Cited by 21Smart Agriculture and AIEconomics of Agriculture and Food MarketsForecasting Techniques and Applications

An interpretable produce price forecasting system for small and marginal farmers in India using collaborative filtering and adaptive nearest neighbors

Open access
Ma, Wei, Nowocin, Kendall, Marathe, Niraj, Chen, George H.·2019·Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development

Abstract

Small and marginal farmers, who account for over 80% of India's agricultural population, often sell their harvest at low, unfavorable prices before spoilage. These farmers often lack access to either cold storage or market forecasts. In particular, by having access to cold storage, farmers can store their produce for longer and thus have more flexibility as to when they should sell their harvest by. Meanwhile, by having access to market forecasts, farmers can more easily identify which markets to sell at and when. While affordable cold storage solutions have become more widely available, there has been less work on produce price forecasting. A key challenge is that in many regions of India, predominantly in rural and remote areas, we have either very limited or no produce pricing data available from public online sources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3287098.3287100

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML can guide crop yield prediction and macroeconomic models that help farmers predict crop demand and decide what to plant at the beginning of the season.

    “ML can guide crop yield prediction [866] and even macroeconomic models that help farmers predict crop demand and decide what to plant at the beginning of the season [503].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [503]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, W., Nowocin, K., Marathe, N., & Chen, G. H.
Affiliations
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • CoolCrop
Venue
Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-01-04
Pages
1-11
OpenAlex
W2903854080
Cited by
21
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.30
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies and Development (ICTD) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Carnegie Mellon University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Forecasting Techniques and Applications
Keywords
smallholder farmers, cold storage, market forecast, collaborative filtering, model interpretability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review