Patricc: A Platform for Triadic Interaction with Changeable Characters
Abstract
While social robots for education are slowly being integrated in many scenarios, ranging from higher-education, through elementary school and kindergarten, the use case of robots for toddlers in their homes has not gained much attention. In this contribution, we introduce Patricc, a robotic platform that is specifically designed for toddler-parent-robot triadic interaction. It addresses the unique challenges of this age group, namely, desire for continuous physical interaction and novelty. Patricc's unique design enables changing characters by using dress-able puppets over a 3D-printed skeleton and the use of physical props. A novel authoring tool enables robot behavior and content creation by non-programmers. We conducted an evaluation study with 18 parent-toddler pairs and compared Patricc to similar tablet-based interactions. Our quantitative and qualitative analyses show that Patricc promotes significantly more triadic interaction, measured by video-coded gaze, compared to the tablet and that parents indeed perceive the interaction as triadic. Furthermore, there was no novelty-induced significant change in task-oriented behaviors, when toddlers interacted with two different characters consecutively. Finally, parents pointed out the benefits of changeable puppet-like characters over tablets and the appropriateness of the platform for the target age-group. These results suggest that Patricc can serve as the first gateway of toddlers to the emerging world of social robots.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social companion robots have proven potential to assist parents in home education settings through studies in parent-child-robot interactions.
“Social companion robots have proven potential to assist parents in home education settings through studies in parent-child-robot interactions.”
From SET-PAiREd: Designing for Parental Involvement in Learning with an AI-Assisted Educational Robot (2025) · cites this paper as [26]
The robotic system Patricc fostered more triadic interaction between parents and toddlers than a tablet.
“Gvirsman et al. [26] showed that the robotic system, Patricc , fostered more triadic interaction between parents and toddlers than a tablet”
From SET-PAiREd: Designing for Parental Involvement in Learning with an AI-Assisted Educational Robot (2025) · cites this paper as [26]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Gvirsman, O., Koren, Y., Norman, T., & Gordon, G.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
- Publisher
- ACM
- Published
- 2020-03-09
- Pages
- 399-407
- OpenAlex
- W3009345873
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 2.47
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Educational Robotics and Engineering
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Keywords
- social robots, toddlers, triadic interaction, home robots, gaze behavior, novelty, tablet comparison, early childhood education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review