The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring and Mitigating Unintended Bias in Text Classification
Open accessAbstract
We introduce and illustrate a new approach to measuring and mitigating unintended bias in machine learning models. Our definition of unintended bias is parameterized by a test set and a subset of input features. We illustrate how this can be used to evaluate text classifiers using a synthetic test set and a public corpus of comments annotated for toxicity from Wikipedia Talk pages. We also demonstrate how imbalances in training data can lead to unintended bias in the resulting models, and therefore potentially unfair applications. We use a set of common demographic identity terms as the subset of input features on which we measure bias. This technique permits analysis in the common scenario where demographic information on authors and readers is unavailable, so that bias mitigation must focus on the content of the text itself. The mitigation method we introduce is an unsupervised approach based on balancing the training dataset. We demonstrate that this approach reduces the unintended bias without compromising overall model quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Synthetic data is valuable here because [11] shows that real data often has disproportionate amounts of toxicity directed at specific groups.”
From Model Cards for Model Reporting (2019) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Prior work has shown that toxicity classifiers can pick up on biases in the training data and spuriously associate toxicity with the mention of certain demographics (Park et al., 2018; Dixon et al., 2018).”
From WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shifts (2020) · cites this paper as Dixon et al., 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An introduction to ROC analysis
Fawcett, T. (2006) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 · Cited by 21,879
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Certifying and Removing Disparate Impact
Feldman, M., Friedler, S. A., Moeller, J., Scheidegger, C., & Venkatasubramanian, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2783258.2783311 · Cited by 1,827
Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddings
Bolukbasi, T., Chang, K.-W., Zou, J., Saligrama, V., & Kalai, A. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.06520 · Cited by 1,615
Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., & Raghavan, M. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.05807 · Cited by 941
Ex Machina: Personal Attacks Seen at Scale
Wulczyn, E., Thain, N., & Dixon, L. (2017) · Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/3038912.3052591 · Cited by 636
Self-citationInherent Tradeoffs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
Raghavan, M. (2023) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3603195.3603197 · Cited by 350
Gender and Dialect Bias in YouTube’s Automatic Captions
Tatman, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the First ACL Workshop on Ethics in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/w17-1606 · Cited by 338
The social impact of natural language processing
Hovy, D., & Spruit, S. L. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-2096 · Cited by 329
Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair RepresentationsPreprint
Beutel, A., Chen, J., Zhao, Z., & Chi, E. H. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1707.00075 · Cited by 282
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 501–600 of 664
Robust Infidelity: When Faithfulness Measures on Masked Language Models Are Misleading
Crothers, E., Viktor, H. L., & Japkowicz, N. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82481-4_10 · Cited by 2
Hafner, F. S., Hafner, L., & Corizzo, R. (2025) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-025-00382-y · Cited by 3
Examining inferred author and textual correlates of harmful language annotation
Korre, K., Yenikent, S., Basile, A., Spallaccia, B., Franco-Salvador, M., & Barrón‐Cedeño, A. (2025) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-025-09822-7 · Cited by 3
Legal Assessment of Bias and Discrimination of AI Toolsin Higher Education and Research
Bitar, M., Khalil, A., Raj, S. A. K., & Malik, R. (2025) · PRAWO i WIĘŹ · doi:10.36128/priw.vi56.896 · Cited by 4
The Content Moderator’s Dilemma: Removal of Toxic Content and Distortions to Online Discourse
Habibi, M., Schwarz, C. R., & Schwarz, C. R. (2026) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1093/ej/ueag115 · Cited by 2
Muti, A., Fernicola, F., & Barrón‐Cedeño, A. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.158 · Cited by 3
Don’t Just Clean It, Proxy Clean It: Mitigating Bias by Proxy in Pre-Trained Models
Panda, S., Kobren, A., Wick, M., & Shen, Q. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.372 · Cited by 5
Sobhani, N., Sengupta, K., Microsoft, D., & Delany, S. J. (2023) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-092-2_119 · Cited by 2
Classification of Toxic Comments on Social Networks Using Machine Learning
Revelo-Bautista, M. F., Benavides, J. O. B., Sayago‐Heredia, J., Pico-Valencia, P., & Quiñónez-Ku, X. (2024) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-58953-9_20 · Cited by 2
Diverse mobile users: the development of library experts
Hahn, J. (2018) · Reference Services Review · doi:10.1108/rsr-07-2018-0056 · Cited by 2
Optimizing Generalized Rate Metrics through Game EquilibriumPreprint
Narasimhan, H., Cotter, A., & Gupta, M. R. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.02939 · Cited by 2
Algorithmic Censorship by Social Platforms: Power and ResistancePreprint
Cobbe, J. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3437304 · Cited by 2
Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm UtilityPreprint
Cui, S., Pan, W., Zhang, C., & Wang, F. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.08267 · Cited by 3
Improving Counterfactual Generation for Fair Hate Speech DetectionPreprint
Davani, A. M., Omrani, A., Kennedy, B., Atari, M., Ren, X., & Dehghani, M. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.01721 · Cited by 2
Learning Neural Models for Natural Language Processing in the Face of Distributional ShiftPreprint
Michel, P. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.01558 · Cited by 2
Measure Twice, Cut Once: Quantifying Bias and Fairness in Deep Neural NetworksPreprint
Blakeney, C., Atkinson, G., Huish, N., Yan, Y., Metris, V., & Zong, Z. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.04397 · Cited by 3
Adversarial Scrubbing of Demographic Information for Text ClassificationPreprint
Chowdhury, S. B. R., Ghosh, S., Li, Y., Oliva, J. B., Srivastava, S., & Chaturvedi, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.08613 · Cited by 4
Hate speech and offensive language detection using transfer learning approaches
Mozafari, M. (2021) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/9fc685efz2a9cz4fa0z9041z5001b09e8195 · Cited by 2
What changed? Investigating debiasing methods using causal mediation analysis
Jeoung, S., & Diesner, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Gender Bias in Natural Language Processing (GeBNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.gebnlp-1.26 · Cited by 5
Protecting marginalized communities by mitigating discrimination in toxic language detection
Faal, F., Schmitt, K., & Yu, J. Y. (2021) · IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) · doi:10.1109/istas52410.2021.9629201 · Cited by 1
ToxVI: a Multimodal LLM-based Framework for Generating Intervention in Toxic Code-Mixed Videos
Maity, K., Poornash, A. S., Saha, S., & Pasupa, K. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3627673.3680004 · Cited by 1
Research on Toxic Speech Detection Based on Large Language Models
Li, W., Gao, Y., Zhang, Y., Yang, L., & Gao, R. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications (TrustCom) · doi:10.1109/trustcom63139.2024.00302 · Cited by 1
WATER: A Two-Stage in-Context Learning Debiasing Framework for Multilingual Text Classification
Huang, W., Long, Z., Zhou, D. M., Chen, Z., Zhou, Y., Lin, N., & Yang, A. (2025) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd64889.2025.11033553 · Cited by 1
Investigation of Toxicity Detection Models
Wang, M., Cao, F., & Lu, N. (2025) · International Conference on IoT, Data Science and Advanced Computing (IDSAC) · doi:10.1109/idsac65763.2025.11170173 · Cited by 1
Aykaç, Y. E., Ozkan, M., & Samet, R. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3659042 · Cited by 1
Xue, J., Wang, B., Wang, P., Niu, D., & Wei, B. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm66473.2025.11356416 · Cited by 1
LIME-EC: an Agnostic Approach to Quantifying Model Interpretability using Explanation Clustering
Carvalho, C. S., Mattos, J. C. B., & de Aguiar, M. S. (2025) · International Conference on Soft Computing & Machine Intelligence (ISCMI) · doi:10.1109/iscmi67495.2025.11358444 · Cited by 1
Operational fairness diagnostics for AI-based detection systems: Metrics and methodology
Braga, C. M., Serrano, M. A., & Fernández‐Medina, E. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.116369 · Cited by 1
DGDS: Reliability-Gated Neuro-Symbolic Learning for Roman Urdu Hate Speech Detection
Wang, R. L., Peng, M., Liu, J., & Huang, X. (2026) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app16157394 · Cited by 1
8. Algorithms Against Antisemitism?
Steffen, E., Pustet, M., & Mihaljević, H. (2024) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0406.08 · Cited by 1
Research on Entity Representation Bias Adjustment in Causal Relationship Extraction
Yang, J., Ji, D., Mei, L., & Hu, M. Q. (2024) · International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence (ICCAI) · doi:10.1145/3669754.3669801 · Cited by 1
Bias Exposed: The BiaXposer Framework for NLP Fairness
Gaci, Y., Benatallah, B., Casati, F., & Benabdeslem, K. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-0805-8_22 · Cited by 1
Gender bias in Artificial Intelligence
Cuesta, J. (2025) · Journal of Economic Policy Reform · doi:10.1080/17487870.2025.2579039 · Cited by 1
Chaturvedi, K., Khapekar, Y., Sankathala, S., Shrivastav, A., Saraf, A. H., & Das, S. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-3063-1.ch002 · Cited by 1
Yadav, S., Kaushik, A., & McDaid, K. (2026) · Applied AI Letters · doi:10.1002/ail2.70028 · Cited by 1
Take the Power Back: Screen-Based Personal Moderation Against Hate Speech on Instagram
Luther, A., Heuer, H., Haunss, S., Geise, S., & Breiter, A. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790748 · Cited by 2
Mitigating Implicit Bias in Chinese Toxic Speech Detection via Unbiased Contrastive Learning
Feng, X., Yao, Y., Gu, T., Chang, L., & Liu, X. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing · doi:10.1145/3816029 · Cited by 1
Implicit Bias in Large Language Model Diagnosis of Eating Disorders: Experimental Vignette Study
McCalla, D., Li, B.-C., Jaeger, S., Jacques, J., Gonzalez, L., Silber, C., & Dykeman, C. (2026) · JMIR AI · doi:10.2196/93498
Does reusing pre-trained NLP model propagate bugs?
Chakraborty, M. (2021) · ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE) · doi:10.1145/3468264.3473494 · Cited by 1
Examining Stereotypes in News Articles
Zhang, D., & Rayz, J. T. (2022) · Proceedings of the ... International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference · doi:10.32473/flairs.v35i.130642 · Cited by 1
Lost in Distillation: A Case Study in Toxicity Modeling
Chvasta, A., Lees, A., Sorensen, J. S., Vasserman, L., & Goyal, N. (2022) · Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms (WOAH) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.woah-1.9 · Cited by 2
Self-citationQuantifying and Debiasing Gender Bias in Japanese Gender-specific Words with Word Embedding
Chen, L., & Sugimoto, T. (2022) · Joint International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems and International Symposium on Advanced Intelligent Systems (SCIS&ISIS) · doi:10.1109/scisisis55246.2022.10001950 · Cited by 1
Addressing Biases in the Texts Using an End-to-End Pipeline Approach
Raza, S., Bashir, S. R., Sneha, S., & Qamar, U. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-37249-0_8 · Cited by 1
CFL: Causally Fair Language Models Through Token-level Attribute Controlled Generation
Madhavan, R., Garg, R., Wadhawan, K., & Mehta, S. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-acl.720 · Cited by 4
Knowledge-Grounded Target Group Language Recognition in Hate Speech
Lobo, P. R., Daga, E., Alani, H., & Fernández, M. (2023) · Studies on the semantic web · doi:10.3233/ssw230002 · Cited by 1
Emotionally-Bridged Cross-Lingual Meta-Learning for Chinese Sexism Detection
Li, G., Rajapaksha, P., Farahbakhsh, R., & Crespi, N. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44696-2_49 · Cited by 1
CCPC: A Hierarchical Chinese Corpus for Patronizing and Condescending Language Detection
Wang, H., Li, M., Lu, J., Yang, L., Xia, H., & Lin, H. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44696-2_50 · Cited by 1
Evaluating Stereotypical Biases and Implications for Fairness in Large Language Models
Cao, C., & Bandara, D. (2024) · doi:10.18260/1-2--45767 · Cited by 1
Czymara, C. S., Dochow-Sondershaus, S., Drouhot, L. G., Şimşek, M., & Spörlein, C. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003533368-8 · Cited by 1
Andrade, G., Nery, L. F., Benevenuto, F., Figueiredo, F., & Zannettou, S. (2024) · Brazilian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web · doi:10.5753/webmedia.2024.243106 · Cited by 1
Are Horses Always Strong and Donkeys Dumb? Animal Bias in Vision Language Models
Anas, M., Nadeem, M., Sohail, S. S., Cambria, E., & Hussain, A. (2025) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn64981.2025.11228584 · Cited by 1
Handling Gender Biases in E-Commerce Product Specifications
Suvarna, A., Dey, K., Nagar, S., Madaan, N., & Mehta, S. (2019) · Grace Hopper Celebration India (GHCI) · doi:10.1109/ghci47972.2019.9071916 · Cited by 1
An Analytical Approach for Recognizing the Occupational Gender Bias in the Data Systems
Rai, P., & Kumar, P. N. (2020) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-51859-2_59 · Cited by 1
LegitANN: Neural Network Model with Unbiased Robustness
Pundhir, D. S., Ghose, U., & Kumari, V. (2021) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-33-6546-9_37 · Cited by 1
Terrorism Detection and Approaches to Fairness: A Brief Literature Review
Salaam, C., & Rawat, D. B. (2022) · IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC) · doi:10.1109/ghtc55712.2022.9910986 · Cited by 1
Adversarial Discriminator to Mitigate Gender Bias in Abusive Language Detection
Park, J. S., & Cho, S.-B. (2023) · Frontiers in artificial intelligence and applications · doi:10.3233/faia230473 · Cited by 1
Hate Speech Detection and Bias in Supervised Text Classification
Davidson, T. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197653609.013.16 · Cited by 1
‘Do not parade your ignorance’: Negation as a power tool of toxic geek masculinity
Poucke, M. V. (2024) · SN Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43545-024-00842-8 · Cited by 1
Measuring Bias in Search Results Through Retrieval List Comparison
Ratz, L., Schedl, M., Kopeinik, S., & Rekabsaz, N. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-56069-9_2 · Cited by 1
Small Business Classification By Name: Addressing Gender and Geographic Origin BiasesPreprint
Shapiro, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.10348 · Cited by 1
Independent Ethical Assessment of Text Classification Models: A Hate Speech Detection Case StudyPreprint
Singh, A., Chen, J., Zhang, L., Rasekh, A., Golbin, I., & Rao, A. S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07627 · Cited by 2
#ContextMatters: Advantages and Limitations of Using Machine Learning to Support Women in PoliticsPreprint
Comer, J., Work, S., Mathewson, K. W., Cuthbertson, L., & Machin, K. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.00116 · Cited by 1
On the definition of toxicity in NLPPreprint
Berezin, S., Farahbakhsh, R., & Crespi, N. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.02357 · Cited by 1
Theopolis Monk: Envisioning a Future of A.I. Public Service
Hawley, S. H. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16920-6_14
Boess, S. U., Cheung, Y. M., & Cain, R. L. (2020) · Proceedings of DRS · doi:10.21606/drs.2020.2
Reproducibility Report: Contextualizing Hate Speech Classifiers with Post-hoc ExplanationPreprint
Purohit, K., Iqbal, O., & Mullick, A. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.11412
Extreme Gradient Boosting for Toxic Comment Classification
Jain, M., Patil, M. S., & Mohan, C. (2022) · Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-3015-7_29
Toward Analyzing the Diversity of Extractive Summaries
Hudson, A. D. (2022) · doi:10.15760/etd.7950
Exploring the Impact of Gender Bias Mitigation Approaches on a Downstream Classification Task
Sobhani, N., & Delany, S. J. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-16564-1_10 · Cited by 1
Mitigating Multi-class Unintended Demographic Bias in Text Classification with Adversarial Learning
Pan, L., Yao, L., Zhang, W., & Wang, X. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20891-1_27
Artificial Intelligence Accountability in Emergent Applications
Zini, J. E. (2023) · Advances in computer and electrical engineering book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-6937-8.ch002
Algorithmic Vibe in Information Retrieval
Montazeralghaem, A., Craswell, N., White, R. W., Awadallah, A. H., & Byun, B. (2023) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3543507.3583384
A Comparative Study of Gender Bias Mitigation Techniques and the Role of Implicit StereotypesPreprint
Sobhani, N., & Delany, S. J. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3126256/v1 · Cited by 1
Unveiling the Potential of ChatGPT: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions
Mohsin, H., & Masood, S. (2023) · International Journal of Computer Applications · doi:10.5120/ijca2023922945 · Cited by 1
Reducing cohort bias in natural language understanding systems with targeted self-training scheme
Le, D.-T., Hernandez, G., Chen, B., & Bradford, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-industry.53
QCon at SemEval-2023 Task 10: Data Augmentation and Model Ensembling for Detection of Online Sexism
Feely, W., Gupta, P., Mohanty, M. R., Chon, T., Kundu, T., Singh, V., Atluri, S., Roosta, T. G., Ghaderi, V. S., & Schulam, P. (2023) · International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.semeval-1.175
Mitigating Unintended Identity Bias in Toxicity Detection Language ModelPreprint
Saryazdi, A. H., & Sharifpour, K. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4561446
Influence of Errors on the Evaluation of Text Classification Systems
Bracamonte, V., Hidano, S., & Kiyomoto, S. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45725-8_8
Chandra, M., Ganguly, D., Saha, T., & Ounis, I. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM) · doi:10.1145/3583780.3615261
Inherent Bias in Chatbots: Is It Possible to Create and AI Entity Without Any Bias?
Crowder, J. A. (2023) · Synthesis lectures on engineering, science, and technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-45509-4_12
Tad: A Domain-Aware Framework Learning to Adapt Target Shifts of Hate SpeechPreprint
Xi, R., Yuan, J., & Singh, M. P. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.24496069
Tad: A Domain-Aware Framework Learning to Adapt Target Shifts of Hate SpeechPreprint
Xi, R., Yuan, J., & Singh, M. P. (2023) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.24496069.v1
GENDER DISPARTIES IN THE IMPACT OF TEACHERS’ PSYCHOLOGICAL ABUSE ON STUDENTS’ MENTAL HEALTH
Arshad, A., Hoorain, & Ayyub, A. (2023) · EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND INNOVATION · doi:10.61866/eri.v3i1.84
On a Benefit of Masked Language Model Pretraining: Robustness to Simplicity Bias
Chiang, T.-R. (2023) · International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing and Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (IJCNLP-AACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.ijcnlp-main.8
Detection of offending text for cryptic metaphors and sensitive references
Chang, G., Zhang, R., & Luo, J. (2024) · Atlantis Highlights in Intelligent Systems/Atlantis highlights in intelligent systems · doi:10.2991/978-94-6463-490-7_59
Davis, A., Martin, J., Cooks, E., Vilaro, M. J., Wilson-Howard, D. S., Tang, K., & Krieger, J. L. R. (2024) · Journal of Participatory Medicine · doi:10.2196/57528
Bias Detection and Mitigation in Zero-Shot Spam Classification using LLMs
Salemi, H., Gupta, A., & Purohit, H. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Trust, Privacy and Security in Intelligent Systems and Applications (TPS-ISA) · doi:10.1109/tps-isa62245.2024.00019
Najar, M. A. A. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-5231-1.ch013
Metadata
- Authors
- Dixon, L., Li, J., Sorensen, J., Thain, N., & Vasserman, L.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2018-12-27
- Pages
- 67-73
- ISSN
- 3065-8365 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2791170418
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 77 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 103 · 2022: 120 · 2021: 132 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 115.48
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- text classification, bias mitigation, demographic bias, toxicity detection, Wikipedia talk pages, imbalanced training data, algorithmic fairness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
