The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deferred neural rendering: image synthesis using neural textures
Abstract
The modern computer graphics pipeline can synthesize images at remarkable visual quality; however, it requires well-defined, high-quality 3D content as input. In this work, we explore the use of imperfect 3D content, for instance, obtained from photo-metric reconstructions with noisy and incomplete surface geometry, while still aiming to produce photo-realistic (re-)renderings. To address this challenging problem, we introduce Deferred Neural Rendering , a new paradigm for image synthesis that combines the traditional graphics pipeline with learnable components. Specifically, we propose Neural Textures , which are learned feature maps that are trained as part of the scene capture process. Similar to traditional textures, neural textures are stored as maps on top of 3D mesh proxies; however, the high-dimensional feature maps contain significantly more information, which can be interpreted by our new deferred neural rendering pipeline. Both neural textures and deferred neural renderer are trained end-to-end, enabling us to synthesize photo-realistic images even when the original 3D content was imperfect. In contrast to traditional, black-box 2D generative neural networks, our 3D representation gives us explicit control over the generated output, and allows for a wide range of application domains. For instance, we can synthesize temporally-consistent video re-renderings of recorded 3D scenes as our representation is inherently embedded in 3D space. This way, neural textures can be utilized to coherently re-render or manipulate existing video content in both static and dynamic environments at real-time rates. We show the effectiveness of our approach in several experiments on novel view synthesis, scene editing, and facial reenactment, and compare to state-of-the-art approaches that leverage the standard graphics pipeline as well as conventional generative neural networks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation
Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., & Brox, T. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 · Cited by 99,404
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Image-to-Image Translation with Conditional Adversarial Networks
Isola, P., Zhu, J.-Y., Zhou, T., & Efros, A. A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.632 · Cited by 22,930
Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127647 · Cited by 20,928
Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes
Kingma, D. P., & Welling, M. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6114 · Cited by 20,067
Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
(1993) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1993 · Cited by 17,667
Unsupervised representation learning with deep convolutional generative adversarial networks
Radford, A., Metz, L., & Chintala, S. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1511.06434 · Cited by 12,235
(2017) · Cited by 11,625
Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets
Mirza, M., & Osindero, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.1784 · Cited by 8,863
Structure-from-Motion Revisited
Schonberger, J. L., & Frahm, J.-M. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.445 · Cited by 6,433
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1111/cgf.12756 · doi:10.1111/cgf.12756
- Cohen Taco S, 2014, Transformation properties of learned visual representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7659 · arXiv
- 10.5555/893689 · doi:10.5555/893689
- M. Eisemann B. De Decker M. Magnor P. Bekaert E. De Aguiar N. Ahmed C. Theobalt and A. Sellent. 2008. Floating Textures. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. EUROGRAHICS (2008). M. Eisemann B. De Decker M. Magnor P. Bekaert E. De Aguiar N. Ahmed C. Theobalt and A. Sellent. 2008. Floating Textures. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. EUROGRAHICS (2008). · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01138.x
- Ali Eslami SM, 2018, Frederic Besse, Fabio Viola, Ari S Morcos, Marta Garnelo, Avraham Ruderman, Andrei A Rusu, Ivo Danihelka, Karol Gregor, and others.
- Falorsi Luca, 2018, Explorations in Homeomorphic Variational Auto-Encoding. ICML Workshop on Theoretical Foundations and Applications of Generative Models
- Flynn John, 2016, Proc. CVPR. 5515--5524
- Goodfellow Ian, 2014, Proc. NIPS. 2672--2680
- Heigl Benno, 1999, Van Gool
- Isola Phillip, Proc. CVPR. 5967--5976
- Karras Tero, 2018, Proc. ICLR.
- Diederik, 2014, Kingma and Jimmy Ba
- Diederik, 2013, Kingma and Max Welling
- Kulkarni Tejas D, 2015, Proc. NIPS. 2539--2547
- Magnor Marcus, 1999, Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Synthetic and Natural Hybrid Coding and Three-Dimensional Imaging IWSNHC3DI'99
- 10.1145/2503385.2503434 · doi:10.1145/2503385.2503434
- van den Oord Aäron, 2016, Proc. NIPS. 4797--4805
- Park Eunbyung, 2017, Berg
- Radford Alec, 2016, Proc. ICLR.
- Sitzmann V., Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE.
- Thies Justus, Proc. CVPR.
- 10.1109/ICCV.2017.611 · DOI
- Yan Xinchen, 2016, Proc. NIPS. 1696--1704
- Zheng Ke Colin, 2009, Cohen
- Zhou Tinghui, Proc
Cited by
3D Gaussian Splatting for Real-Time Radiance Field Rendering
Kerbl, B., Kopanas, G., Leimkuehler, T., & Drettakis, G. (2023) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/3592433 · Cited by 6,025
“Deep learning techniques were adopted early for novel-view synthesis [Flynn et al. 2016; Zhou et al. 2016]; CNNs were used to estimate blendingweights [Hedman et al. 2018], or for texture-space solutions [Riegler and Koltun 2020; Thies et al. 2019].”
MethodFaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Images
Rossler, A., Cozzolino, D., Verdoliva, L., Riess, C., Thies, J., & Niessner, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2019.00009 · Cited by 3,314
Self-citationCeleb-DF: A Large-Scale Challenging Dataset for DeepFake Forensics
Li, Y., Yang, X., Sun, P., Qi, H., & Lyu, S. (2020) · 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.00327 · Cited by 1,846
“Although in recent years there have been many sophisticated algorithms for generating realistic synthetic face videos [9, 13, 46, 51, 26, 47, 37, 20, 23, 10, 21, 50], most of these have not been in mainstream as open-source software tools that anyone can use.”
BackgroundNeRF in the Wild: Neural Radiance Fields for Unconstrained Photo Collections
Martin-Brualla, R., Radwan, N., Sajjadi, M. S. M., Barron, J. T., Dosovitskiy, A., & Duckworth, D. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.00713 · Cited by 1,374
Deepfakes and beyond: A Survey of face manipulation and fake detection
Tolosana, R., Vera-Rodriguez, R., Fierrez, J., Morales, A., & Ortega-Garcia, J. (2020) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.06.014 · Cited by 1,237
Metadata
- Authors
- Thies, J., Zollhöfer, M., & Nießner, M.
- Venue
- ACM Transactions on Graphics
- Published
- 2019-07-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-12
- ISSN
- 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7368
- OpenAlex
- W2942074357
- Cited by
- 1,356
- References
- 58
- FWCI
- 97.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deferred neural rendering: image synthesis using neural textures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3306346.3323035
- The paper
- Thies, J., Zollhöfer, M., & Nießner, M. (2019). Deferred neural rendering: image synthesis using neural textures. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306346.3323035
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.