The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differences
Abstract
Algorithmic decision-making systems are increasingly used throughout the public and private sectors to make important decisions or assist humans in making these decisions with real social consequences. While there has been substantial research in recent years to build fair decision-making algorithms, there has been less research seeking to understand the factors that affect people's perceptions of fairness in these systems, which we argue is also important for their broader acceptance. In this research, we conduct an online experiment to better understand perceptions of fairness, focusing on three sets of factors: algorithm outcomes, algorithm development and deployment procedures, and individual differences. We find that people rate the algorithm as more fair when the algorithm predicts in their favor, even surpassing the negative effects of describing algorithms that are very biased against particular demographic groups. We find that this effect is moderated by several variables, including participants' education level, gender, and several aspects of the development procedure. Our findings suggest that systems that evaluate algorithmic fairness through users' feedback must consider the possibility of "outcome favorability" bias.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As opposed to some previous work where a human would supervise each decision made by the algorithmic system [103] -the authors did not fnd any evidence of this confguration afecting fairness perceptions-”
From Disentangling Fairness Perceptions in Algorithmic Decision-Making: the Effects of Explanations, Human Oversight, and Contestability (2023) · cites this paper as [103]
In the citing paper
“These results resonate with earlier work on the topic [103], where a case-by-case human intervention did not contribute to perceptions of fairness.”
From Disentangling Fairness Perceptions in Algorithmic Decision-Making: the Effects of Explanations, Human Oversight, and Contestability (2023) · cites this paper as [103]
In the citing paper
“The reason behind this design choice was to minimize, as far as possible, the outcome favourability bias [103].”
From Disentangling Fairness Perceptions in Algorithmic Decision-Making: the Effects of Explanations, Human Oversight, and Contestability (2023) · cites this paper as [103]
In the citing paper
“This increased efficiency is likely to increase consumers' evaluations of chatbot-based results as more fair and objective [70,71].”
From Consumer Responses to Generative AI Chatbots Versus Search Engines for Product Evaluation (2025) · cites this paper as [71]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, the ability of AI chatbots to provide quick, complete, and direct answers to consumer queries is known to increase the perceived objectivity of the search results [71].”
From Consumer Responses to Generative AI Chatbots Versus Search Engines for Product Evaluation (2025) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cites
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining · doi:10.1145/2939672.2939778 · Cited by 17,555
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-3702 · Cited by 4,872
Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers
Nass, C., & Moon, Y. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00153 · Cited by 4,022
Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2012) · Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1145/2090236.2090255 · Cited by 3,501
Algorithm aversion: People erroneously avoid algorithms after seeing them err.
Dietvorst, B. J., Simmons, J. P., & Massey, C. (2015) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/xge0000033 · Cited by 3,232
Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learning
Hardt, M., Price, E., & Srebro, N. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1610.02413 · Cited by 2,536
Hatfield, E. C., Walster, G. W., Berscheid, E., Austin, W. G., Traupmann, J., & Utne, M. K. (1978) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,387
Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representations
Bau, D., Zhou, B., Khosla, A., Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.354 · Cited by 1,389
Rivera, L. A. (2012) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122412463213 · Cited by 1,371
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 58 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Alekh Agarwal, Alina Beygelzimer, Miroslav Dudík, John Langford, and Hanna Wallach. 2018. A reductions approach to fair classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.02453 (2018). · arXiv
- Julia Angwin, Jeff Larson, Surya Mattu, and Lauren Kirchner. 2016. Machine Bias. (May 2016). https://www.propublica.org/article/ machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing
- 10.1177/0049124118782533 · DOI · Paper page
- Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. 77--91.
- Pew Research Center. 2016a. Mechanical Turk: Research in the Crowdsourcing Age. (July 2016). https://www.pewinternet.org/2016/07/11/ research-in-the-crowdsourcing-age-a-case-study/
- Pew Research Center. 2016b. On Views of Race and Inequality, Blacks and Whites Are Worlds Apart. (June 2016). https://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2016/06/27/onviews-of-race-and-inequality-blacks-and-whites-areworlds-apart/.
- Alexandra Chouldechova and Aaron Roth. 2018. The frontiers of fairness in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.08810 (2018). · arXiv
- Bo Cowgill. 2018. Bias and Productivity in Humans and Algorithms: Theory and Evidence from Resume Screening. Columbia Business School, Columbia University 29 (2018).
- Cynthia Dwork, Nicole Immorlica, Adam Tauman Kalai, and Max Leiserson. 2018. Decoupled classifiers for group-fair and efficient machine learning. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. 119--133.
- Nikolaus Franke, Peter Keinz, and Katharina Klausberger. 2013. ?Does this sound like a fair deal?": Antecedents and consequences of fairness expectations in the individual's decision to participate in firm innovation. Organization science 24, 5 (2013), 1495--1516.
- Megan French and Jeff Hancock. 2017. What's the folk theory? Reasoning about cyber-social systems. Available at SSRN (2017). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2910571
- Jon Kleinberg, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Manish Raghavan. 2016. Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.05807 (2016). · arXiv
- 10.5555/3305381.3305576 · DOI
- Louise Matsakis. 2016. The Unknown, Poorly Paid Labor Force Powering Academic Research. (Feb. 2016). https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8q8ggb/ the-unknown-poorly-paid-labor-force-powering-academic-research
- Aditya Krishna Menon and Robert C Williamson. 2018. The cost of fairness in binary classification. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. 107--118.
- Diana C Mutz and Jeffery J Mondak. 1997. Dimensions of sociotropic behavior: Group-based judgements of fairness and well-being. American Journal of Political Science (1997), 284--308.
- Emma Pierson. 2017. Demographics and discussion influence views on algorithmic fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.09124 (2017). · arXiv
- Carrie Pomeroy. 2019. How community members in Ramsey County stopped a big-data plan from flagging students as at-risk. (Feb. 2019). https://www.tcdailyplanet.net/how-communitymembers-in-ramsey-county-stopped-a-big-data-planfrom-flagging-students-as-at-risk/.
- Forough Poursabzi-Sangdeh, Daniel G Goldstein, Jake M Hofman, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, and Hanna Wallach. 2018. Manipulating and measuring model interpretability. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07810 (2018). · arXiv
- Daniel B Shank. 2012. Perceived Justice and Reactions to Coercive Computers. In Sociological Forum, Vol. 27. Wiley Online Library, 372--391.
- Megha Srivastava, Hoda Heidari, and Andreas Krause. 2019. Mathematical Notions vs. Human Perception of Fairness: A Descriptive Approach to Fairness for Machine Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.04783 (2019). · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 211
Aljuneidi, S., Heuten, W., Abdenebaoui, L., Wolters, M. K., & Boll, S. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642535 · Cited by 15
Xuan, Y., Small, E. A., Sokol, K., Hettiachchi, D., & Sanderson, M. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103376 · Cited by 17
Gemalmaz, M. A., & Yin, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534201 · Cited by 10
Augmenting machine learning with human insights: the model development for B2B personalization
Yaghtin, S., & Mero, J. (2023) · Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing · doi:10.1108/jbim-02-2023-0073 · Cited by 10
Miazek, K., & Bocian, K. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100719 · Cited by 16
Barnett, S., Brand, N., Odom, W., & Andres, K. (2022) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3546155.3547286 · Cited by 10
Balancing Act: Evaluating People’s Perceptions of Fair Ranking Metrics
Alkhathlan, M., Cachel, K., Shrestha, H., Harrison, L., & Rundensteiner, E. A. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3659018 · Cited by 9
Ehrhardt, N., Renn, M., & Utz, S. (2025) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02354-2 · Cited by 15
van Leeuwen, C., Smets, A., Jacobs, A., & Ballon, P. (2021) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/3468507.3468514 · Cited by 9
Auditing Algorithms: A Rational Counterfactual Framework
Lee, S. C. (2021) · Journal of international technology and information management · doi:10.58729/1941-6679.1464 · Cited by 10
Li, C., & Xing, W. (2022) · ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S) · doi:10.1145/3491140.3528293 · Cited by 12
Zhang, Y., & Chen, H. (2023) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2023.2218955 · Cited by 8
Die Tragik der Algorithm Aversion
Filiz, I., Judek, J. R., Lorenz, M., & Spiwoks, M. (2021) · doi:10.46850/sofia.9783941627888 · Cited by 8
Yurrita, M., Verma, H., Balayn, A., Gadiraju, U., Pont, S. C., & Bozzon, A. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713145 · Cited by 11
Navigating Automated Hiring: Perceptions, Strategy Use, and Outcomes Among Young Job Seekers
Armstrong, L., & Metaxa, D. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3711038 · Cited by 12
Spatio-Temporal Graph Analytics on Secondary Affect Data for Improving Trustworthy Emotional AI
Uddin, M. T., Yin, L., & Canavan, S. J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2023.3296695 · Cited by 7
A Study on Social Exclusion in Human-Robot Interaction
Spisak, S. E., & Indurkhya, B. (2023) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics12071585 · Cited by 8
Passi, S., Dhanorkar, S., & Vorvoreanu, M. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-3658-0_98 · Cited by 9
Loefflad, C., & Großklags, J. (2024) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3630106.3658986 · Cited by 9
Doing Responsibilities with Automated Grading Systems: An Empirical Multi-Stakeholder Exploration
Figueras, C., Rossitto, C., & Pargman, T. C. (2024) · Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3679318.3685334 · Cited by 5
Do Crowdsourced Fairness Preferences Correlate with Risk Perceptions?
Haider, C. M. R., Clifton, C. W., & Yin, M. (2024) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3640543.3645209 · Cited by 8
The Role of Initial Acceptance Attitudes Toward AI Decisions in Algorithmic Recourse
Tominaga, T., Yamashita, N., & Kurashima, T. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713573 · Cited by 4
Lay Perceptions of Algorithmic Discrimination in the Context of Systemic Injustice
Lima, G., Grgić-Hlača, N., Langer, M., & Zou, Y. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713536 · Cited by 5
Pyle, C., & Andalibi, N. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757550 · Cited by 4
Zhang, J., Cao, J., & Meng, T. (2026) · Journal of Chinese Political Science · doi:10.1007/s11366-026-09944-x · Cited by 6
Sarkar, P., & Liem, C. C. S. (2024) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3637360 · Cited by 6
To Impress an Algorithm: Minoritized Applicants’ Perceptions of Fairness in AI Hiring Systems
Girona, A. E., & Yarger, L. K. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-57860-1_4 · Cited by 7
“Inventor’s Bias” at Work: When Low-Performing Algorithms Seem Fair
Cratsley, M. J., & Fast, N. J. (2023) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2023.2224954 · Cited by 4
The impact of process automation on performance
Strobel, C. (2025) · Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics · doi:10.1016/j.socec.2025.102377 · Cited by 4
Yokota, T., & Nakao, Y. (2022) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3511047.3538033 · Cited by 8
User Acceptance of Gender Stereotypes in Automated Career RecommendationsPreprint
Wang, C., Wang, K., Bian, A., Islam, R., Keya, K. N., Foulds, J. R., & Pan, S. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2106.07112 · Cited by 14
XAI4RE – Using Explainable AI for Responsible and Ethical AI
Tal, A. S., & Sheidin, J. (2025) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3708319.3733707 · Cited by 3
Comprehensive Metaverse Design Concept Using Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and Mixed Reality
Yadav, A. K., & Dwivedi, S. P. (2024) · Blockchain technologies · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-2278-5_11 · Cited by 4
Hellwig, P., & Maier, G. W. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-26104-6_4 · Cited by 4
Algorithmic Decision Making in Education: Challenges and Opportunities
Levantis, N., & Sgora, A. (2024) · IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) · doi:10.1109/educon60312.2024.10578645 · Cited by 6
Sugitani, Y., Togawa, T., & Motoki, K. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100152 · Cited by 4
Wang, G., Singh, V. K., & Zhang, D. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3710921 · Cited by 4
Modeling Disclosive Transparency in NLP Application Descriptions
Saxon, M., Levy, S., Wang, X., Albalak, A., & Wang, W. Y. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.153 · Cited by 3
Hohma, E., Burnell, R., Corrigan, C. C., & Luetge, C. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society · doi:10.1109/tts.2022.3211073 · Cited by 3
Langer, M., Hunsicker, T., Feldkamp, T., König, C. J., & Grgić-Hlača, N. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 3
Questioning AI: How Racial Identity Shapes the Perceptions of Algorithmic BiasPreprint
Kim, S., Lee, J., & Oh, P. (2023) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/afcdn · Cited by 6
Liu, B., Gambino, A., & Wei, L. (2025) · Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications · doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000487 · Cited by 2
Lyons, H., Miller, T., & Velloso, E. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757468 · Cited by 2
Kaufman, Z., Endres, M., Xiong, C., & Brun, Y. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2025.3634245 · Cited by 3
Lind, R., Nilsson, K. H., Strauss-Raats, P., Quinlan, M. G., Brulin, E., Lee, M. K., & Håkansta, C. (2025) · The Economic and Labour Relations Review · doi:10.1017/elr.2025.10046 · Cited by 2
Chen, C., Liao, M., Phadnis, A. A., Li, Y., High, A. C., Abdullah, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791542 · Cited by 2
Magalhães, P. C., Arnesen, S., Kern, C. A., König, P. D., Schiff, D. S., & Tyler, T. R. (2026) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2026.103398 · Cited by 3
Büttner, S., Goudarzi, M., & Prilla, M. (2024) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3670653.3677492 · Cited by 2
Judged by Robots: Preferences and Perceived Fairness of Algorithmic versus Human Punishments
Locci, I., & Massoni, S. (2024) · Review of Law & Economics · doi:10.1515/rle-2024-0063 · Cited by 3
How Does Predictive Information Affect Human Ethical Preferences?
Narayanan, S., Yu, G., Tang, W., Ho, C.-J., & Yin, M. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534165 · Cited by 2
Rusko, R., Koivisto, S.-A., & Jestilä, S. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-9658-0_2 · Cited by 3
FinA: Fairness of Adverse Effects in Decision-Making of Human-Cyber-Physical-System
Zhao, T., & Elmalaki, S. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Cyber-Physical Systems (ICCPS) · doi:10.1109/iccps61052.2024.00025 · Cited by 2
Fair Artificial Intelligence to Support STEM Education
Xing, W., & Li, C. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198882077.003.0023 · Cited by 2
Talking About the Assumption in the Room
Mothilal, R. K., Lalani, F. M., Ahmed, S. I., Guha, S., & Sultana, S. (2025) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713958 · Cited by 2
Perceptions of the Fairness Impacts of Multiplicity in Machine Learning
Meyer, A. P., Kim, Y.-S., D'Antoni, L., & Albarghouthi, A. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3713524 · Cited by 1
Aljuneidi, S., Heuten, W., Wolters, M. K., & Boll, S. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05002-1_5 · Cited by 1
Gao, H., & Wang, G. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251382808 · Cited by 6
Regulating Social Media: Surveying the Impact of Nepali Government's TikTok Ban
Khatiwada, P., Ciuba, A., Nayak, A., Gautam, A., & Mauriello, M. L. (2025) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3757648 · Cited by 4
THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF ALGORITHMIC TRANSPARENCY ON TRUST: A MULTI-DISCIPLINARY ANALYSIS
Čvokić, D. D. (2025) · Acta scientifica Balcanica. · doi:10.63356/asb.2025.002 · Cited by 1
Loefflad, C., Chen, M., & Grossklags, J. (2025) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1155/hbe2/9184190 · Cited by 3
AI Resource Allocation: On the Contribution of Distributive and Procedural Fairness
Esch, C., Werner, D., Gross, M. E., Kals, E., & Pfeuffer, C. U. (2025) · International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction (HAI) · doi:10.1145/3765766.3765776 · Cited by 1
Beyond Bias Detection: Community Auditors and Normative Reasoning in AI Oversight CSCW006
Jackson, C., Ahmad, T., Raj, S. D., & Wu, N. (2026) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3788042 · Cited by 1
Digital queues as phygital pre-service touchpoints: an expectation confirmation perspective
Qu, Y., Chen, Y., & Baek, E. (2026) · Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642069.2026.2727031 · Cited by 1
A BLACK BOX APPROACH TO AUDITING ALGORITHMS
(2022) · Issues in Information Systems · doi:10.48009/2_iis_2022_107 · Cited by 3
Quantifying Actionability: Evaluating Human-Recipient Models
Kelechi, N., & Jiao, L. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3324906 · Cited by 1
Proliferations in Algorithmic Control: Review of the Phenomenon and Its Implications
Dutta, S., Pramanik, H. S., Rajan, S. G., Rajan, R. G., & Satapathy, S. (2023) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-50188-3_5 · Cited by 1
Enhancing Auto-Generated Baseball Highlights via Win Probability and Bias Injection Method
Park, K., Lim, H., Lee, J., & Suh, B. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3642021 · Cited by 1
Human Perceptions of Fairness: A Survey Experiment
Sengewald, J., Schlichter, A., Siepermann, M., & Lackes, R. (2025) · Lecture notes in information systems and organisation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-80119-8_4 · Cited by 1
Nguyen, T. T., Xu, J., Nguyen-Le, P.-A., Lazar, J. K., Braman, D., Daumé, H., & Jelveh, Z. (2025) · International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1145/3769126.3769199 · Cited by 1
The Impact of the ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ on Algorithmic Fairness
Sengewald, J., & Lackes, R. (2021) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-87205-2_14 · Cited by 1
Perceived Fairness Concerns Within Pandemic Response Technology
Ryan, S., Nurgalieva, L., & Doherty, G. J. (2022) · Interacting with Computers · doi:10.1093/iwc/iwac040 · Cited by 1
Algorithmic Gender Bias: Investigating Perceptions of Discrimination in Automated Decision-MakingPreprint
Kim, S., Oh, P., & Lee, J. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zpqrt · Cited by 1
Dimensions of Transparency in NLP Applications.Preprint
Saxon, M., Levy, S., Wang, X., Albalak, A., & Wang, W. Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Modeling Discolsive Transparency in NLP Application DescriptionsPreprint
Saxon, M., Levy, S., Wang, X., Albalak, A., & Wang, W. Y. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University)
Fair Engineering of Machine Learning Systems – Lessons Learned from a Literature Review
Sengewald, J., & Lackes, R. (2022) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2022.605
Deters, J. (2022) · De Gruyter eBooks · doi:10.1515/9783110980967-011
Trotter, C., & Chen, Y. (2024) · ACM Southeast Regional Conference (ACMSE) · doi:10.1145/3603287.3651192
Hoeppner, S., & Samek, M. (2024) · AUC IURIDICA · doi:10.14712/23366478.2024.24 · Cited by 1
Just AI: Using Socio-Legal Studies of Fairness to Inform Ethical AI in Government
Henman, P. W. F. (2024) · Palgrave socio-legal studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-67244-6_3
Yokota, T., & Nakao, Y. (2025) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82633-7_8 · Cited by 1
Integrating Edge Computing-Based Ethical Decision-Making Framework for AI
Ryu, J., Kim, H., & Yoon, Y.-I. (2025) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3701716.3717663
Naming And Blaming Automated Decision-Making Systems: Analysis Of Contesting Algorithmic Injustice
Gules-Guctas, E. (2023) · Scholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York) · doi:10.54014/ybg8-z8sd
“Subjective Biased Perception on AI Knowledge and AI Aversion”
Oezguer, K., Jan, S., & Thomas, L. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) · doi:10.1109/percomworkshops65533.2025.00070
Wang, Y. (2025) · International Journal of High Speed Electronics and Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129156425406990
Dehankar, P., Chaturvedi, K., & Das, S. (2025) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0928-6.ch014
ElSayary, A., & Murshidi, G. H. A. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-4908-4.ch002
Exploring demographic influences on fairness perceptions across the ML development lifecycle
Mishra, A., Khazanchi, D., & Tripathi, A. (2026) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-026-01034-1 · Cited by 1
An Exploratory Study of User Perceptions of Information Across Social Media Platforms
Loh, Z., Zand, G., & Arif, A. S. (2025) · Graphics Interface · doi:10.1145/3769872.3769876
Skin-Deep Bias: How Avatar Appearances Shape Perceptions of AI Hiring
Lau, K. H. C., Stark, P., Bozkir, E., & Kasneci, E. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790379 · Cited by 1
Aljuneidi, S., Heuten, W., Bilyalova, Z., Wolters, M. K., & Boll, S. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790795 · Cited by 1
He, C., Jahangirirad, P., Kyi, L., & Biega, A. J. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791802
Jones-Jang, S. M., Kim, N., Chung, M., Choi, J., & Lee, S. Y. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2663075
Guo, J., Luo, H., Liu, H., & Chen, H. (2026) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2026.2675497
Algorithmic Fairness Perception
Zhang, X. (2026) · International Journal of Intelligent Information Technologies · doi:10.4018/ijiit.412667
What Influences Readers' and Writers' Perceived Necessity of AI Disclosure?
Fang, J., Wen, V., & Lee, M.-N. (2026) · Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3805689.3806724 · Cited by 1
How Formerly Incarcerated People Envision Technologies for Prison Parole
Savage, S., Nava, J., Zhou, W. I., & Lee, H. J. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812258
How Probing for Problems and Bias Affects Perceptions of AI Chatbot Trustworthiness
Tolsdorf, J., Luo, A. F., Kodwani, M., Eum, J., Sharif, M., Mazurek, M. L., & Aviv, A. J. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3806751
Justiça, Responsabilidade, Transparência e Ética (FATE) em sistemas de recomendação na educação:
dos Santos, R. A., Beni, P. F., Reategui, E. B., & Barone, D. A. C. (2026) · Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência da Informação · doi:10.26512/rici.v19.n2.2026.60555
Human Oversight Is Not Neutral: How AI Grades Shape Human Grading Decisions
Zhao, C., & Silva, M. O. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-29763-1_40
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, R., Harper, F. M., & Zhu, H.
- Affiliations
- Carnegie Mellon University (US)
- Amazon (United States) (US)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2020-04-21
- Pages
- 1-14
- OpenAlex
- W3029022080
- Semantic Scholar
- 6d847d92ed6efbcd322549f732c014e9bfb1c45d
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 27.75
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (IIS-2001851, IIS-2000782, IIS-1939606)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
- Keywords
- perceived fairness, algorithmic decision-making, algorithmic fairness, algorithmic bias, individual differences, user feedback, educational attainment, gender differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
