 · Cited by 25
Neumann, T., De‐Arteaga, M., & Fazelpour, S. (2022) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533205 · Cited by 29
Hi, my name is Martha: Using names to measure and mitigate bias in generative dialogue modelsPreprint
Smith, E. M., & Williams, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.03300 · Cited by 33
Ahmed, Z., Vidgen, B., & Hale, S. A. (2022) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00319-9 · Cited by 22
Features or Spurious Artifacts? Data-centric Baselines for Fair and Robust Hate Speech Detection
Ramponi, A., & Tonelli, S. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.221 · Cited by 22
Raza, S. (2022) · Healthcare Analytics · doi:10.1016/j.health.2022.100100 · Cited by 24
Fairness-Aware Structured Pruning in Transformers
Zayed, A., Mordido, G., Shabanian, S., Baldini, I., & Chandar, S. (2024) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i20.30256 · Cited by 25
Selective Classification Can Magnify Disparities Across GroupsPreprint
Jones, E., Sagawa, S., Koh, P. W., Kumar, A., & Liang, P. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.14134 · Cited by 34
Hartmann, D., Oueslati, A., Staufer, D., Pohlmann, L., Munzert, S., & Heuer, H. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713998 · Cited by 29
Mendon-Plasek, A. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56286-1_2 · Cited by 23
Reducing Unintended Bias of ML Models on Tabular and Textual Data
Alves, G., Amblard, M., Bernier, F., Couceiro, M., & Napoli, A. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA) · doi:10.1109/dsaa53316.2021.9564112 · Cited by 25
Examining and mitigating gender bias in text emotion detection task
Odbal, O., Zhang, G., & Ananiadou, S. (2022) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2022.04.057 · Cited by 21
Benchmarking Post-Hoc Interpretability Approaches for Transformer-based Misogyny Detection
Attanasio, G., Nozza, D., Pastor, E., & Hovy, D. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.nlppower-1.11 · Cited by 21
Counterfactually Augmented Data and Unintended Bias: The Case of Sexism and Hate Speech Detection
Sen, I., Samory, M., Wagner, C., & Augenstein, I. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.347 · Cited by 21
Mitigating Biases in Toxic Language Detection through Invariant Rationalization
Chuang, Y.-S., Gao, M., Luo, H., Glass, J. R., Lee, H.-Y., Chen, Y.-N., & Li, S.-W. D. (2021) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.woah-1.12 · Cited by 24
Toward a better trade-off between performance and fairness with kernel-based distribution matchingPreprint
Prost, F., Qian, H., Chen, Q., Ed, H., Chen, J., & Beutel, A. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.11779 · Cited by 21
Oh, D., & Downey, J. (2024) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2024.2346531 · Cited by 20
Learning Disentangled Textual Representations via Statistical Measures of Similarity
Colombo, P., Staerman, G., Noiry, N., & Piantanida, P. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.187 · Cited by 20
Directions for NLP Practices Applied to Online Hate Speech Detection
Fortuna, P., Domínguez, M., Wanner, L., & Talat, Z. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.809 · Cited by 20
Narimanzadeh, H., Badie-Modiri, A., Smirnova, I., & Chen, T. H. Y. (2023) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3610183 · Cited by 20
Lin, C., Gao, Y., Ta, N., Li, K., & Fu, H. (2023) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2023.102068 · Cited by 20
How Hate Speech Varies by Target Identity: A Computational Analysis
Yoder, M. M., Ng, L. H. X., Brown, D. W., & Carley, K. M. (2022) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.conll-1.3 · Cited by 20
Refining Language Models with Compositional ExplanationsPreprint
Yao, H., Chen, Y., Ye, Q., Jin, X., & Ren, X. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.10415 · Cited by 20
The Effect of Content Moderation on Online and Offline Hate: Evidence from Germany's NetzDGPreprint
Durán, R. J., Müller, K., & Schwarz, C. R. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4230296 · Cited by 20
A Large-Scale English Multi-Label Twitter Dataset for Cyberbullying and Online Abuse Detection
Salawu, S., Lumsden, J., & He, Y. (2021) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.woah-1.16 · Cited by 19
Detecting Unintended Social Bias in Toxic Language Datasets
Sahoo, N., Gupta, H., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2022) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.conll-1.10 · Cited by 25
Black, E., Naidu, R. C. A., Ghani, R., Rodolfa, K. T., Ho, D. E., & Heidari, H. (2023) · ACM Conference on Equity and Access in Algorithms, Mechanisms, and Optimization (EAAMO) · doi:10.1145/3617694.3623259 · Cited by 19
Auditing GPT's Content Moderation Guardrails: Can ChatGPT Write Your Favorite TV Show?
Mahomed, Y., Crawford, C. M., Gautam, S., Friedler, S. A., & Metaxa, D. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658932 · Cited by 25
Multi-Layer Personalized Federated Learning for Mitigating Biases in Student Predictive Analytics
Chu, Y.-W., Hosseinalipour, S., Tenorio, E., Cruz, L., Douglas, K. A., Lan, A., & Brinton, C. G. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing · doi:10.1109/tetc.2024.3407716 · Cited by 19
Limitations of Pinned AUC for Measuring Unintended BiasPreprint
Borkan, D., Dixon, L., Li, J., Sorensen, J. S., Thain, N., & Vasserman, L. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1903.02088 · Cited by 19
Self-citationPotential Pitfalls With Automatic Sentiment Analysis: The Example of Queerphobic Bias
Ungless, E. L., Roß, B., & Belle, V. (2023) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/08944393231152946 · Cited by 20
Hate Speech Classifiers are Culturally Insensitive
Lee, N., Jung, C., & Oh, A. H. (2023) · Workshop on Cross-Cultural Considerations in NLP (C3NLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.c3nlp-1.5 · Cited by 18
Gálvez-Hernández, P., Gónzalez-Viana, A., Paz, L. G., Shankardass, K., & Muntaner, C. (2023) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/50379 · Cited by 18
Lee, C., Gligorić, K., Kalluri, P., Harrington, M., Durmus, E., Sanchez, K. L., San, N., Tse, D., Zhao, X., Hamedani, M. G., et al. (2024) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2322764121 · Cited by 26
Machine Learning Model Cards Transparency Review : Using model card toolkit
Wadhwani, A., & Jain, P. (2020) · IEEE Pune Section International Conference (PuneCon) · doi:10.1109/punecon50868.2020.9362382 · Cited by 19
The untapped potential of mining news media events for understanding environmental change
Buckingham, K. C., Brandt, J., Anderson, W., do Amaral, L. F., & Singh, R. (2020) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2020.08.015 · Cited by 18
The Economics of Content Moderation: Theory and Experimental Evidence from Hate Speech on TwitterPreprint
Jiménez-Durán, R. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4590147 · Cited by 18
Gender-tuning: Empowering Fine-tuning for Debiasing Pre-trained Language Models
Ghanbarzadeh, S., Huang, Y., Palangi, H., Cruz Moreno, R., & Khanpour, H. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.336 · Cited by 17
Debiasing Vandalism Detection Models at Wikidata
Heindorf, S., Scholten, Y., Engels, G., & Potthast, M. (2019) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3308558.3313507 · Cited by 17
Seganti, A., Sobol, H., Orlova, I., Kim, H., Staniszewski, J., Krumholc, T., & Koziel, K. (2019) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/s19-2126 · Cited by 20
Persian offensive language detection
Kebriaei, E., Homayouni, A., Faraji, R., Razavi, A., Shakery, A., Faili, H., & Yaghoobzadeh, Y. (2023) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/s10994-023-06370-5 · Cited by 18
The Role of Protected Class Word Lists in Bias Identification of Contextualized Word Representations
Sedoc, J., & Ungar, L. (2019) · Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/w19-3808 · Cited by 19
Reducing Unintended Identity Bias in Russian Hate Speech Detection
Zueva, N., Kabirova, M., & Kalaidin, P. (2020) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.alw-1.8 · Cited by 21
Pruksachatkun, Y., Krishna, S., Dhamala, J., Gupta, R., & Chang, K.-W. (2021) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.findings-acl.294 · Cited by 21
Gender bias in legal corpora and debiasing it
Sevim, N., Şahi̇nuç, F., & Koç, A. (2022) · Natural Language Engineering · doi:10.1017/s1351324922000122 · Cited by 22
Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Natural Language Processing: Past, Present, and Future
Yang, L., Song, Y., Ren, X., Lyu, C., Wang, Y., Zhuo, J., Liu, L., Wang, J., Foster, J., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.276 · Cited by 21
Li, Y., Du, M., Song, R., Wang, X., Sun, M., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.artint.2024.104143 · Cited by 16
From Toxicity in Online Comments to Incivility in American News: Proceed with Caution
Hede, A., Agarwal, O., Lu, L., Mutz, D. C., & Nenkova, A. (2021) · Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.eacl-main.225 · Cited by 16
Bias and comparison framework for abusive language datasets
Wich, M., Eder, T., Kuwatly, H. A., & Groh, G. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00081-0 · Cited by 16
Gong, L., Zhang, J., Wei, M., Zhang, H., & Huang, Z. (2022) · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · doi:10.1145/3569934 · Cited by 17
Evaluating Errors and Improving Performance of ChatGPT
Biswas, S. S. (2023) · International Journal of Clinical and Medical Education Research · doi:10.33140/ijcmer.02.06.05 · Cited by 17
Guiding the Release of Safer E2E Conversational AI through Value Sensitive Design
Bergman, A. S., Abercrombie, G., Spruit, S. L., Hovy, D., Dinan, E., Boureau, Y.-L., & Rieser, V. (2022) · Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.sigdial-1.4 · Cited by 16
Six Attributes of Unhealthy ConversationPreprint
Price, I., Gifford-Moore, J., Fleming, J., Musker, S., Roichman, M., Sylvain, G., Thain, N., Dixon, L., & Sorensen, J. S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.07410 · Cited by 20
Self-citationArtificial Financial IntelligencePreprint
Magnuson, W. J. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3403712 · Cited by 16
Shvetsova, O. A., Katalshov, D., & Lee, S.-K. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15137298 · Cited by 18
Fair classification via domain adaptation: A dual adversarial learning approach
Liang, Y., Chen, C., Tian, T., & Shu, K. (2023) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2022.1049565 · Cited by 15
Ashktorab, Z., Hoover, B., Agarwal, M., Dugan, C., Geyer, W., Yang, H., & Yurochkin, M. (2023) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3581227 · Cited by 21
Hunter, S. B., Mathews, F., & Weeds, J. (2023) · Ecological Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2023.102076 · Cited by 15
LOGAN: Local Group Bias Detection by Clustering
Zhao, J., & Chang, K.-W. (2020) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.155 · Cited by 15
Anoop, K. R., Gangan, M. P., Deepak, P., & Lajish, V. L. (2022) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-4453-6_2 · Cited by 17
A Near-Optimal Algorithm for Debiasing Trained Machine Learning ModelsPreprint
Alabdulmohsin, I., & Lučić, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.12887 · Cited by 17
Combating Online Hate Speech: The Impact of Legislation on TwitterPreprint
Andres, R., & Slivko, O. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4013662 · Cited by 18
Synthetic data distillation enables the extraction of clinical information at scale
Woo, E. G., Burkhart, M. C., Alsentzer, E., & Beaulieu‐Jones, B. K. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01681-4 · Cited by 18
Wiegand, M., Eder, E., & Ruppenhofer, J. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.410 · Cited by 14
Muralikumar, M. D., Yang, Y. S., & McDonald, D. W. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Social Computing · doi:10.1145/3582568 · Cited by 14
Anagnostopoulos, C. (2023) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.141958.1 · Cited by 17
Choenni, R., Shutova, E., & van Rooij, R. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.111 · Cited by 20
Debiasing pretrained text encoders by paying attention to paying attention
Gaci, Y., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., & Benabdeslem, K. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.651 · Cited by 14
Deep Learning on a Healthy Data Diet: Finding Important Examples for Fairness
Zayed, A., Parthasarathi, P., Mordido, G., Palangi, H., Shabanian, S., & Chandar, S. (2023) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v37i12.26706 · Cited by 19
Beyond plain toxic: building datasets for detection of flammable topics and inappropriate statements
Babakov, N., Logacheva, V., & Panchenko, A. (2023) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-023-09682-z · Cited by 16
AAA: Fair Evaluation for Abuse Detection Systems Wanted
Calabrese, A., Bevilacqua, M., Roß, B., Tripodi, R., & Roberto Navigli, A. (2021) · ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci) · doi:10.1145/3447535.3462484 · Cited by 13
COLD: Annotation scheme and evaluation data set for complex offensive language in English
Palmer, A., Carr, C., Robinson, M., & Sanders, J. (2020) · LDV-Forum/Journal for language technology and computational linguistics · doi:10.21248/jlcl.34.2020.222 · Cited by 13
MUSENET: Multi-Scenario Learning for Repeat-Aware Personalized Recommendation
Xu, S., Li, L., Yao, Y., Chen, Z., Wu, H., Lu, Q., & Tong, H. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3539597.3570414 · Cited by 13
Quantifying 60 Years of Gender Bias in Biomedical Research with Word Embeddings
Rios, A., Joshi, R., & Shin, H. (2020) · Workshop on Biomedical Language Processing (BioNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.bionlp-1.1 · Cited by 15
Rissanen Data Analysis: Examining Dataset Characteristics via Description LengthPreprint
Perez, E., Kiela, D., & Cho, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.03872 · Cited by 13
Dbias: Detecting biases and ensuring Fairness in news articlesPreprint
Raza, S., Reji, D. J., & Ding, C. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1356281/v1 · Cited by 15
Social Media vs. Democracy: Evidence from the January 6th Insurrection
Müller, K., Schwarz, C. R., & Shen, Z. (2026) · CESifo · doi:10.65864/qlfi14z2yh · Cited by 14
Which Stereotypes Are Moderated and Under-Moderated in Search Engine Autocompletion?
Leidinger, A., & Rogers, R. (2023) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3593013.3594062 · Cited by 12
Dual-Teacher De-Biasing Distillation Framework for Multi-Domain Fake News Detection
Li, J., Feng, X., Gu, T., & Chang, L. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) · doi:10.1109/icde60146.2024.00279 · Cited by 12
Self-citationGender bias detection on hate speech classification: an analysis at feature-level
Nascimento, F. R. S., Cavalcanti, G. D. C., & Costa‐Abreu, M. D. (2024) · Neural Computing and Applications · doi:10.1007/s00521-024-10841-8 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Dixon, L., Li, J., Sorensen, J., Thain, N., & Vasserman, L.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-12-27
- Pages
- 67-73
- ISSN
- 3065-8365 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2791170418
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 115.48
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- text classification, bias mitigation, demographic bias, toxicity detection, Wikipedia talk pages, imbalanced training data, algorithmic fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review