Achieving digital permanence
Abstract
The many challenges to maintaining stored information and ways to overcome them.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Storage and file formats have undergone constant changes over the last years and decades.
“As already briefly mentioned in the introduction, storage and file formats have undergone constant changes over the last years and decades (e.g., Blum & Beyer, 2019).”
From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Blum & Beyer, 2019
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model
Hutmacher, F., Appel, M., & Schwan, S. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2384125 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Blum, R., & Beyer, B.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- New York, NY
- Venue
- Communications of the ACM
- Published
- 2019-04-24
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 36-42
- ISSN
- 0001-0782 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7317
- OpenAlex
- W3161171834
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Communications of the ACM (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Conservation › Digital and Traditional Archives Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Data Storage Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › History of Computing Technologies
- Keywords
- digital preservation, digital permanence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
