Cited by 88E-Government and Public ServicesSmart Cities and TechnologiesEthics and Social Impacts of AI

How Machine Learning is Changing e-Government

Alexopoulos, Charalampos, Lachana, Zoi, Androutsopoulou, Aggeliki, Diamantopoulou, Vasiliki, Charalabidis, Yannis, Loutsaris, Michalis Avgerinos·2019·Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance

Abstract

Big Data is, clearly, an integral part of modern information societies. A vast amount of data is daily produced and it is estimated that, for the years to come, this number will grow dramatically. In an effort to transform the hidden information in this ocean of data into a useful one, the use of advanced technologies, such as Machine Learning, is deemed appropriate. Machine Learning is a technology that can handle Big Data classification for statistical or even more complex purposes, such as decision making. This fits perfectly with the scope of the new generation of government, Government 3.0, which explores all the new opportunities to tackle any challenge faced by contemporary societies, by utilizing new technologies for data-driven decision making. Boosted by the opportunities, Machine Learning can facilitate more and more governments participate in the development of such applications in different governmental domains. But is the Machine Learning only beneficial for public sectors? Although there is a huge number of researches in the literature related to Machine Learning applications, there is lack of a comprehensive study focusing on the usage of this technology within governmental applications. The current paper moves towards this research question, by conducting a comprehensive analysis of the use of Machine Learning by governments. Through the analysis, quite interesting findings have been identified, containing both benefits and barriers from the public sectors' p…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3326365.3326412

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alexopoulos, C., Lachana, Z., Androutsopoulou, A., Diamantopoulou, V., Charalabidis, Y., & Loutsaris, M. A.
Affiliations
University of the Aegean (GR)
Venue
Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance
Publisher
ACM
Published
2019-04-03
Pages
354-363
OpenAlex
W2946333210
Cited by
88
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
60.26
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (publishedVersion)
Funders
Erasmus+
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › E-Government and Public Services
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Media Technology › Smart Cities and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
machine learning, e-government, Government 3.0, big data, data-driven decision making, public sector, technology adoption, barriers to adoption

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review