Cited by 227Tactile and Sensory InteractionsInteractive and Immersive DisplaysTeleoperation and Haptic Systems

Putting the feel in ’look and feel‘

Oakley, Ian, McGee, Marilyn Rose, Brewster, Stephen, Gray, Philip·2000·Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Abstract

Haptic devices are now commercially available and thus touch has become a potentially realistic solution to a variety of interaction design challenges. We report on an investigation of the use of touch as a way of reducing visual overload in the conventional desktop. In a two-phase study, we investigated the use of the PHANToM haptic device as a means of interacting with a conventional graphical user interface. The first experiment compared the effects of four different haptic augmentations on usability in a simple targeting task. The second experiment involved a more ecologically-oriented searching and scrolling task. Results indicated that the haptic effects did not improve users performance in terms of task completion time. However, the number of errors made was significantly reduced. Subjective workload measures showed that participants perceived many aspects of workload as significantly less with haptics. The results are described and the implications for the use of haptics in user interface design are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/332040.332467

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In simple targeting tasks, visuotactile information decreased error rate compared with visual information only.

    “In simple targeting tasks, visuotactile information decreased error rate, as compared with visual information only (Oakley, McGee, Brewster, & Gray, 2000).”

    From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Oakley, McGee, Brewster, & Gray, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oakley, I., McGee, M. R., Brewster, S., & Gray, P.
Affiliations
University of Glasgow (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Publisher
ACM
Published
2000-04
Pages
415-422
OpenAlex
W1979318584
Cited by
227
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
77.70
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
Keywords
haptic devices, touch interaction, visual overload, graphical user interface, PHANToM haptic device, usability, workload, user interface design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review