Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deferred neural rendering: image synthesis using neural textures

Thies, Justus, Zollhöfer, Michael, Nießner, Matthias·2019·ACM Transactions on Graphics

Abstract

The modern computer graphics pipeline can synthesize images at remarkable visual quality; however, it requires well-defined, high-quality 3D content as input. In this work, we explore the use of imperfect 3D content, for instance, obtained from photo-metric reconstructions with noisy and incomplete surface geometry, while still aiming to produce photo-realistic (re-)renderings. To address this challenging problem, we introduce Deferred Neural Rendering , a new paradigm for image synthesis that combines the traditional graphics pipeline with learnable components. Specifically, we propose Neural Textures , which are learned feature maps that are trained as part of the scene capture process. Similar to traditional textures, neural textures are stored as maps on top of 3D mesh proxies; however, the high-dimensional feature maps contain significantly more information, which can be interpreted by our new deferred neural rendering pipeline. Both neural textures and deferred neural renderer are trained end-to-end, enabling us to synthesize photo-realistic images even when the original 3D content was imperfect. In contrast to traditional, black-box 2D generative neural networks, our 3D representation gives us explicit control over the generated output, and allows for a wide range of application domains. For instance, we can synthesize temporally-consistent video re-renderings of recorded 3D scenes as our representation is inherently embedded in 3D space. This way, neural textures can be utilized to coherently re-render or manipulate existing video content in both static and dynamic environments at real-time rates. We show the effectiveness of our approach in several experiments on novel view synthesis, scene editing, and facial reenactment, and compare to state-of-the-art approaches that leverage the standard graphics pipeline as well as conventional generative neural networks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3306346.3323035

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 58 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1111/cgf.12756 · doi:10.1111/cgf.12756
  2. Cohen Taco S, 2014, Transformation properties of learned visual representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7659 · arXiv
  3. 10.5555/893689 · doi:10.5555/893689
  4. M. Eisemann B. De Decker M. Magnor P. Bekaert E. De Aguiar N. Ahmed C. Theobalt and A. Sellent. 2008. Floating Textures. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. EUROGRAHICS (2008). M. Eisemann B. De Decker M. Magnor P. Bekaert E. De Aguiar N. Ahmed C. Theobalt and A. Sellent. 2008. Floating Textures. Computer Graphics Forum (Proc. EUROGRAHICS (2008). · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8659.2008.01138.x
  5. Ali Eslami SM, 2018, Frederic Besse, Fabio Viola, Ari S Morcos, Marta Garnelo, Avraham Ruderman, Andrei A Rusu, Ivo Danihelka, Karol Gregor, and others.
  6. Falorsi Luca, 2018, Explorations in Homeomorphic Variational Auto-Encoding. ICML Workshop on Theoretical Foundations and Applications of Generative Models
  7. Flynn John, 2016, Proc. CVPR. 5515--5524
  8. Goodfellow Ian, 2014, Proc. NIPS. 2672--2680
  9. Heigl Benno, 1999, Van Gool
  10. Isola Phillip, Proc. CVPR. 5967--5976
  11. Karras Tero, 2018, Proc. ICLR.
  12. Diederik, 2014, Kingma and Jimmy Ba
  13. Diederik, 2013, Kingma and Max Welling
  14. Kulkarni Tejas D, 2015, Proc. NIPS. 2539--2547
  15. Magnor Marcus, 1999, Proc. 3rd International Workshop on Synthetic and Natural Hybrid Coding and Three-Dimensional Imaging IWSNHC3DI'99
  16. 10.1145/2503385.2503434 · doi:10.1145/2503385.2503434
  17. van den Oord Aäron, 2016, Proc. NIPS. 4797--4805
  18. Park Eunbyung, 2017, Berg
  19. Radford Alec, 2016, Proc. ICLR.
  20. Sitzmann V., Proc. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), IEEE.
  21. Thies Justus, Proc. CVPR.
  22. 10.1109/ICCV.2017.611 · DOI
  23. Yan Xinchen, 2016, Proc. NIPS. 1696--1704
  24. Zheng Ke Colin, 2009, Cohen
  25. Zhou Tinghui, Proc

Cited by

See all 1,356

Metadata

Authors
Thies, J., Zollhöfer, M., & Nießner, M.
Venue
ACM Transactions on Graphics
Published
2019-07-12
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
1-12
ISSN
  • 0730-0301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7368
OpenAlex
W2942074357
Cited by
1,356
References
58
FWCI
97.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deferred neural rendering: image synthesis using neural textures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1145/3306346.3323035
The paper
Thies, J., Zollhöfer, M., & Nießner, M. (2019). Deferred neural rendering: image synthesis using neural textures. ACM Transactions on Graphics. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306346.3323035

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.